Prospectus Topic " An examination of Police Brutality and it's Impact on Victims Families"
Walden University
Dissertation Prospectus Guide
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page i
What’s New in 2018
The 2018 edition of the Dissertation Prospectus Guide contains additional material to support
prospectus development. What has not changed are the basic expectations for the content of the
prospectus and how it will be evaluated and approved. Specific new items in this guide include
• discussion about research design alignment;
• added clarity in the outline annotations;
• enhanced formatting for better presentation, including a separate Purpose section;
• updated sample prospectuses to include both a quantitative and a qualitative example; and
• the sample prospectus documents captured in the historic alignment tool (HAT), which is introduced in Residency 3.
For internal use only
Walden University
100 Washington Avenue South
Suite 900
Minneapolis, MN 55401
1-800-WALDENU (1-800-925-3368)
Walden University is accredited by The Higher Learning Commission, www.hlcommission.org;
1-312-263-0456.
© 2018 Walden University, LLC
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page ii
Contents What’s New in 2018 ........................................................................................................................ i
The Prospectus ................................................................................................................................ 1
Completing the Prospectus .......................................................................................................... 1
My Doctoral Research (MyDR) ................................................................................................... 3
An Annotated Outline ..................................................................................................................... 4
Sample Quantitative Prospectus ..................................................................................................... 8
Sample Qualitative Prospectus ..................................................................................................... 18
Quality Indicators.......................................................................................................................... 28
Dissertation Prospectus Rubric ................................................................................................. 28
Ten Tips for Writing a Quality Prospectus ................................................................................... 30
Sample Quantitative Prospectus in the Historic Alignment Tool (HAT) ..................................... 32
Sample Qualitative Prospectus in the Historic Alignment Tool (HAT) ....................................... 33
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 1
The Prospectus The Dissertation Prospectus is a brief document that provides preliminary information about
your dissertation research and is used in two ways:
• It serves as an agreed-upon plan for developing the proposal and is evaluated to ensure doctoral-level work.
• It serves as a step to finalize the structure of your dissertation supervisory committee, who will work with you on completing the dissertation.
Completing the Prospectus
The Dissertation Prospectus consists of several short sections, which are detailed in the
annotated outline. Your goal for the prospectus is to create a plan for developing your
dissertation proposal. Therefore, you need to have more information for the prospectus than for
your earlier documents, such as the Dissertation Premise, but you do not need to know all the
specific details of the study that you will ultimately conduct. For example, you may identify
intelligence as a covariate in a quantitative study, but at this point, you do not yet need to identify
the instrument that you plan to use to measure the covariate.
Also, because every research project is unique, and because this outline is general, you may be
asked to include additional information in your prospectus to help assure your supervisory
committee that you are headed in the right direction. For example, feasibility will be one
criterion for evaluating your prospectus, and if you are considering a very unique sample group,
your committee may ask that you explore that aspect in more detail before moving forward.
The Dissertation Prospectus should follow the guidelines in the sixth edition of the Publication
Manual of the American Psychological Association and be saved as either a .doc, .docx, or .rtf
file. As you work on the document, you may also want to review the Litmus Test for a Doctoral-
Level Research Problem, which is available on the Research Resources page of the Center for
Research Quality site, your historic alignment tool (HAT) from your academic residency
experience, as well as the nine quality indicators included in this guide.
One prospectus quality indicator that is not included as a separate section in the prospectus
document, but rather is holistically assessed throughout the prospectus, is research design
alignment. The rubric item reads: “Aligned? Do the various components of the research plan
align overall?" Alignment is critically important to research quality. Research design alignment
means that all pieces of the study design match and/or complement one another. For example,
the identified doctoral-level problem must drive the purpose of the study and the research
questions. The framework must support the research approach overall. There should be common
language throughout, with concepts and theories corresponding with the problem and purpose—
meaning that language should be repeated from earlier sections into later sections. As you write,
be sure to connect the dots among each section of the prospectus, ensuring alignment throughout.
The visual below represents this idea.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 2
Conceptualizing the research plan and the various components of the research design is
sometimes challenging. One way to assist with this and to ensure research design alignment is to
use a visual to help you see how the various parts of a research design should fit together and
therefore must align with one another. For example, as presented in the graphic below, the
Problem Statement, Purpose, and Framework in the prospectus must align with all other pieces
of the research design. This example has three research questions. If one research question does
not appear to fit with the study purpose, it does not belong in the study design. The method and
design make up the section in the prospectus called “Nature of the Study.” Each section must
coordinate with the others.
