Personal Learning Theory
Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Accomplished Proficient Emerging Unsatisfactory
Reflection 20 (20.00%) The reflection articulates multiple connections between this learning experience and content from other courses, past learning, life experiences and/or future goals. Reflection contains references from required readings and own research.
15 (15.00%) The reflection articulates connections between this learning experience and content from other courses, past learning experiences, and/or future goals. Reflection contains references from required readings or own research.
10 (10.00%) The reflection attempts to articulate connections between this learning experience and content from other courses, past learning experiences, or personal goals, but the connection is vague and/or unclear. Reflection contains few references from required readings and own research.
0 (0.00%) The reflection does not articulate any connection to other learning or experiences.
Philosophical or Theoretical Grounding
50 (50.00%) The candidate makes high level connections between one’s teaching philosophy and noted educational theories or philosophies. A deep understanding of relevant educational theory and philosophy is demonstrated. The candidate offers a critical analysis of the theory. Reflection contains references from required readings and own research.
40 (40.00%) The candidate makes connections between one’s teaching philosophy and noted educational theories or philosophies with reasonable association. A working understanding of relevant educational theory or philosophy is exhibited with minimal mistakes. Reflection contains references from required readings or own research.
20 (20.00%) The candidate attempts to make connects between one’s teaching philosophy and noted educational philosophies or theories, but with limited or illogical associations. Clear misconceptions are exhibited. Reflection contains few references from required readings and own research.
10 (10.00%) The candidate does not demonstrate an understanding of relevant educational theories or philosophies.
Support For Student Learning
20 (20.00%) The candidate addresses issues of support for the diverse needs of learners in a compelling and coherent manner. All strategies are based on a combination of practical experience, theory, and research. Reflection contains references from required readings and own research.
15 (15.00%) The candidate addresses issues support for the diverse needs of learner, with minimal misconceptions. Most strategies are based on a combination of practical experience, theory and research. Reflection contains references from required readings or own research.
10 (10.00%) The candidate attempts to address issues support for the diverse needs of learner, but in an awkward way. The examples provided appear to address the learners’ needs only limitedly. Reflection contains few references from required readings and own research.
0 (0.00%) There is no connection to teaching and support for students’ learning.
Mechanics and APA Formatting
10 (10.00%) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) were flawless, and the composition itself was professional, well organized, and well written. APA formatting is used without error.
7 (7.00%) One error in mechanics or formatting.
5 (5.00%) Two errors in mechanics or formatting
0 (0.00%) Three or more errors in mechanics or formatting
Name: Personal Learning Theory Rubric
Description: to be used to grade the Personal Learning Theory in EDPR 600 ExitExit
Grid View List View
Name:Personal Learning Theory Rubric
Description:to be used to grade the Personal Learning Theory in EDPR 600 ExitExit