|
Please note - I attached a mark up for you. Your goals are not really reflective of a measurable goal. You need to have more clear and specific goals that use terms such as "reduce" "prevent" "improve" etc.... Your listed goals were more ideas then goals or actual functions .
THE PPT will need to be changed to reflect your new goals as well
REVIEW my attachment and then also fix and improve the PPT to reflect new goals.
Learning Objective 1.1: Identify opportunities for process improvement and cost reduction in an emergency department.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Presentation identifies fewer than five opportunities for process improvement and cost reduction in the emergency department, or the opportunities are not relevant to the case presented. An explanation is given for how each opportunity relates to national benchmark rates. Response is not supported by references to academic/professional resources or the resources are not relevant.
|
|
Additional Comments:The areas you chose are written more like general solutions or functions rather then actual benchmark goals
|
Learning Objective 1.2: Compare national benchmark rates for emergency room waste to rates in specific healthcare contexts.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Presentation clearly and accurately compares national benchmark rates to the rates of each of the five areas identified for improvement in the case presented. Presentation uses a combination of text and graphics/charts to show comparisons between national benchmark rates and the rates in the case presented. Response is supported by references to relevant academic/professional resources.
|
|
Additional Comments:Very little benchmark data from national sources - data that was presented was old and outdated.
|
Learning Objective 1.3: Quantify the size of waste- and cost- reduction opportunities:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response vaguely and/or inaccurately quantifies the size of three waste- and three cost- reduction opportunities, or fewer than three waste- and/or fewer than three cost- reduction opportunities are addressed. A combination of text and graphics/charts is not used to convey the size of waste- and cost-reduction opportunities. Response does not describe the impact that amount of waste has on the emergency department and on quality in the case presented, or the description is vague.
|
|
Additional Comments: this was unclear - see my mark up on the paper
|
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the impact of process and cost inefficiencies on an emergency department and on quality.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response describes fewer than three ways in which process and cost inefficiencies impact the emergency department and quality in the case presented, or the impact described is not clearly related to the inefficiency. Response is not supported by academic/professional resources and/or the resources are not relevant.
|
|
Additional Comments:while you had 3 ways - they were not accurate or align with current health care trends.
|
Learning Objective 2.1: Develop stretch goals for process and quality improvement, and for risk and cost reduction.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response states five stretch goals but they are not realistic or not aligned to the cost- and waste-reduction opportunities identified in the case presented, and/or fewer than five goals were stated. Response vaguely explains the research and analysis used to develop the goals, or the explanation is missing. Response is not supported by academic/professional resources and/or the resources are not relevant.
|
|
Additional Comments: these were not written as measurable.
|
Learning Objective 2.2: Determine methods of measuring progress and achievement of stretch goals that target process and quality improvement.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Chart clearly details how and when each stretch goal will improve processes and quality, and lower costs for the case presented.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 2.3: Determine methods of measuring progress and achievement of stretch goals that target process and quality improvement.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response describes a way to measure achievement of each stretch goal, but the method of measurement is not aligned to the goal, or methods of measurement are not given for all five goals. Response is not supported by academic/professional resources and/or the resources are not relevant.
|
|
Additional Comments: see my mark up comments - they need to align ?
|
Learning Objective 3.1: Analyze opportunities to improve the continuum of care, decrease quality risks, and eliminate redundancy.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Opportunities identified do not relate to the continuum of care, quality risk, and redundancy, or fewer than three opportunities are identified. Rationale given for targeting each of the three areas is not logical, or the rationale is missing. Response is not supported by academic/professional resources and/or the resources are not relevant.
|
|
Additional Comments:most references were outdated.
|
Learning Objective 3.2: Recommend ways for improving the continuum of care, decreasing quality risks, and eliminating redundancy in specific healthcare context.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Response clearly states three recommendations for the case presented—one for each of the areas or opportunity identified for improving the continuum of care, decreasing quality risks, and eliminating redundancy. Desired results of the recommendations are explained in quantifiable terms and are supported by references to relevant academic/professional resources.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 4.1: Define a culture of accountability and quality excellence.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Presentation clearly and accurately defines a culture of accountability and quality excellence. Response is supported by references to relevant academic/professional resources.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 4.2: Explain why a culture of accountability and quality excellence will lead to an improved patient experience and an improved work environment.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Presentation clearly and accurately explains why a culture of accountability and quality excellence will lead to an improved patient experience and an improved work environment in the case presented. Response is supported by references to relevant academic/professional resources.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 4.3: Recommend ways leadership teams can foster a culture of accountability and quality excellence.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
The recommendations are unclear, or are not aligned with fostering a culture of accountability and quality excellence, or do not relate to the case presented. Response is not supported by academic/professional resources and/or the resources are not relevant.
|
|
Additional Comments: you will need to update the presentation to reflect the new goals
|
Learning Objective 4.4: Describe the challenges of fostering a culture of accountability and excellence in healthcare environments:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Presentation clearly describes three challenges of fostering a culture of accountability and excellence in the context of the case presented. Response is supported by references to relevant academic/professional resources.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Written Communication PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Writing is loosely organized. Limited use of introductions, transitions, and conclusions provides partial continuity.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Written Communication PS 1.3: Support writing with appropriate resources.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied inconsistently.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Written Communication PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Vocabulary and tone have limited relevance to the audience.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Technology PS 3.1: Use images and layout of presentations to effectively communicate content to a specific audience.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Images and layout generally support audience understanding of key concepts.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Critical Thinking PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument. Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Critical Thinking PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Critical Thinking PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or alternatives.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Critical Thinking PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Response presents solutions that are practical and work in addressing the specific problem.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
|