As a self-check, you should ask yourself these questions about your research design:
1. Is there a logical progression from the research problem to the purpose of the study?
2. Does the identified framework ground the investigation in the stated problem?
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 3
3. Do the problem, purpose, and framework align with the RQ(s) and nature of the study?
4. Does each RQ address the problem and align with the purpose of the study?
5. Will the instrument, data source, and analysis address the RQ?
Depending on your academic program, you will be in a course of some type that supports
prospectus development and will work with your committee chair and second member to
complete the document. See your specific program of study for more information on the type of
course and the timing of it. Keep in mind that prospectus development is an iterative process and
that you will receive feedback on working drafts, as will happen with the proposal and
dissertation.
When your supervisory committee members agree that your prospectus meets all the quality
indicators discussed herein, they will endorse it for review by your academic program director or
designee. After the program director or designee gives final approval of the prospectus and your
supervisory committee, you will start working on your proposal. This entire approval process
will occur in My Doctoral Research (MyDR).
My Doctoral Research (MyDR)
If you have not done so already, you should familiarize yourself with the MyDR system and
other resources on the Center for Research Quality website. The MyDR system was designed to
assist you and your committee in navigating your doctoral research journey, from the very
beginning through the final approval. The various landing pages in MyDR will track your
progress and will serve as a central location for resources to support that progress. The
Taskstream element of the MyDR system is used to establish a process flow tool in which you
exchange and store faculty evaluations of and feedback on your work as you progress along that
journey.
You will be entered into the MyDR system when both your committee chair and second member
nominees are approved by the academic program. At that point, you will be able to access MyDR
from the homepage of your dissertation completion course in Blackboard. The first document
that you will submit for approval in MyDR will be your prospectus.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 4
An Annotated Outline The Prospectus document includes a title page (page 1) followed by pages containing the
required elements in the prospectus. Please use the Prospectus template that is available on the
Writing Center website.
Title Page
The recommended title length is 12 words or fewer to include the topic, the variables and
relationship between them, and the critical keywords. Double-space the title if over one line of
type and center it under the word “Prospectus.” Please note that your dissertation title will likely
change as the project evolves.
Include your name, your program of study (and specialization, if applicable), and Student
ID number—double-spaced and centered under the title.
Title
Start with “Prospectus” and a colon, and then include the title as it appears on the title
page. Double-space if over one line of type and center it at the top of the page.
Problem Statement
Provide a one- to two-paragraph statement that is the result of a review of research
findings and current practice and that contains the following information:
1. A logical argument for the need to address an identified gap in the research literature that has current relevance to the discipline and area of practice. Keep in mind that a gap
in the research is not, in and of itself, a reason to conduct research. Make sure to clarify
the problem that led you to the gap. The situation being experienced in a societal
population or discipline is described within the problem statement.
2. Preliminary evidence that provides justification that this problem is meaningful to the discipline or professional field. Provide three to five key citations that support the
relevance and currency of the problem. These references need not all be from peer-
reviewed journals but should be from reputable sources, such as national agency
Note:
A social problem involves an issue that affects a specific population/discipline. It is the issue
that students see “on the ground” so to speak. The social problem is often what prompts students
to think about a topic of interest drives their dissertation topic. Usually such a topic is one that
students identify with, sometimes having personally experienced some aspect of the problem as
it exists in the world. All too often, students want to solve a specific social, organizational,
clinical, or practical problem rather than explore a research problem.
A research problem is a focused topic of concern, a condition to be improved upon, or troubling
question that is supported in scholarly literature or theory that you study to understand in more
detail, and that can lead to recommendations for resolutions. It is the research problem that
drives the rest of the dissertation: the purpose, the research questions, and the methodology. It is
the research problem that is identified in the Problem Statement of the prospectus.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 5
databases or scholarly books, and should ideally be from the past 5 years.
3. Assure that the problem is framed within and primarily focused on the discipline (program of study).
Purpose
Present a concise, one-paragraph statement on the overall purpose or intention of the
study, which serves as the connection between the problem being addressed and the focus of the
study.
• In quantitative studies, state what needs be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and a conjectured relationship among them related to the identified gap or
problem.
• In qualitative studies, describe the need for increased understanding about the issue to be studied, based on the identified gap or problem.
• In mixed-methods studies, with both quantitative and qualitative aspects, clarify how the two approaches will be used together to inform the study.
Significance
Provide one or two paragraphs, informed by the topic in the problem statement, that
describe the following:
1. How this study will contribute to filling the gap identified in the problem statement: What original contribution will this study make?
2. How this research will support professional practice or allow practical application: Answer the So what? question.
3. How the claim aligns with the problem statement to reflect the potential relevance of this study to society: How might the potential findings lead
to positive social change?
