EP-1: Draft for Peer Review
Topic Proposal Rubric
|
|
Exceptional (A-level work)
|
Effective (B-level work) |
Inconsistent (C-level work)
|
Inadequate (D/F-level work) |
|
Concise discussion of subject
|
Provides a clear and sophisticated introduction to the topic; conversant with key terms/language relevant to the topic; draws on quality facts and stats to offer context and background
|
Provides an interesting, if more general, introduction to the topic; may leave readers with some questions after reading; provides facts and stats for context and background
|
Provides an introduction to the topic based on broad or popular knowledge; no outside sources used |
Introduction lacks specificity and development; may be unclear or unfinished. |
|
Clear statement of intended focus
|
Research questions are complex and clearly stated; direction of research is explicit and well designed. |
Research questions are meaningful, though they may require further development; direction of research is presented, if vaguely. |
Research questions lack development and do not demonstrate sufficient background research on the topic; direction of research is not clear. |
Research questions are surface or missing altogether; little or no direction for research is outlined. |
|
Rationale for choosing subject |
Reasons for choosing this topic are clearly and articulately expressed, and suggest a thoughtful selection process. |
Reasons for choosing this topic are clearly expressed. |
Reasons for choosing the topic are unclear or need to be inferred from other parts of the proposal. |
Rationale is missing or suggests only a surface interest in the topic.
|
|
Mention of key resources
|
Quality academic sources are discussed and demonstrate comprehensive background research. |
Quality sources are discussed and demonstrate meaningful background research, if limited. |
Sources are discussed, but they don’t reflect much academic research. |
No sources are mentioned or are done so in a limited or superficial way. |
|
Required elements
|
All elements of the assignment are covered in detail, including research questions, names and titles of possible interview subjects, and survey topics.
|
All elements of the assignment are present, but may lack detail and/or sufficient discussion of purpose.
|
One item missing entirely from the proposal.
|
More than one item missing entirely from the proposal.
|