proposal
Analysis of Saudi Arabia Trade Logistics performance: 2007-2016
Munaya A. Asiri
A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the College of Graduate Studies at Virginia State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Economics in the College of Engineering, Science and Technology
Virginia
2018
______________________________ Date: __________________________
Mulugeta S. Kahsai, Ph.D., Thesis Advisor
______________________________ Date: __________________________
Ceslav Ciobanu, Ph.D., Committee Member
______________________________ Date: __________________________
Maxwell Eseonu, Ph.D., Committee Member
Abstract
Munaya Asiri
Analysis of Saudi Arabia Trade Logistics Performance: 2007-2016
Under the direction of (Mulugeta S. Kahsai, Paulos C. Tsegaw, Ceslav Ciobanu, Maxwell Eseonu)
This research explores the drivers of and barriers to, logistics performance in Saudi Arabia. It also explores what it will take for Saudi Arabia to reach its LPI target stated in Vision 2030. The analysis shows Saudi Arabia ‘performance during the 2007-2016 period and compares it against the regional leader, and Taiwan which is ranked 25. The study found out that Saudi Arabia hasn’t made any major progress in some of the LPI dimensions from 2007 to 2016. Its major weaknesses are customs, logistics competence and some sectors in the infrastructure dimension and the Saudi Arabia government needs to pay more attention to these weaknesses in order to achieve its stated logistics performance goals.
Acknowledgements
First of all, thanks to God for giving me this special opportunity and helping me towards achieving my goal. Getting knowledge and high education has always been my dream.
I am highly indebted to my family for their encouragement and support which helped me a lot through this period. I will not forget my friends who were always with me; thank you for everything.
I would like to express my special gratitude and thanks to my advisor, Dr. Mulugeta S. Kahsai, for his patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my MA study.
Finally, major thanks are due to my government (SACM) for giving me this opportunity.
I am very proud of myself and the challenges that I have overcome. A tip of the hat to everyone who told me you can do it no matter what.
Table of Contents
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
1.1. Overview of world Trade 3
1.2. Overview of Saudi Arabia Trade 4
1.3. Logistics in Saudi Arabia 7
1.4. Objectives of the Study 11
Chapter 2: Literature review 11
2.1. Logistics and Trade 11
2.2. Importance of Logistics Performance 11
Chapter 3: Mythology 18
3.1. Variable Descriptions 18
3.2. Data Source 19
3.2.1. World Bank 19
3.2.2. International Trade Center 20
3.3. Methods of Analysis 20
Chapter 4: Analysis 21
4.1. Saudi Arabia Logistics Performance Overtime 21
4.2. Saudi Arabia compared to its region 29
4.3 Saudi Arabia Compared to Taiwan (ranked 25 in 2016) 33
Chapter 5: Conclusion 41
References 44
Appendix 46
12
3
List of Tables
Table 1. World Export & Import 3
Table 2. Saudi Arabia Export & Import 5
Table 3. Saudi Arabia during the years 2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016 25
Table 4. LPI of Saudi Arabia & High income group & Region Middle East 29
Table 5. Domestic Logistics Comparison between UEA and KSA 31
Table 6. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Logistics Performance Index 33
Table 7. Saudi Arabia ‘customs compared to Taiwan ‘customs 34
Table 8. Saudi Arabia ‘infrastructure compared to Taiwan ‘infrastructure 35
Table 9. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan international shipment 36
Table 10. KSA ‘logistics competence compared to Taiwan ‘logistics competence 37
Table 11. The Difference in Tracking and Tracing between KSA and Taiwan 38
Table 12. The Differences in Timeliness between Taiwan and Saudi Arabia 39
Table 13. Taiwan compared to Saudi Arabia in 2016 40
Figure 1. World Trade 3
Figure 2. Saudi Arabia at a glance 5
Figure 3. Saudi Arabia Import and Export: 2007-2016 6
Figure 4. Early wins in customs process streamlining 8
Figure 5. Nine-point Strategy for Transforming its Logistics Sector 11
Figure 6. Six Dimension of LPI 12
Figure 7. The Process of Logistic Trade 16
Figure 8. six Logistic Performance Index 18
Figure 9. Saudi Arabia Overall 21
Figure 10. Saudi Arabia across years 22
Figure 11. Dimensions of logistic performance index 23
Figure 12. KSA 2016 baseline position and 2020 target in the LPI 25
Figure 13. KSA advantages to becoming a logistics hub 28
Figure 14. Saudi Arabia Compared to Middle East and North Africa Region 29
Figure 15. Saudi Arabia against top performer in region (United Arab Emirates) 30
Figure 16. LPI Comparison Taiwan versus Saudi Arabia-2016 33
Figure 17. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Customs 34
Figure 18. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Infrastructure 35
Figure 19. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan international shipment 36