Background
Provide (a) the keywords or phrases that you searched and the databases used; and (b) a
representative list of scholarship and findings, or an annotated bibliography, that support and
clarify the main assertions in the problem statement, highlighting their relationship to the topic,
for example, “this variable was studied with a similar sample by Smith (2013) and Johnson
(2014)” or “Jones’s (2012) examination of industry leaders showed similar trends in the same
key segments.” Some of these resources may have already been mentioned in the first sections of
the prospectus and can be included here, also. Provide 5 to 10 peer-reviewed articles most of
which should have been published within the last 5 years and/or represent current information on
the topic.
Framework (Conceptual or Theoretical)
In one paragraph, describe the framework that demonstrates an understanding of the
theories and concepts relevant to your topic. Align the framework with the problem, purpose,
research questions, and background of your study. This theoretical or conceptual framework is
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 6
the basis for understanding, designing, and analyzing ways to investigate your research problem
(data collection and analysis). Provide the original scholarly literature on the theory or concepts
even if it is more than 5 years old. Please do not cite secondary sources.
Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)
List the question or a series of related questions that are informed by the study purpose,
which will lead to the development of what needs to be done in this study and how it will be
accomplished. A research question informs the research design by providing a foundation for
• generation of hypotheses in quantitative studies,
• questions necessary to build the design structure for qualitative studies, and
• a process by which different methods will work together in mixed-methods studies.
Nature of the Study
Provide a concise paragraph that (a) presents the approach that will be used to address the
research question(s) and (b) discusses how this approach aligns with the problem statement. The
examples of study design are as follows:
• Quantitative—for experimental, quasiexperimental, or nonexperimental designs; treatment-control; repeated measures; causal-comparative; single-subject; predictive
studies; or other quantitative approaches
• Qualitative—for ethnography, case study, grounded theory, narrative inquiry, phenomenological research, policy analysis, or other qualitative traditions
• Mixed methods, primarily quantitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the main focus on quantitative methods
• Mixed methods, primarily qualitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the main focus on qualitative methods
• Other—for another design, to be specified with a justification provided for its use
Possible Types and Sources of Data
Secondary data include public or existing data that are collected by others. Primary data
are collected by the researcher. Provide a list of possible types and sources of data that could be
used to address the proposed research question(s), such as test scores from college students,
employee surveys, observations of a phenomenon, interviews with practitioners, historical
documents from state records, de-identified medical records, or information from a federal
database. For secondary, or preexisting data, identify the data source, how the data will be
accessed, and the data points that will be used to address the research questions. For primary
data, explain the data points, how the data will be obtained, and potential participants who will
be accessed to address the research questions. Possible secondary data sources, by program, are
available on the Center for Research Quality website. Sources of information that support and
clarify the problem belong in the Background section.
If you are thinking about collecting data on a sensitive topic or from a vulnerable
population, an early consultation with the Institutional Review Board (IRB; IRB@waldenu.edu)
during your prospectus writing process is recommended to gain ethics guidance that you can
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 7
incorporate into your subsequent proposal drafts and research planning. Find more information
on the IRB Guides and FAQs page.
Limitations, Challenges, and/or Barriers
Provide information on limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be
addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to participants, access to data,
separation of roles (researcher versus employee), instrumentation fees, etc.
References
On a new page, list your references formatted in the correct style (sixth edition of the
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, modeled at the end of this
guide) for all citations within the Dissertation Prospectus.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 8
Sample Quantitative Prospectus
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 9
1
Prospectus
Differences in the Quality of Problem Statements Written Throughout the Capstone Process
Alpha B. Gamma
General Studies program – General specialization
A00000000
[Per Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
formatting, include page numbers at the top right corner of each page.]
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 10
2
Prospectus: Differences in the Quality of Problem Statements Written Throughout the Capstone
Process
Problem Statement
Conducting a supervised independent research project is a unique feature of completing a
doctoral degree (Lovitts, 2008; Luse, Mennecke, & Townsend, 2012). Contrary to the commonly
held belief of a 50% all-but-dissertation (ABD) rate, only approximately 20% of doctoral
students are unable to complete the dissertation after finishing their coursework (Lovitts, 2008;
Wendler et al., 2010). The challenge of the dissertation is not a new phenomenon in higher
education, but what is new is the growing number of students who complete their academic
programs online (Allen & Seaman, 2007; Kumar, Johnson, & Hardemon, 2013). Although many
students are ultimately successful in defining the central argument for a doctoral capstone, how
this process occurs in a distributed environment has not been well researched.
