Ashley Claire-Public Health Finance-1

Criteria

Exemplary - 100%

Satisfactory - 80-99%

Partially Met - 40-79%

Attempted - 1-39%

Not Evident - 0%

Context

35%

Context is comprehensive and illuminates significant details about the organization.

Snapshots provide context for the target organizations.

Snapshots draw from news about the organization, organizational history, organizational involvement in any initiatives, and any regional policies/incentives/ initiatives/etc. in order to do so.

Snapshot  doesn’t draw from all the sources it could in order to provide an adequate context for understanding the organization.

Snapshot provides little context, or context goes largely unsupported by sources.

No attempt to provide context for organization.

Identity

35%

In addition to "Satisfactory," snapshots paint a simple but complete picture of the organizations, so that they can be easily distinguished and compared.

Snapshots distill what was requested for the CEO(s) at UNM to understand of each organization.

Snapshots distill some of the useful information requested, but there  is some essential information missing.  

Snapshots incomplete or many details unclear.

Snapshot not submitted.  

Mechanics / Grammar

15%

There are no errors in grammar or mechanics.

There are a few errors in grammar and/or mechanics, but they are minor.

There are enough errors in grammar and/or mechanics to distract, sometimes, from the document’s intention.

There are regular, serious errors in grammar and/or mechanics.

The grammar and/or mechanics contain enough errors to regularly confuse the document’s meaning.

AMA Formatting and Citation

15%

The paper is formatted correctly, all sources cited correctly, with no errors.

Paper is formatted correctly and all sources used are cited correctly with one or two minor errors.

Several errors in citation or AMA style formatting.

Recurring errors in the AMA formatting suggest a lack of fluency with AMA style.

No sources cited, or document not formatted using AMA style.