unit 4 journal

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criterion 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 7.5

Level II Max Points

Points: 6

Level I Max Points

Points: 5

0 Points

Content

· Content is comprehensive and persuasive. Major points are stated and are well supported.

· The Kaltura/self-reflection addresses all components of the assignment and incorporates the required content in a succinct, well-delivered manner.

· Content is adequate. Major points are stated. Discussion is adequate and addresses the requirements.

· Content and purpose of the Kaltura/self-reflection are articulated.

· Content is not comprehensive or persuasive.

· Major points are addressed but not well supported.

· Responses are inadequate or content is inconsistent with regard to purpose or clarity of thought.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criterion 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 7.5

Level II Max Points

Points: 6

Level I Max Points

Points: 5

0 Points

Organization & Structure

· Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is very clear and easy to follow.

· Transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the journal.

· The conclusions are logical and flow from the rest of the writing.

· Structure is clear and easy to follow.

· Transitions are present.

· Conclusions are logical

· Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is not easy to follow. Transitions need improvement.

· Insights do not flow from the rest of the journal.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criterion 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

0 Points

Grammar; punctuation & spelling; or video quality

· Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed.

· Spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise.

· Sentences display strong, varied structure.

· Video is high quality, well presented, and understandable.

· Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed with only minor errors that do not detract from the readability of the work. Spelling is correct.

· Video has some areas of poor quality and/or is difficult to understand in two or more areas .

· Kaltura/self-reflection contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

· Video has major flaws and/or is difficult to understand in more than four areas.

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

20

16

12

0

Minimum Total Points

17 points minimum

13 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 15

Level II Max

Points: 12

Level I Max

Points: 9

Not Present

0 Points

Content of Paper

· Content includes: discussion regarding what was chosen for the differentials, the diagnosis and treatment. Includes the rationale for decisions. Discusses choices compared to the expert opinions. Describes what was learned and how this will help in practice.

· At least three pages in body length (not including title and reference page

· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner

· Develops content and theories are well

· Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience

· Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper

· Uses at least three scholarly resources (less than 5 years old) that were not provided in the course materials

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Missing one component of the required content

· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter

· Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role

· Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials

· Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.

· Uses two scholarly outside resources (less than 5 years old)

· Missing two components of required content

· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter

· Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development

· Presents content but is missing depth and or development

· Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials or outdated resources (more than 5 years old)

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 15

Level II Max

Points: 12

Level I Max

Points: 9

Not Present

0 Points

Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning

· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content

· Synthesizes information from scholarly resources

· Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources

· Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements

· Supports content with at least one viewpoint.

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Lacks clarification or new information

· Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight

· Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete

· Completes most instruction requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 20

Level II Max

Points: 16

Level I Max

Points: 12

Not Present

0 Points

Application of Knowledge

· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources

· Applies practice that is accurate and plausible

· Supports practice with additional scholarly resources

· Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained

· Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Lacks objective criteria

· Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content

· Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner

· Completes most instruction requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Organization

· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument

· Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas

· Utilizes subheadings for ease of transition.

· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement

· Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow

· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content

· Provides a purpose statement

· Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Is in APA format-including title page and reference page

· Meets the assignment length requirements

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Includes no more than three APA formatting errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Meets the length requirements

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

· Includes no more than four APA formatting errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Meets the length requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60

48

36

0

Minimum Total Points

49 points minimum

37 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criterion 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 15

Level II Max Points

Points: 10

Level I Max Points

Points: 5

0 Points

Content

· Content includes discussion of at least one of the resources listed in the SAMHSA site

· At least 250 words in length

· Content is comprehensive and persuasive. Major points are stated and are well supported.

· The journal addresses all components of the assignment and incorporates the required content in a succinct, well-delivered manner.

· Content is adequate. Major points are stated. Discussion is adequate and addresses the requirements.

· Less than 250 words

· Content and purpose of the journal are articulated.

· Content is not comprehensive or persuasive. Major points are addressed but not well supported.

· Less than 250 words

· Responses are inadequate or content is inconsistent with regard to purpose or clarity of thought.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criterion 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 15

Level II Max Points

Points: 10

Level I Max Points

Points: 5

0 Points

Organization & Structure

· Structure of the journal is very clear and easy to follow. Transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the journal.

· The conclusions are logical and flow from the rest of the writing.

· Structure is clear and easy to follow.

· Transitions are present. Conclusions are logical

· Structure of the journal is not easy to follow. Transitions need improvement.

· Insights do not flow from the rest of the journal.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criterion 3

Level III Max Points

· Points: 10

Level II Max Points

· Points: 7

Level I Max Points

· Points: 3

· 0 Points

Grammar; punctuation & spelling; or video quality

· Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Spelling is correct.