In their book on doctoral education, Walker, Golde, Jones, Conklin- Bueschel, and
Hutchings (2009) highlight the need to develop more “pedagogies of research” (p. 151) for
teaching graduate students to be scholars. Although a modest body of scholarship exists on
research training in traditional programs, emerging research suggests that the online environment
offers some unique challenges and opportunities for doctoral students (Baltes, Hoffman-Kipp,
Lynn, & Weltzer-Ward, 2010; Kumar et al., 2013; Lim, Dannels, & Watkins, 2008). Of the
many aspects of a research project, development of the problem statement is arguably a key step
because it provides the rationale for the entire dissertation (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013; Luse et
al., 2012). Hence, this study will fill a gap in the research by focusing specifically on the
development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 11
3
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements
written by doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral
studies. Secondary data that include objective ratings of problem statements by doctoral faculty
over the course of the capstone process will be examined for differences. This project is unique
because it addresses an underresearched area of higher education (Gardner & Barnes, 2014) with
a group of learners that has expanded over the past decade (Bell, 2011).
Significance
The results of this study will provide much-needed insights into the processes by which
increasing numbers of new scholars work through the beginning phase of their research. Insights
from this study should aid doctoral committees in helping students to succeed in their final
projects, thus supporting eventual degree attainment. Education has long been a force for social
change by addressing inequities in society. Because a broad range of students attend online
institutions, supporting their successful attainment of a terminal degree allows for increased
diversity among individuals in key academic and scholarly leadership positions.
Background
Selected articles relating to doctoral education and the process of learning to be a
researcher are described here. The keywords searched were ABD, online doctoral program
completion, doctoral capstone completion, online research training, and online learning in the
databases Education Source, ERIC, and SAGE Journals, as well as in a Thoreau multidatabase
search.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 12
4
1. Baltes et al. (2010) and Bieschke (2006) provided information on research self-efficacy,
which has been shown as a key predictor of the future research of doctoral students.
2. Gelso (2006), Holmes (2009), Hilliard (2013), and Kim and Karau (2009) provided
different views of strategies to support the development of scholar practitioners during
the capstone experience.
3. Ivankova and Stick (2007) and Kumar et al. (2013) offered models that align well with
the possible methodologies used in this study and that involved online students.
4. Lim et al. (2008) addressed the role of research courses in an online program.
5. Lovitts (2008), Gardner and Barnes (2014), and Werner and Rogers (2013) gave different
views of the transition from student to researcher.
6. Ismail, Majid, and Ismail (2013); Spaulding and Rockinson-Szapkiw (2012); and Stubb,
Pyhältö, and Lonka (2014) focused on the student experience of learning to conduct
research.
Framework
The theoretical base for this study will be Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological
development. Because this theory addresses ways of knowing in adults, Perry’s theoretical work
has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with
undergraduates than with doctoral students. The approach provides details on cognitive-
structural changes that emerge as a result of development and learning. Further, subsequent
research and application of Perry’s theory offer guidance on ways to facilitate academic
development, thus allowing for insight into the pedagogical challenge of the dissertation
(Gardner, 2009).
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 13
5
Research Question(s) and Hypotheses
RQ–Quantitative: Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences
in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study
process?
H01—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are no statistically significant
differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral
study process.
H1—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are statistically significant
differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral
study process.
Nature of the Study
The nature of this study will be quantitative research with a repeated-measure design
consistent with understanding how students approach the work of creating a successful doctoral
study problem statement, which is the primary focus of this doctoral study. To elucidate how a
viable research problem emerges, objective ratings of student work products will be examined
across time. This quantitative analysis should help pinpoint the amount of growth from the
beginning to the end of the project.
Possible Types and Sources of Data
Data will be accessed from an online doctoral program. The program collects and rates
doctoral problem statements written at four key points in a doctoral student’s career: the premise,
the prospectus, the proposal, and the doctoral study writing stage. The data will be deidentified
and contain the scores by stage of program for 300 online doctoral students. Other data may be
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 14
6
collected from surveys of instructors.
Limitations, Challenges, and/or Barriers
A potential barrier, if using secondary data, is that data access may include a partner-site
agreement and possible fees for data access. A potential barrier for collecting primary data
(surveys) includes recruitment of participants.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 15
7
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning.
Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting
research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Baltes, B., Hoffman-Kipp, P., Lynn, L., & Weltzer-Ward, L. (2010). Students’ research self-
efficacy during online doctoral research courses. Contemporary Issues in Education
Research, 3, 51–58.
Bell, N. (2011). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2000 to 2010. Washington, DC: Council of
Graduate Schools.
Bieschke, K. J. (2006). Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations:
Implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists. Journal of Career
Assessment, 14, 77–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281366
Gardner, S. K. (2009). The development of doctoral students: Phases of challenge and support.
ASHE Higher Education Report, 34, 1–127.
