| Unit 5: Theoretical Frameworks |
| Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| 0 -1.9 | 2 - 2.9 | 3 - 3.9 | 4 |
| Introduction | • Opening slide with name of presentation and presenter. | Opening slide with name of presentation and presenter, identification of the problem | Opening slide with name of presentation and presenter and title of presentation | opening slide with name of presentation of presenter, title of presentation and identification of a clinical problem; why the practice problem is significant to nursing and patient care | 10% | 0.00 |
| Theory | no theory presented | • Theoretical framework incorrectly and/or does not support topic; vague presentation; not clearly presented | • Summarize appropriate theoretical framework to support topic; some details omitted
|
Completely and thoroughly presents appropriate theory and how it supports chosen clinical topic | 15% | 0.00 |
| History/Theorist | No theorist or history presented | Vaguely or incompletely identifies the theorist and/or vaguely or briefly addresses history of the theory
• Identify appropriate sampling methodology to address research problem | Chooses correct theorist and addresses how theory was developed; details may be omitted
| Chooses correct theorist and completely presents how theory was developed | 4 | 15% | 0.60 |
| Application to Practice Setting/research | no example of how theory has been used in resesarch | Vague, brief, or incomplete example of how theory used in nursing research | Gives appropriate example of use of theory in research; details omitted | Identifies and presents an appropriate example of how theory used in nursing research as a framework with supporting rationale | 15% | 0.00 |
| Summary | No summary included | • Identifies 4 summary points | summary included identifies 4 summary points; includes 3-4 scholarly references | • Identifies 4 summary points
• Provide a full reference list with at least 5 scholarly sources | 10% | 0.00 |
| Reflection | Does not provide reflection | provides vague and brief summary; does not summarize the points in the presentation | provides thoughtful summation of the presentation; details may be omitted | • Provides a thoughtful and complete conclusion of the salient points in the presentation | 10% | 0.00 |
| Presentation Style | • Slides contain an appropriate amount of content | • Full speaker’s notes for EACH slide; including citations.
• Slides contain an appropriate amount of content | • Full speaker’s notes for EACH slide; including citations.
• Slides contain an appropriate amount of content
• Uses creative graphics, smart art, pictures and other engaging material to capture attention of audience and not repeat the presentation narrative in speaker’s notes | • Full speaker’s notes for EACH slide; including citations.
• Slides contain an appropriate amount of content
• Contains 6-8 slides
• Uses creative graphics, smart art, pictures and other engaging material to capture attention of audience and not repeat the presentation narrative in speaker’s notes.
• Overall presentation is integrated and organized. | 15% | 0.00 |
| Format/Style | Did not follow APA format; no references included | Major errors with APA formatting; 1-2 references included for presentation | Correct APA with reference slide; 2-3 references included ; Minor APA and/or grammar errors | Presentaion forllows APA guidelines. Reference slide with 3-5 scholarly references.No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. | 10% | 0.00 |
| 100% | 0.60 |
| Final Score | 16.5 |
| Percentage | 15.00% |
| Total available points = | 110 | 4 |
| Rubric Score | Grade points | Percentage |
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High |
| 3.5 | 4.0 | 99 | 110 | 90% | 100% |
| 2.5 | 3.49 | 88 | 99 | 80% | 89.99% |
| 1.7 | 2.49 | 77 | 88 | 70% | 79.99% |
| 1.0 | 1.69 | 66 | 77 | 60% | 69.99% |
| 0.0 | 1.00 | 0 | 66 | 0 | 59.99% |