Figure 20. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Logistics competence 37
Figure 21. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Tracking and Tracing 38
Figure 22. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Timeliness 39
1. Introduction
Logistics system has been increasingly recognized as one of the important driving forces for economic growth (Zhofang Chu,2012). Also, it plays an important part in a country’s economy, where rapidly developing economy supports the logistics development. For this reason, countries have given considerable attention to the development of logistics. With this linkage, logistics is expected to grow in line with the economic development. Logistics has become an enormously important component of the gross domestic product (GDP) of industrialized nations and thus affects the rate of inflation, interest rates, productivity, energy costs and its availability and other aspects of the economy as well (Hertz & Alfredsson, 2003). Ever changing business environment due to globalization, lead time reductions, customer orientation, and outsourcing has contributed to the interest in logistics (Hertz & Alfredsson, 2003). The increase in global production sharing, the shortening of product life cycles, and the increase of global competition all underline logistics as a strategic source of competitive advantage (Arvis, Mustra, Panzer, Ojala, & Naula, 2007).
Moreover, in order to remain in competitive marketplace and earn reasonable profits, organizations interest in logistics has been increased. Logistics operations have become more efficient due to technological advancements which make it possible to deliver goods on time while reducing the cost involved. Consequently, the efficiency and reliability of the logistics system affects economic productivity which is the most important determinant of economic performance.) Council of Supply Chine Management professional).
Therefore, logistics industry is the artery and the basic industry of the national economic development in the world. Its development level is one of the important marks to evaluate the level of state modernization and comprehensive strength. Logistics is the accelerator of the economic development and growth.
International logistics costs are estimated to represent about 15% of the volume of international trade and, as a result, it can be seen that international logistics plays a key role in the world's economy (Hang Zhou,2017). But there is one particular characteristic that distinguishes international logistics from domestic logistics and its impact on the world's economy. One particular characteristic is crossing of borders between two or more countries besides the complexity consisting of a mix of cultural, political, technological and economic issues. Cross border movement rings in issues related to dumping of goods and Forex exchanges. It can destroy the internal domestic economy. Thus, Government further requires a set of rules and regulation to control it. Also, It is a big issue for the government as countries differ in technological development and political scenario. It decided the quantum of flow of international trade as well as the direction of trade. Cultural and economic perspective decides the purchasing power and taste and preference of individuals in economy. It affects the trade significantly.
Countries logistics performance is strongly associated with the reliability of supply chains and the predictability of service delivery for producers and exporters. Supply chains—only as strong as their weakest links—are becoming more and more complex, often spanning many countries while remaining critical to national competitiveness (World Bank).
1.1 Overview World Trade
According to International Trade Center (ITC), total world trade grew 14.65% from 2007 to 2016. In 2007 total word trade was around $27,874,717,470 compared $31,958,841,715 in 2016. In 2007, total import was around $14,097,221,790 while in 2016 was about $16,045,698,257. Import increased by 13.8% during 2007 - 2016. On the other hand, export grew by 15.5% during the same period (Table 1).
|
Year |
Import(US$) |
Export(US$) |
Total (US$) |
|
2007 |
14,097,221,790 |
13,777,495,680 |
27874717470 |
|
2016 |
16,045,698,257 |
15,913,143,458 |
31958841715 |
Table 1. World Export & Import
(Source: International Trade Center)
Figure 1. World Trade
(Source: international trade center)
The graph above compares the compares global imports and exports of 2007 and 2016. Overall, it can be seen that over the period, both imports and exports increased but the percentage increase in exports is slightly higher than imports (15.5% to 13.8% respectively).
Total world trade balance:
In 2007, world trade balance (difference between imports and exports) was $-319,726,110 but it went down to $-132,554,799 in 2016 (ITC). The major trading countries were China, Germany, Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia. China is number one in terms of total trade and its ‘trade balance was 1,587,920,688 during the period (ITC).