Gardner, S. K., & Barnes, B. J. (2014). Advising and mentoring doctoral students: A handbook.
San Bernardino, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing.
Gelso, C. J. (2006). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in
professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, S, 3–16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1931-3918.S.1.3
Hilliard, A. T. (2013). Advising doctorate candidates and candidates’ views during the
dissertation process. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 10, 7–13.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 16
8
Holmes, B. D. (2009). Re-envisioning the dissertation stage of doctoral study: Traditional
mistakes with non-traditional learners. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6(8),
9–13.
Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated” relationship: Research
students’ perspective on doctoral supervision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
90, 165–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078
Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in
educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher
Education, 48, 93–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
Kim, K., & Karau, S. (2009). Working environment and the research productivity of doctoral
students in management. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 101–106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832320903258535
Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions
of online mentoring in a doctoral program. The Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 1–
12.
Lim, J. H., Dannels, S. A., & Watkins, R. (2008). Qualitative investigation of doctoral students’
learning experiences in online research methods courses. Quarterly Review of Distance
Education, 9, 223–236.
Lovitts, B. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t, and why.
Journal of Higher Education, 79, 296–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0006
Luse, A., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A. (2012). Selecting a research topic: A framework for
doctoral students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 143–152.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 17
9
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A
scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral
candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7,
199–219.
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2014). Conceptions of research: The doctoral student
experience in three domains. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 251–264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.651449
Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Conklin-Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2009). The
formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., Millett, C., Rock, J., Bell, N., & McAllister, P. (2010).
The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States. Princeton, NJ:
Educational Testing Service.
Werner, T., & Rogers, K. (2013). Scholar-craftsmanship question-type, epistemology, culture of
inquiry, and personality-type in dissertation research design. Adult Learning, 24, 159–
166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1045159513499549
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 18
Sample Qualitative Prospectus
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 19
1
Prospectus
How Online Doctoral Students Develop a Dissertation Problem Statement
Alpha B. Gamma
General Studies program – General specialization
A00000000
[Per Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
formatting, include page numbers at the top right corner of each page.]
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 20
2
Prospectus: How Online Doctoral Students Develop a Dissertation Problem Statement
Problem Statement
Conducting a supervised independent research project is a unique feature of completing a
doctoral degree (Lovitts, 2008; Luse, Mennecke, & Townsend, 2012). Contrary to the commonly
held belief of a 50% all-but-dissertation (ABD) rate, only approximately 20% of doctoral
students are unable to complete the dissertation after finishing their coursework (Lovitts, 2008;
Wendler et al., 2010). The challenge of the dissertation is not a new phenomenon in higher
education, but what is new is the growing number of students who complete their academic
programs online (Allen & Seaman, 2007; Kumar, Johnson, & Hardemon, 2013). Although many
students are ultimately successful in defining the central argument for a doctoral capstone, how
this process occurs in a distributed environment has not been well researched.
In their book on doctoral education, Walker, Golde, Jones, Conklin- Bueschel, and
Hutchings (2009) highlight the need to develop more “pedagogies of research” (p. 152) for
teaching graduate students to be scholars. Although a modest body of scholarship exists on
research training in traditional programs, emerging research suggests that the online environment
offers some unique challenges and opportunities for doctoral students (Baltes, Hoffman-Kipp,
Lynn, & Weltzer-Ward, 2010; Kumar et al., 2013; Lim, Dannels, & Watkins, 2008). Of the
many aspects of a research project, development of the problem statement is arguably a key step
because it provides the rationale for the entire dissertation (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013; Luse et
al., 2012). Hence, this study will fill a gap in the research by focusing specifically on the
development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 21
3
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to improve the understanding of the process by which
doctoral students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.
To address this gap, the study approach will use the qualitative paradigm. Interviews will be used
to develop an understanding of students’ strategies for formulating problem statements.
Significance
This research will fill a gap in understanding by focusing specifically on development of
problem statements by students in online doctoral programs. This project is unique because it
addresses an underresearched area of higher education (Gardner & Barnes, 2014) among a group
of learners that has expanded over the past decade (Bell, 2011). The results of this study will
provide much-needed insights into the processes by which increasing numbers of new scholars
work through the beginning phase of their research. Insights from this study should aid doctoral
committees and academic programs in helping students to succeed in their final projects, thus
supporting eventual degree attainment. Education has long been a force for social change by
addressing inequities in society. Because a broad range of students attends online institutions,
supporting their successful attainment of a terminal degree allows for increased diversity among
individuals in key academic and scholarly leadership positions.
Background
Selected articles relating to doctoral education and the process of learning to be a
researcher are described here. The keywords searched were ABD, online doctoral program
completion, doctoral capstone completion, online research training, and online learning in the
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 22
4
databases Education Source, ERIC, and SAGE Journals, as well as in a Thoreau multidatabase
search.