· Language is clear and precise. Sentences display strong, varied structure.

· Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed with only minor errors that do not detract from the readability of the work. Spelling is correct.

· Journal contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

40

27

13

0

Minimum Total Points

28 points minimum

14 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 15

Level II Max

Points: 12

Level I Max

Points: 9

Not Present

0 Points

Content of Paper

· Content includes: discussion regarding the commonality between gender dysmorphia and substance abuse in the adolescent population. Addresses the DSM 5 TR criteria for these disorders along with the prevalence of gender dysmorphia and substance abuse in the adolescent population. Discusses treatment options and how to remain culturally and ethically sensitive to these patients

· At least 3 pages body length (not including title and reference page)

· Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner

· Develops content and theories are well

· Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience

· Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper

· Uses at least three scholarly resources (less than 5 years old) that were not provided in the course materials

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Missing one component of the required content

· Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter

· Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role

· Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials

· Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.

· Uses two scholarly outside resources (less than 5 years old)

· Missing two components of required content

· Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter

· Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development

· Presents content but is missing depth and or development

· Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials or outdated resources (more than 5 years old)

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 15

Level II Max

Points: 12

Level I Max

Points: 9

Not Present

0 Points

Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning

· Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content

· Synthesizes information from scholarly resources

· Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources

· Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements

· Supports content with at least one viewpoint.

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Lacks clarification or new information

· Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight

· Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete

· Completes most instruction requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 20

Level II Max

Points: 16

Level I Max

Points: 12

Not Present

0 Points

Application of Knowledge

· Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources

· Applies practice that is accurate and plausible

· Supports practice with additional scholarly resources

· Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained

· Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice

· Completes all instruction requirements

· Lacks objective criteria

· Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content

· Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner

· Completes most instruction requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Organization

· Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument

· Includes an introduction and conclusion paragraph

· Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas

· Utilizes subheadings for ease of transition.

· Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement

· Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow

· Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content

· Provides a purpose statement

· Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Is in APA format-including title page and reference page

· Meets the assignment length requirements

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Includes no more than three APA formatting errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Meets the length requirements

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

· Includes no more than four APA formatting errors that do not interfere with the readability

· Meets the length requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60

48

36

0

Minimum Total Points

49 points minimum

37 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criterion 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 7.5

Level II Max Points

Points: 6

Level I Max Points

Points: 5

0 Points

Content

· Content is comprehensive and persuasive. Major points are stated and are well supported.

· The Kaltura/self-reflection addresses all components of the assignment and incorporates the required content in a succinct, well-delivered manner.

· Content is adequate. Major points are stated. Discussion is adequate and addresses the requirements.

· Content and purpose of the Kaltura/self-reflection are articulated.

· Content is not comprehensive or persuasive.

· Major points are addressed but not well supported.

· Responses are inadequate or content is inconsistent with regard to purpose or clarity of thought.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criterion 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 7.5

Level II Max Points

Points: 6

Level I Max Points

Points: 5

0 Points

Organization & Structure

· Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is very clear and easy to follow.

· Transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the journal.

· The conclusions are logical and flow from the rest of the writing.

· Structure is clear and easy to follow.

· Transitions are present.

· Conclusions are logical

· Structure of the Kaltura/self-reflection is not easy to follow. Transitions need improvement.

· Insights do not flow from the rest of the journal.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criterion 3

Level III Max Points

●     Points: 5

Level II Max Points

●     Points: 4

Level I Max Points

●     Points: 3

0 Points

Grammar; punctuation & spelling; or video quality

· Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed.

· Spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise.

· Sentences display strong, varied structure.

· Video is high quality, well presented, and understandable.

· Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed with only minor errors that do not detract from the readability of the work. Spelling is correct.

· Video has some areas of poor quality and/or is difficult to understand in two or more areas .

· Kaltura/self-reflection contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

· Video has major flaws and/or is difficult to understand in more than four areas.

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

20

16

12

0

Minimum Total Points

17 points minimum

13 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment Criteria

Level III Max

Level II Max

Level I Max

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III

Points: 40

Level II

Points: 28

Level I

Points: 16

Not Present

0 Points

Total Score

· Obtains a total score between 81% to 100% on the virtual reality patient scenario

· Obtains a total score between 61% to 80% on the virtual reality patient scenario

· Obtains a total score between 41% to 60% on the virtual reality patient scenario

· Does not attempt patient scenario

· Obtains a total score of 40% or below

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60

48

36

0 points

Minimum Total Points

47 points minimum

37 points minimum

1 point minimum

0 points