English 122 help
Respond to 2 peers engaging with the peer and asking questions.
Peer 1:
(Nadia S)
Konrad Szocik, a certified space philosopher at Yale University released this article in 2020 talking about the challenges of Space Exploration, one of them being space colonization. This article is biased but backed with properly sourced research and experiments from previous scientists. The majority of his article specifically the topic of space colonization is trying to create a new opening conversation with the challenges of space exploration and its effect on humans. Konrad Szocik also opened a conversation about possible solutions and other questions with space exploration using sources that clash with previous and other sources in perspective.
.Though this second source, a book from 2012 features the problems of space exploration, it also highlights the necessity of it as well, especially space colonization. It contrasts well with my first chosen article. S.V. Krichevskiy is a Doctor philosopher, a professor at the Institute for the History of Science and Technology in Moscow, Russia. He is a reliable professor with credible sources to his name. Within his research article, he proved many credible sources from his own research.
It was difficult to find two sources that contrast each other, especially finding a specific subtopic of space exploration. These two articles work well because they both highlight the contrasting perspective of space exploration that many of us don’t critically think about through philosophy and research. The first article talks about how hard space exploration will be for humans while the second one also introduced why it is necessary.
Work Cited
Szocik, Konrad, et al. “Ethical Challenges in Human Space Missions: A Space Refuge,
Scientific Value, and Human Gene Editing for Space.” Science & Engineering
Ethics, vol. 26, no. 3, June 2020, pp. 1209–27. EBSCOhost,
https://doi-org.ccco.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00131-1.
Krichevskiy S. V. “Space Colonization: Problems and Prospects.” Философия и
Космология, vol. 11, no. 1, Apr. 2012, pp. 135–43. EBSCOhost,
https://search-ebscohost-com.ccco.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eds
oj&AN=edsdoj.1a5da8c483004183841a622bd6f971d5&site=eds-live&scope=site
less
Peer 2: Brennen M)
The first article I found is from New York Times. It was posted in 2018, so its fairly recent, and is recent enough for my topic. This source shows 5 different maps that show the opinions of U.S. citizens on various climate change topics. This article was written by Nadja Popovich, a journalist who has worked for various other newspapers before. This article is mostly fact, with no bias or persuasion at all.
The second article I found comes from the British Journal of Politics & International Relations. The article was posted in 2020, so it’s only a few years old, which works well for my topic This source uses a lot of different types of information, such as surveys, graphs, other articles, and more. It also includes references to the data and quotations it uses. This article was written by Sam Crawley, Hilde Coffee, and Ralph Chapman, and all three have a background in environmental topics. I would say that BJPIR is a good source of information. It takes quite a few steps to even have a paper that can be published, so nobody can easily put false information onto the articles. The source is factual, provides a lot of evidence, and has very little bias.
I feel that these articles work fairly well together. Some people may question the true credibility of the first article, but it works for the topic being discussed. They are both credible sources that show two different topics about climate change. One talks about how people feel about climate change, while the other talks about how the government isn’t doing much about climate change, and why people lose awareness of climate change.
Works Cited
Crawley, Sam, et al. “Public Opinion on Climate Change: Belief and Concern, Issue Salience and Support for Government Action.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations, vol. 22, no. 1, Feb. 2020, pp. 102–21. EBSCOhost, doi-org.ccco.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1369148119888827.
Popovich, Nadja. “Where Americans (Mostly) Agree on Climate Change Policies, in Five Maps.” New York Times, vol. 168, no. 58135, 3 Nov. 2018, p. A13. EBSCOhost, search-ebscohost-com.ccco.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=132831623&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
less
Respond to 2 peers en
gaging with the peer and asking questions.
Peer 1:
(
Nadia S
)
Konrad
Szocik,
a
certified
space
philosopher
at
Yale
University
released
this
article
in
2020
talkin
g
about
the
challenges
of
Space
Exploration,
one
of
them
being
space
colonization.
This
article
is
biased
but
backed
with
properly
sourced
research
and
experiments
from
previous
scientists.
The
majority
of
his
article
specifically
the
topic
of
space
coloni
zation
is
trying
to
create
a
new
opening
conversation
with
the
challenges
of
space
exploration
and
its
effect
on
humans.
Konrad
Szocik
also
opened
a
conversation
about
possible
solutions
and
other
questions
with
space
exploration
using
sources
that
clash
w
ith
previous
and
other
sources
in
perspective.
.Though
this
second
source,
a
book
from
2012
features
the
problems
of
space
exploration,
it
also
highlights
the
necessity
of
it
as
well,
especially
space
colonization.
It
contrasts
well
with
my
first
chosen
article.
S.V.
Krichevskiy
is
a
Doctor
philosopher,
a
professor
at
the
Institute
for
the
History
of
Science
and
Technology
in
Moscow,
Russia.
He
is
a
reliable
professor
with
credible
sources
to
his
name.
Within
his
research
article,
he
proved
many
credible
sources
from
his
own
research.
It
was
difficult
to
find
two
sources
that
contrast
each
other,
especially
finding
a
specific
subtopic
of
space
exploration.
These
two
articles
work
well
because
they
both
highlight
the
contrasting
perspective
of
space
exploration
that
many
of
us
don’t
crit
ically
think
about
Respond to 2 peers engaging with the peer and asking questions.
Peer 1:
(Nadia S)
Konrad Szocik, a certified space philosopher at Yale University released this article in
2020 talking about the challenges of Space Exploration, one of them being space
colonization. This article is biased but backed with properly sourced research and
experiments from previous scientists. The majority of his article specifically the topic of
space colonization is trying to create a new opening conversation with the challenges of
space exploration and its effect on humans. Konrad Szocik also opened a conversation
about possible solutions and other questions with space exploration using sources that
clash with previous and other sources in perspective.
.Though this second source, a book from 2012 features the problems of space
exploration, it also highlights the necessity of it as well, especially space colonization. It
contrasts well with my first chosen article. S.V. Krichevskiy is a Doctor philosopher, a
professor at the Institute for the History of Science and Technology in Moscow, Russia.
He is a reliable professor with credible sources to his name. Within his research article,
he proved many credible sources from his own research.
It was difficult to find two sources that contrast each other, especially finding a specific
subtopic of space exploration. These two articles work well because they both highlight
the contrasting perspective of space exploration that many of us don’t critically think about