1. Baltes et al. (2010) and Bieschke (2006) provided information on research self-
efficacy, which has been shown as a key predictor of the future research of doctoral
students.
2. Gelso (2006), Holmes (2009), Hilliard (2013), and Kim and Karau (2009) provided
different views of strategies to support the development of scholar practitioners
during the capstone experience.
3. Ivankova and Stick (2007) and Kumar et al. (2013) offered models that align well
with the possible methodologies used in this study and that involved online students.
4. Lim et al. (2008) addressed the role of research courses in an online program.
5. Lovitts (2008), Gardner and Barnes (2014), and Werner and Rogers (2013) gave
different views of the transition from student to researcher.
6. Ismail, Majid, and Ismail (2013); Spaulding and Rockinson-Szapkiw (2012); and
Stubb, Pyhältö, and Lonka (2014) focused on the student experience of learning to
conduct research.
Framework
The framework for this study will be based on Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological
development. Because this theory addresses ways of knowing in adults, Perry’s theoretical work
has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with
undergraduates than with doctoral students. Concepts explored will include what online learning
is and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing. The
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 23
5
approach provides details on cognitive-structural changes that emerge as a result of development
and learning. Further, subsequent research and application of Perry’s theory offers guidance on
ways to facilitate academic development, thus allowing for insight into the pedagogical
challenge of the dissertation (Gardner, 2009).
Research Question(s)
RQ–Qualitative: For students with a high-quality problem statement at
the dissertation stage, what themes emerge in their reports of the process that they used to
develop it?
Nature of the Study
The nature of this study will be qualitative with a generic qualitative approach (Merriam
& Tisdell, 2015). Qualitative research is consistent with understanding how students approach
the work of creating a successful dissertation problem statement, which is the focus of this
dissertation. Keeping the focus on how students make sense of their dissertation research should
be consistent with Perry’s (1970) epistemological expectations at this point in their development
(Gardner, 2009).
Possible Types and Sources of Data
Data for the study will include interviews with a representative group of doctoral
graduates who have successfully defended their dissertations and whose work was highly ranked
by faculty. In addition, the design may include, as a possible source for triangulation, interviews
with doctoral faculty who have helped students to succeed.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 24
6
Limitations, Challenges, and/or Barriers
Potential barriers include the partner site agreement and possible difficulty recruiting
participants for interviews. Ensuring clear separation of my role at the institution from my role as
researcher may also be a challenge.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 25
7
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning.
Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting
research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Baltes, B., Hoffman-Kipp, P., Lynn, L., & Weltzer-Ward, L. (2010). Students’ research self-
efficacy during online doctoral research courses. Contemporary Issues in Education
Research, 3, 51–58.
Bell, N. (2011). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2000 to 2010. Washington, DC: Council of
Graduate Schools.
Bieschke, K. J. (2006). Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations:
Implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists. Journal of Career
Assessment, 14, 77–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281366
Gardner, S. K. (2009). The development of doctoral students: Phases of challenge and support.
ASHE Higher Education Report, 34, 1–127.
Gardner, S. K., & Barnes, B. J. (2014). Advising and mentoring doctoral students: A handbook.
San Bernardino, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing.
Gelso, C. J. (2006). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in
professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, S, 3–16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1931-3918.S.1.3
Hilliard, A. T. (2013). Advising doctorate candidates and candidates’ views during the
dissertation process. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 10, 7–13.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 26
8
Holmes, B. D. (2009). Re-envisioning the dissertation stage of doctoral study: Traditional
mistakes with non-traditional learners. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6(8),
9–13.
Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated” relationship: Research
students’ perspective on doctoral supervision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
90, 165–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078
Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in
educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher
Education, 48, 93–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
Kim, K., & Karau, S. (2009). Working environment and the research productivity of doctoral
students in management. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 101–106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832320903258535
Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions
of online mentoring in a doctoral program. The Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 1–
12.
Lim, J. H., Dannels, S. A., & Watkins, R. (2008). Qualitative investigation of doctoral students’
learning experiences in online research methods courses. Quarterly Review of Distance
Education, 9, 223–236.
Lovitts, B. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t, and why.
Journal of Higher Education, 79, 296–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0006
Luse, A., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A. (2012). Selecting a research topic: A framework for
doctoral students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 143–152.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 27
9
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and
implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A
scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral
candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7,
199–219.
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2014). Conceptions of research: The doctoral student
experience in three domains. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 251–264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.651449
Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Conklin-Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2009). The
formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., Millett, C., Rock, J., Bell, N., & McAllister, P. (2010).
