Phase 2
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction and conclusion
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
The introduction is succinct and embodies the project’s primary objectives and outcomes. The introduction constructs the purpose of the system. A compelling and justifiable conclusion is developed that supports the key outcomes. More than 5 scholarly sources and 500 words combined.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
The introduction and conclusion are succinct and embody most of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes, and/or the introduction constructs an unclear purpose of the system. Justified conclusion developed. Minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The introduction and/or conclusion are generalized and embody some of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes and/or has less than the minimum of 5 scholarly sources and 500 words and/or is not defensible.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially unmet or not present
10 pts
Literature review and systems design methods
50 to >45.0 pts
Advanced
Systems analysis and design literature review and methodology is accurate, feasible, and addresses the key deliverables of the project including a highly innovative, available, scalable, and secure information systems cloud solution. Literature results and methods are properly contrasted and are specific and relevant to the problem. They detail the standards used and how these will benchmark the systems. Over 2,000 words and 15 unique scholarly journal articles that justify the methodology, its reliability, and its validity in comparing and contrasting the information systems.
45 to >41.0 pts
Proficient
Systems analysis and design literature review and methodology is mostly accurate, feasible, and addresses the key deliverables of the project including a highly innovative, available, scalable, and secure information systems cloud solution and/or literature results and methods are contrasted and somewhat specific and relevant to the problem and/or detail some standards used and how these will benchmark the systems and/or minimum of 2,000 words and 15 unique scholarly journal articles that justify the methodology, its reliability, and its validity in comparing and contrasting the information systems.
41 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Systems analysis and design literature review and methodology is not always accurate, feasible, and/or is missing the key deliverables of the project including a highly innovative, available, scalable, and secure information systems cloud solution and/or literature results and methods are not contrasted and/or not specific and/or relevant to the problem and/or benchmarking is inadequate and/or less than 2,000 words and 15 unique scholarly journal articles that justify the methodology, its reliability, and its validity in comparing and contrasting the information systems.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially unmet or not present and/or quotes more than 5% of the writing or use of existing information system
50 pts
Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 2 Grading Rubric | BMIS530_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Systems analysis and design
80 to >73.0 pts
Advanced
Use case diagrams (2), written use cases / use case descriptions (2), activity diagrams (2), and sequence diagrams (2) are more thorough and detailed than the textbook examples, follow appropriate and advanced UML techniques, and meet comparative industry best practices and standards. Diagrams show an extensive knowledge of the system being designed. Minimum of 5 success scenarios and 10 extensions exist in each use case along with proper sub-flows and alternatives. Minimum of 10 activities exist with accurate associated decisions, swim lanes, guards, parallel activities, and proper object-oriented strategies to address distributed computing. Minimum of 5 objects exist in each sequence diagram with accurate associated lifelines, execution occurrences, messages, frames, guards, functions, loops, and proper object-oriented strategies to address distributed computing.
73 to >66.0 pts
Proficient
Use case diagrams (2), written use cases / use case descriptions (2), activity diagrams (2), and/or sequence diagrams (2) are as detailed as the textbook examples, follow appropriate and advanced UML techniques, and meet comparative industry best practices and standards and/or diagrams show knowledge of the system being designed. Most minimums are met including 5 success scenarios and 10 extensions in each use case along with proper sub-flows and alternatives and/or 10 activities exist with accurate associated decisions, swim lanes, guards, parallel activities, and proper object-oriented strategies to address distributed computing and/or the minimum of 5 objects exist in each sequence diagram with mostly accurate associated lifelines, execution occurrences, messages, frames, guards, functions, loops, and proper object-oriented strategies to address distributed computing.
66 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Use case diagrams (2), written use cases / use case descriptions (2), activity diagrams (2), and/or sequence diagrams (2) are not as detailed as the textbook examples and/or do not follow appropriate UML techniques and/or do not meet comparative industry best practices and standards and/or diagrams fail to show knowledge of the system being designed and/or minimums are not met including 5 success scenarios and 10 extensions in each use case along with proper sub-flows and alternatives and/or 10 activities exist with accurate associated decisions, swim lanes, guards, parallel activities, and proper object-oriented strategies to address distributed computing and/or the minimum of 5 objects does not exist in each sequence diagram with associated lifelines, execution occurrences, messages, frames, guards, functions, loops, and proper object-oriented strategies to address distributed computing.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially unmet or not present or proper screenshots do not exist for each diagram or use of existing information system
80 pts
Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 2 Grading Rubric | BMIS530_D01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
APA, Grammar, and Spelling
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Properly formatted APA paper with table of contents and references pages. Correct spelling and grammar used. Contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. Excellent organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
Paper contains fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or some errors (3-7) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Paper contains fewer than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (7+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist and/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.
0 pts
Not Present
Paper contains more than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and/or numerous errors (10+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and/or inadequate organization, headings, and flow of the main concepts exist.
20 pts
Overall Requirements
40 to >36.0 pts
Advanced
Over 2,500 words and 8 diagrams exist of original student authorship that shows excellent mastery and knowledge of systems analysis and design. Over 15 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that directly relate to and sufficiently support an operational systems analysis and design.
36 to >33.0 pts
Proficient
Minimum of 2,500 words and 8 diagrams exist of original student authorship that shows mastery and knowledge of systems analysis and design. 15 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals exist that relate to and sufficiently support an operational systems analysis and design.
33 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Less than 2,500 words and 8 diagrams exist of original student authorship that shows mastery and knowledge of systems analysis and design and/or there are less than 15 unique scholarly peer reviewed journal articles from well-respected IT journals that relate to and sufficiently support an operational systems analysis and design.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially unmet or not present or proper screenshots do not exist for each diagram or use of existing information system
40 pts
Total Points: 200
Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 2 Grading Rubric | BMIS530_D01_202130