IT Infrastructure and Security

spunja88
NewDOCXDocument.docx

Length: ~10 slides, with voiceover,

Presentation duration: 10 ~ 15 mins

Feedback mode: Marks and comments from canvas

Assignment Mode: Individual

 

Main Specification Document and submission template:

See the files below for detailed instructions for this assignment.  The version with voiceover, has me discussing the assignment in detail.  Load it into Powerpoint, press F5 to view / run it.  The version without voiceover can be used as a template for you.

· Without voiceover (71KB)     1-ITIS-2010-Asg-1.pptx

Actions

   

· With voiceover (35MB)       1M-ITIS-2010-Asg-1.pptx

Actions

The 'hack' refers to the CVE ("Common Vulnerabilities and Exploits") database. 

You will find more details about this standard way of referring to newly discovered hacks in   https://cve.mitre.org/ (Links to an external site.) .

 

 

 

 

 

Academic integrity

The rule is simple.  If you pretend the work of others to be your own work, whether that be those of other students or cut/paste from websites or whatever.  If you pretend it to be yours, and it is not, there is an automated procedure which will involve your student record.  Don't do it.

 

More details:   https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student-essentials/rights-and-responsibilities/academic-integrity (Links to an external site.)

Learning Objectives Assessed:

This assignment assesses Learning Objectives:

· CLO1: Describe all of the IT Infrastructure Architecture components and the issues relating to each of them

· CLO2: Demonstrate knowledge of higher level aspects of data communications and network technology appropriate for the development of software applications in a networked environment;

· CLO4: Analyse and determine an appropriate secure web server configuration based on stated user needs;

· CLO5: Explain the functioning of security services in computing environments and the security issues in mobile and IoT computing,

· CLO6: Describe and review emerging networking technologies

Graduate Outcomes supported: 

1. Enabling Knowledge

2. Critical Analysis

3. Communication

 

Assessment declaration

declare that in submitting all work for this assessment I have read, understood and agree to the content and expectations of the   Assessment declaration  (Links to an external site.) . .

 

Rubric

ITIS 2010 Asg 1 Presentation

ITIS 2010 Asg 1 Presentation

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeA. ZIP Submission

A.1 PPTX with voiceover (optionally with MP4) -- OR -- PPTX without voiceover + MP4

20.0 Pts

Files supplied as per spec

10.0 Pts

2 files expected

Only one of PPTX w/o V/O or MP4 supplied,

0.0 Pts

No PPTX or MP4 files supplied

?????

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeA.2 SRT

SRT file supplied

10.0 Pts

Supplied

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeA.3 PDF

PDF of all 3 papers supplied

10.0 Pts

Supplied

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeB. Overall Slides

B.1 Title / overview / summary slides all present?

10.0 Pts

Supplied and Acceptable

Contains: Title; Overview; Summary; with names of all 3 papers and the hack.

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeB.2 Overall Discussion

Overall discussion highlights the common thread among papers presented

30.0 Pts

Both verbally and in slides and attempt to engage audience

20.0 Pts

Both verbally and in slides

10.0 Pts

Either verbally or in slides

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeB.3 Citation

All papers + Hack + any other external material cited properly

20.0 Pts

All citations supplied and correct

10.0 Pts

Many citations supplied and correct, but some are not correct, or are missing.

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeC. Papers

C.1 Paper 1 details properly summarised highlighting any parts that are directly relevant to the discussion thread. Can be 'çlassic' or recent paper.

30.0 Pts

Excellent, very engaging and clear how it related to the overall theme

20.0 Pts

Supplied but no real attempt to engage audience

10.0 Pts

Supplied, but incomplete or inadequate

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeC.2 Paper 2 details

Reduce by 5 marks if not recent (<10 years old)

30.0 Pts

Excellent, very engaging and clear how it related to the overall theme

20.0 Pts

Supplied but no real attempt to engage audience

10.0 Pts

Supplied, but incomplete or inadequate

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeC.3 Paper 3 details

Reduce by 5 marks if not recent (<10 years old)

30.0 Pts

Excellent, very engaging and clear how it related to the overall theme

20.0 Pts

Supplied but no real attempt to engage audience

10.0 Pts

Supplied, but incomplete or inadequate

0.0 Pts

Not supplied

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeD. Hack

D.1 Hack Identification. Hack properly identified / referenced (CVE)

20.0 Pts

Adequately named, numbered, and with URL and correct citation.

10.0 Pts

Supplied, but not adequately named, numbered, and with URL and correct citation.

0.0 Pts

Not Supplied

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeD.2 Hack Description

Hack properly described and relevance to slide theme is clearly indicated

20.0 Pts

Relevance to theme discussion is made clear

10.0 Pts

Description seems to be regurgitated from CVE doco with no integration to theme

0.0 Pts

Not Supplied

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeD.3 Background Explanation

Background explanation to further explain hack significance and relevance

20.0 Pts

Explanation is good. Significance and relevance to theme is made clear

10.0 Pts

Explanation is not adequate

0.0 Pts

Not Supplied

20.0 pts

Total points: 250.0