The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States. Princeton, NJ:
Educational Testing Service.
Werner, T., & Rogers, K. (2013). Scholar-craftsmanship question-type, epistemology, culture of
inquiry, and personality-type in dissertation research design. Adult Learning, 24, 159–
166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1045159513499549
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 28
Quality Indicators Nine key indicators have been identified to assure the overall quality of the dissertation project at
this point in its development. Supervisory committee members will use these indicators to give
ongoing feedback and to document their final evaluation of the Dissertation Prospectus in
MyDR. Students should use these indicators to guide development of their prospectus.
Dissertation Prospectus Rubric
A Dissertation Prospectus shows the potential of leading to a doctoral-quality dissertation only if
the answer to all of the following standards is “Met” on the rubric.
1. Complete? Does the prospectus contain all the required elements? Refer to the annotated outline to see
the required parts of the Dissertation Prospectus document.
2. Meaningful? Has a meaningful problem or gap in the research literature been identified? In other words,
is addressing this problem the logical next step, given the previous exploratory and
confirmatory research (or lack thereof) on this topic? It is not acceptable to simply replicate
previous research for a PhD degree.
3. Justified? Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional
field? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence, documentable
discrepancies, and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the
problem.
4. Grounded? Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously
published findings on the topic? For most fields, grounding involves articulating the problem
within the context of a theoretical base or conceptual framework. Although many approaches
can ground a study in the scientific literature, the essential requirement is that the problem is
framed such that the new findings will have implications for the previous findings.
5. Original? Does this project have potential to make an original contribution? The problem must be an
authentic “puzzle” that needs solving, not merely a topic that the researcher finds interesting.
Addressing the problem should result in an original contribution to the field or discipline.
6. Impact? Does this project have potential to affect positive social change? As described in the
Significance section (see annotated outline), the anticipated findings have potential to support
the mission of Walden University to promote positive social change.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 29
7. Feasible? Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach
have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens
placed on research participants? The tentative methodology demonstrates that the researcher
has considered the options for inquiry, selected an approach that has potential to address the
problem, and considered potential risks and burdens placed on research participants.
8. Aligned? Do the various aspects of the prospectus align overall? The nature of the study should align
with the problem, research questions, and tentative approaches to inquiry.
9. Objective? Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not
reveal bias or present a foregone conclusion. Even if the researcher has a strong opinion on
the expected findings, the researcher must maximize scholarly objectivity by framing the
problem in the context of a systematic inquiry that permits multiple possible conclusions.
Self-Check Item on Partner Site Masking
Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization. The methodological
and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined in Guidance on
Masking Partner Organizations in Walden Capstones.
If you perceive that your partner organization’s identity would be impossible to mask or if there
is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, the program director must
review your request for an exception. If granted, that exception will need to be confirmed by the
IRB during the ethics review process. The IRB will also ensure that your consent form(s) and/or
site agreement(s) permit naming the organization.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 30
Ten Tips for Writing a Quality Prospectus Prospectuses tend to be as unique as the students writing them, so specific strategies are hard to
offer. Based on a recent institutional analysis, the following general tips are provided to support
successful approval. Students should ensure they can answer “Yes” to the following questions.
1. Is it complete? One of the most common reasons that a prospectus is sent back is one of the simplest to
fix: Some pieces are missing. You should ask yourself, “Did I effectively respond to every
item on the annotated outline?”
2. Is it well written? Your prospectus is the first time that your scholarly writing style is on full display for
your committee. The prospectus needs to be a preview of what they can expect when they
agree to work with you. Certainly, if your writing is unclear, your supervisory committee
will have a difficult time ascertaining whether you have met the quality indicators. If you
need added support with your writing, now is the time to find it. The Walden Writing
Center offers webinars and multimedia resources to assist students with improving their
academic writing, and the Academic Skills Center offers courses to help students
improve their writing skills. If you need refreshers and support with key research
concepts, the Center for Research Quality site has additional resources.
3. Are the parts and sections aligned? Of all the quality indicators, alignment tends to be one of the more challenging because it
transcends the content in the prospectus. Some examples of misalignment are as follows:
research on children has been reviewed when the study is concerned with adults, the
intended sample group does not seem appropriate to provide information to answer the
research question, and the study is labeled as qualitative even though the intention is to
draw inferences from a statistical test of group differences. Importantly, all the parts—not
just some—need to align.
4. Is the topic relevant to my discipline and program of study? Doctoral students are encouraged to explore scholarship from a variety of disciplines as
they formulate their questions. When choosing their actual research topic, however, they
need to be especially careful to not go beyond their own disciplinary program of study
area.
