Philosophy
Name: Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting
Description: PHI210 Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting
|
|
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue. |
Points: 0 (0%) Did not submit or incompletely selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; did not submit or incompletely stated your position on the issue. |
3.9 (13%) Insufficiently selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; insufficiently stated your position on the issue. |
Points: 4.5 (15%) Partially selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; partially stated your position on the issue. |
Points: 5.1 (17%) Satisfactorily selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; satisfactorily stated your position on the issue. |
Points: 6 (20%) Thoroughly selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; thoroughly stated your position on the issue. |
|
2. Identify three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org. |
Points: 0 (0%) Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org. |
Points: 5.85 (19.5%) Insufficiently identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org. |
Points: 6.75 (22.5%) Partially identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org. |
Points: 7.65 (25.5%) Satisfactorily identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section under “Con” from procon.org. |
Points: 9 (30%) Thoroughly identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section “from procon.org. |
|
3. Provide answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. |
Points: 0 (0%) Did not submit or incompletely provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. |
Points: 7.8 (26%) Insufficiently provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. |
Points: 9 (30%) Partially provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. |
Points: 10.2 (34%) Satisfactorily provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. |
Points: 12 (40%) Thoroughly provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. |
|
4. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. Follow SWS Style format. |
Points: 0 (0%) Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. |
Points: 1.95 (6.5%) Had 8-9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. |
Points: 2.25 (7.5%) Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. |
Points: 2.55 (8.5%) Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. |
Points: 3 (10%) Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. |
The rubric total value of 0.00 has been overridden with a value of 0 out of 30.0.
Name:Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting
Description:PHI210 Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting
Exit