1.2 Overview of Saudi Arabia Trade:
Saudi Arabia is the largest economy in the Middle East and the richest Arab country. The policy of large-scale public works undertaken by the Government, as well as foreign direct investment and the soundness of the banking and financial system, have enabled the country to become the number one regional economy and one of the largest in the world. However, the economy of Saudi Arabia is almost entirely based on oil. GDP growth has been gradually declining since 2015 to a point where the economy moved into a recession in 2017 (-0.5%)
Saudi Arabia has been ranked as the 20th most economically competitive country in the world. It is the world’s largest producer and exporter of petroleum products, and also, the largest oil producer. Saudi Arabia’s trade remains heavily dependent on the oil and petroleum-related industries, including petrochemicals and petroleum refining.
Figure 2. Saudi Arabia at a glance
(Source: Saudi Arabia transportation and logistics opportunities)
|
Year |
RSA/million |
RSA/million |
|
|
EXPORT |
IMPORT |
|
2007 |
874403 |
338,088 |
|
2008 |
1175482 |
431,753 |
|
2009 |
721109 |
358,290 |
|
2010 |
941785 |
400,736 |
|
2011 |
1367620 |
493,449 |
|
2012 |
1456502 |
583,473 |
|
2013 |
1409523 |
630,582 |
|
2014 |
1284122 |
651,876 |
|
2015 |
763313 |
655,033 |
|
2016 |
688423 |
525,636 |
Table 2. Saudi Arabia ‘Export & Import
(Source: Saudi statistics)
Figure 3. Saudi Arabia Import and Export: 2007-2016
(Source: International Trade Center )
Saudi Arabia has made a remarkable progressive in both sectors export and import. As can be seen from the graph above, there were different trends for export and import. Imports increased steadily between 2007 and 2014 and started to decline in 2015. Imports reached their highest level in 2015 to $655,033 million and its lowest level in 2016. Exports on the other hand followed a fluctuating trend and reached its highest level in 2012 to $1,456,502 million and its lowest level in 2016. The growth rate of the import sector during the years is 55.47% while the rate of the export sector is -21.26%.
Supporting all these trade activities is logistics and supply chain operations. Logistics performance is strongly associated with the reliability of supply chains and the predictability of service availability.
1.3 Logistic in Saudi Arabia:
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is located strategically between three continents Asia, Africa and Europe. The transport and logistics sector in Saudi Arabia is supporting a population of 32,28 million (2016) and plays a crucial role as enabler and prerequisite for growth in the country as well as for the “economic cities” (EC’s). As a result of the economic growth and development, annual cargo volumes will triple from 300 million tons in 2005 to around 900 million tons in 2020.The two most important ports for imports are Jeddah Islamic Port and King Abdul Aziz Port Dammam. Jubail Industrial Port is the biggest port for export, Yanbu Industrial Port follows as the second biggest port for exports. This implies that hinter- land connections are as important as maritime transport and ports. The existing infrastructure, however, has not yet kept pace with the industrial development of Saudi Arabia and is still inadequate with limited inland road, rail and sea connectivity. For this reason, numerous projects for the development of ports, roads and railway transportation have been planned. With the right incentives and also by leveraging the country’s strategic location to attract traffic to its seaports, airports, logistics network; Saudi Arabian Government aims to strategically privatize operation and management of components of the transport and logistics sector ) Andreas Hergenröther 2013)
Saud Arabia’s nine-point logistics transformation strategy
Recognizing the growth potential that its logistics sector can have on non-oil trade and investment — a key objective of its Vision 2030 — the Kingdom puts a nine-point logistics transformation strategy. The strategy will be a significant enabler for the country’s logistics success.