5. Did I answer the “So what?” question? Too often, what is obvious to the student is not always captured in what is written in the
prospectus. Ironically, one area that seems to get neglected is the social change statement,
because the writer assumes that the reader understands the full impact of the situation and
how this research will have potential for a positive impact. Make sure you are clear on
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 31
why so many people, including your committee and your participants, will need to invest
their time in this project.
6. Is the prospectus presented in an objective manner? Students are encouraged to develop a deep understanding of the problem and the people
affected by it. When coupled with experiences gained through one’s work as a
practitioner, however, it is tempting to lose sight of researcher objectivity. It is certainly
acceptable to have a hypothesis based on your understanding of the research literature,
but you should not suggest an answer before you have started the study (“I want to prove
this point”) or offer solutions before the study has been completed (“I know what needs
to happen here”).
7. Did I do my “homework”? Although the prospectus sets the stage for a more in-depth examination of a research
topic, students are still expected to conduct a preliminary literature review. Be careful not
to equate “Here’s a gap in the research” with “I haven’t looked at the research.” Students
are sometimes shocked at how much research has already been done on a topic after they
start digging into it, even if more research is eventually needed.
8. Have I identified a research question? A common mistake that new researchers make is to confuse the broader social problem
with the research question that will be the focus of the dissertation, because the two are
related. Although much is often known about the scope and nature of the social problem
(e.g., incident rates, outcomes), less information may be available on how to address the
social problem, or it would not be a problem. What is often lacking in the situation is
some piece of information or understanding that can be used to address the social
problem. That question or gap is what your research will address.
9. Is my topic too broad? Most doctoral students have overly ambitious research goals at the beginning, and we
rarely have to ask someone to “do more.” Usually, the struggle is to identify a focused,
doable question that fits within in the expectations of a dissertation. Exploring the
existing research literature for similar studies is one way to see how other researchers
have shaped their questions. Keep in mind that a tightly conceived, well-executed study
of one robust research question is better than a dissertation that tries to answer a bunch of
tangentially related questions with a variety of methods.
10. Have you considered the feasibility of the study? The prospectus is a plan to develop the proposal, and the proposal is where many key
research decisions are finalized. Still, it is never too early to start thinking about the
feasibility of conducting the study, which is why it is one of the quality indicators. Like
all the indicators, feasibility is a quality that you will revisit as the project evolves. At the
prospectus stage, you need to show your supervisory committee that you are considering
your choices in light of previous scholarship and what you have learned about the
research process in your courses.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 32
Sample Quantitative Prospectus in the Historic Alignment Tool (HAT) The HAT is a tool that is introduced in Residency 3 to help students see the alignment in their
prospectus and to track the changes they have made along the way. What follows is a HAT that might
have been developed for the Sample Quantitative Prospectus that appears in this guide.
Problem Statement
There is a lack of information on how online doctoral students develop their research problem and
whether the quality of the problem statement varies over time.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements written by
doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral studies.
Potential Significance
Results may help promote the success of online doctoral students.
Research Questions and Hypotheses
RQ–Quantitative: Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences in the overall
quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process?
H01—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are no statistically significant differences
in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.
H1—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are statistically significant differences in
the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.
Theories or Conceptual Frameworks
Perry’s theory of epistemological development
Method of Inquiry
Quantitative
Data Collection
Ratings by faculty members
Data Analysis Method
To be determined
Implications for Positive Social Change
Online education has expanded the reach of higher education to a more diverse group of learners, many
of whom serve in key leadership roles. These results may support their success and eventual
advancement.
Dissertation Prospectus Guide Page 33
Sample Qualitative Prospectus in the Historic Alignment Tool (HAT) The HAT is a tool that is introduced in Residency 3 to help students see the alignment in their
prospectus and to track the changes they have made along the way. What follows is a HAT that
might have been developed for the Sample Qualitative Prospectus that appears in this guide.
Problem Statement
There is a lack of information on how online doctoral students go about developing their
research problem statement for their dissertations.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to improve the understanding of the process by which doctoral
students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.
Potential Significance
Results may help promote the success of online doctoral students.
Research Questions and Hypotheses
RQ–Qualitative: For students with a high-quality problem statement at the dissertation stage,
what themes emerge in their reports of the process that they used to develop it?
Theories or Conceptual Frameworks
Perry’s theory of epistemological development along with the concepts of
online education and pedagogical challenges in the online environment.
Method of Inquiry
Qualitative with a generic qualitative approach.
Data Collection
Interviews with students and possibly interviews
with faculty
Data Analysis Method
To be determined
Implications for Positive Social Change
Online education has expanded the reach of higher education to a more diverse group of learners,
many of whom serve in key leadership roles. These results may support their success and
eventual advancement.