Draft Assignment
EDCO 745
Poster: Draft Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Below Expectations |
Not present |
|
Summary of the Research |
4 points The student’s summary included arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and clearly identified research question(s) that should be addressed. |
3 points The student’s summary included most arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). |
2 points The student’s summary needed to be developed more fully. Arguments lacked sufficient information why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). |
1 points The student’s summary did not include arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). |
0 points Not Present |
|
Working Research Question(s) |
4 points The working research questions are clearly stated and understandable. |
3 points Most of the working research questions are stated and understandable. |
2 points Some of the working research questions are stated but are vague. |
1 points Working research questions are poorly stated and cannot be understood. |
0 points Not Present |
|
IV, DVs, Covariates interview questions |
4 points IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) are clearly stated and understandable. |
3 points Most of the IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) are clearly stated and understandable. |
2 points Some of the IV, DVs, and covariates (if applicable) interview questions are partially described. |
1 points IV, DVs, and covariates interview questions are poorly described. |
0 points Not Present |
|
Results |
3 points The appropriate tables and visuals are provided in the analysis. |
1 to 2 points Most of the appropriate tables and are provided in the analysis. |
0 to 1 points Some of appropriate tables and visuals are provided in the analysis. |
1 points The appropriate tables and visuals are not provided in the analysis. |
0 points Not Present |
|
Discussion |
3 points The interpretation of results, limitations, and future research are discussed. |
2 to 3 points Most of the interpretation of results, limitations, and future research are discussed. |
1 to 2 points Some of the interpretation of results, limitations, and future research are discussed. |
0 to 1 points The interpretation of results, limitations, and future research have minimal discussion. |
0 points Not Present |
|
Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Style |
6 to 7 Points The assignment properly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are formatted correctly. The assignment reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and/or grammar errors.
|
4 to 6 Points The assignment mostly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are mostly formatted correctly. The assignment reflects generally a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and/or grammar errors.
|
2 to 4 Points The assignment uses some current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are sometimes formatted correctly. The assignment sometimes reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are some spelling and/or grammar errors.
|
1 to 2 Points The assignment uses few current APA style and and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are rarely formatted correctly. The assignment seldom reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are many spelling and/or grammar errors.
|
0 points Not Present |
Page 2 of 2