Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent 90%–100% | Good 80%–89% | Fair 70%–79% | Poor 0%–69% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
In 2–3 pages, address the following:
• Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder. | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
| • Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
| • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
| • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback: |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: |
|
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback: |
In 2–3 pages, address the following:
• Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder.
-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:• Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback:• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Good 80%–89% 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Fair 70%–79% 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback:| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric