Accounting theory & Accountability essay on stock exchange

Sharonhy
Powerpointslides-PositiveAccountingTheoryPart1.pptx

Accounting Theory

Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) Part 1

1

The 5 key Learning Objectives in this lecture about PAT

At the conclusion of this lecture, you should have an appreciation of:

The principal arguments of a positive accounting theory

Links between accounting information and share markets

How contractual relationships impact on managerial accounting policy choice

How principals curb opportunistic behaviour by managers

The incentives that induce managers to contract

Institutional theory

Legitimacy theory and

Stakeholder theory

Types Of Theories

Positive Theories

Describes, explains or predicts activities

Help us understand what happens in the world

E.g. Agency theory

Positive Accounting Theory

Used to explain and predict accounting practice.

It examines a range of relationships between the entity and

suppliers of equity capital (owners),

managerial labour (management)

debt capital (lenders or debt holders)

based on the ‘rational economic person’ assumption

Contracting Theory

Suggests that the organisation is characterised as a legal ‘nexus of contracts’.

With contracting parties having rights and responsibilities under these contracts.

Positive accounting theory focuses on

managerial contracts, and

debt contracts,

These are agency contracts used to manage relationships where there is a separation between management and capital providers.

Agency Theory

Used to understand relationships whereby a principal employs the services of, and delegates the decision making authority to, an agent.

Creates a moral hazard.

Leads to 3 ‘costs’

Monitoring costs - the cost of observing the agent’s behaviour (e.g. Auditing)

Bonding costs - costs borne by the agent as a result of aligning their interests with the principal (e.g. manager has to prepare financial reports - a cost to the manager in terms of time and effort)

Residual loss - loss associated with not being able to fully align the interests of the principal with the agent

Agency Relationships – an outcome (adverse?) of Agency Theory

Agency Costs of Equity

Risk-Aversion – limited incentive to increase value of firm through investment in risky projects

Dividend Retention – reduced incentive to pay dividends or take on optimal levels of debt

Horizon Problem – short term focus on performance of firm

Over-consumption of Perquisites

Agency Relationships – the manager-shareholder implication

Reducing the agency costs of equity

Bonuses are usually tied to firm performance in some way to motivate managers to act in the owners’ interest

Bonuses can be paid in cash and/or shares/share options

Bonuses can be tied to:

Accounting numbers(such as net income, sales, return on assets)

Share price (market based performance measure)

Agency Relationships – the Shareholder-Debtholder dilemma

Agency costs of debt

Excessive dividend payments - reducing debtholder’s security

Asset substitution - firm invests in higher risk projects (no benefit to debtholder)

Under investment - where no incentive to invest in positive NPV projects

Claim dilution - issuing higher priority debt

Agency Relationships – minimising the Shareholder-Debtholder dilemma

Reducing the agency costs of debt

Debt-holders can Price Protect via increased interest charges or reduced amounts of loans provided

The interests of shareholders can be bonded to those of debtholders via restrictions in lending agreements (Loan Covenants)

Covenants often rely on numbers contained in financial statements

Covenants usually restrict the behaviour of managers acting on behalf of owners

The End