logo

Points: 150 (15% of grade)

Prompt:   The 2003 documentary, No Logo, examines the intersections of global capitalism, advertising, and the consequences of living in a global consumer society.   After watching this documentary I’d like you to answer the following questions. Please note that first person “I” is encouraged; however, your reflection should engage with readings from Week 1 at length.

· Do you buy her argument(s)?   Why or why not?

· How does the documentary draw upon, challenge, and/or relate to Jhally, Twitchell and/or other arguments presented in this week's readings? 

·  It’s been over fifteen years since NO LOGO was filmed. Do you think Klein’s arguments are still relevant? (Hint: Think about each of the four sub points.). What’s changed? What’s remained the same?

· Look back at the definition of consumer-citizen. What does this documentary teach us about the relationship between (national? global)  political participation and consumption? 

· Think back to your version of the “American Dream.”   Has it changed after viewing this film? Why or why not?

  Grading Criteria:

·         Critically engages with Sut Jhally/Twitchell’s essay, “On Advertising”  AND at least one other reading from Week 1

·  Discusses examples/evidence from the documentary in relation to the key term "consumer-citizen" (refer to previous page for definition)

·         Introduces authors and arguments and thoughtfully utilizes concepts rather than summarize or relying on direct quotes

·         Support reflection/response with examples from texts and film

·         Uses appropriate “voice” and “tone” for an informed, academic audience

·         MLA, APA, or Chicago style citation

(No Works Cited Page Required)

 Three or four   (3-4) pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman Font

Meets college level writing standards; including grammar, punctuation, syntax, clarity, etc