a. Enhance and reengineer the import/export process
Becoming an international logistics hub begins with reducing the time, cost and variability of importing and exporting goods. KSA already has some nice wins in this area thanks to automation and progress efforts to reengineer the import/export methods. For example, average declaration clearance times at seaports have been cut in half to just 2.2 days and at airports to just 1.2 days, and the amount of import-export paperwork is down by 75 percent (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Early wins in customs process streamlining
(Source: Supply Chine Brain)
Clearing customs is not just faster, but also more predictable and reliable, with 40 percent of customs declarations at seaports now cleared within 24 hours and 70 percent cleared within 48 hours. Many of the improvements are attributed to modernizing the declarations process and managing risk. “Declarations can now be submitted digitally and prior to arrival at ports, and customs is now open 24/7,” explains a customs executive
b. Digital transformation
Digital technology has significantly improved KSA’s security, transparency and control over the import-export process. Today, importers track the status and progress of their shipments in real time. Customs brokers receive automated status notifications on their mobiles, and are prompted to create their declarations as soon as the shipping manifest is available online, i.e., prior to ship arrival. KSA recently launched two new digital initiatives: a port community system to guarantee secure and efficient exchange of information, and a digital payment platform to accelerate the payment process.
c. Develop a transport infrastructure
The Kingdom aims to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of the country’s transport infrastructure. The plan calls for development of several major assets, including the Saudi Land bridge railway to connect the east and west coasts of Saudi, and two new rail corridors, Ras-Al Khair-Dammam in the east and Yanbu-Jazan in the west. Next on the agenda could be construction of new multimodal logistics terminals to fill the increasing need for sea-to-air and rail-to-road connectivity.
d. Eliminate air cargo bottlenecks
Saudi Arabia works to improve airports and expand air cargo facilities to eliminate infrastructure bottlenecks. According to vision 2030, the objective is to increase total air cargo capacity in the Kingdom from 0.8 million tons/year today to 6.8 million tons/year by 2030.
e. Meet international regulatory standards
Saudi Arabia wants to attract more competition and private-sector participants, then its regulatory environment must be in line with international standards. It will help logistics players to move the logistics performance in the area. Government works to give licenses to warehouse operators and makes remarkable effort to improve efficiency and safety standards.
f. Improve seaport quality and efficiency
Efforts are under way to identify and repair the inefficiencies of sea ports. The initial focus is on growing port specialization, reforming governance and oversight, and updating concession frameworks. Also, Saudi Arabia wants to create a more level playing field by separating port regulations from port ownership and assigning a dedicated regulating entity. Concession frameworks are revised to become more transparent, fair and attractive to international terminal operators.
g. Reform the rail sector
The rail sector is going through similar reforms. Recently, railway regulation was separated from railway ownership and assigned to an independent regulator and it called (the Public Transport Authority). The government is consolidating and restructuring all railway operations, and planning to award operations and maintenance contracts for passenger and freight services to reputable international operators.
h. Engage the private sector
The Kingdom takes a great step to engage private sectors in the markets. Recently, awarded a 20-year contract to Singapore's Changi Airport Group to handle operations at the new King Abdul-Aziz International Airport (KAIA) in Jeddah. Similarly, SATS, Singapore’s biggest ground handler, has agreed to develop and operate a new cargo terminal at King Fahd International Airport (KFIA) in Dammam (supply chain brain). Similar schemes to increase private sector participation are being considered for the King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh.
i. Develop special economic zones
The kingdom works to reduce the costs and barriers to setting up new businesses, signing trade agreements, and attracting foreign direct investment. There are many plans under way to develop several new special economic areas.
Figure 5. Nine-point Strategy for Transforming its Logistics Sector
(Source: Transport Ministry of Saudi Arabia)
1.3 Objectives of the Study
In 2016, Saudi Arabia launched its Vision 2030 to guide its economic and social development of the country. One of the key components of Vision 2030 is improvements in trade and logistics performance. According to the vision, the share of non-oil exports are expected to increase from 16% to 50% and the global ranking in the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) from 52 to 25. Saudi Arabia also aims to be the regional logistics leader.
This research aims to assess the trade logistic performance of Saudi Arabia and its place in the region. It will explore the strength and weakness of the different dimensions of its logistics performance. It will try to answer the following research questions
1. Does Saudi Arabia logistics performance improved overtime?
2. Is Saudi Arabia efficient in terms of its logistics performance compared to the region? If so in what dimension? If no, what are its weaknesses
3. Is Saudi Arabia efficient in terms of its logistics performance compared to its income group? If so in what dimension? If no, what are its weaknesses
4. Can Saudi Arabia achieve its vision 2030 logistic performance goal? What will it take to achieve that?
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1 Logistics and Trade
Logistics is the one important function in business today. No marketing, manufacturing or project execution can succeed without logistics support. Logistics is the process of planning, implementing, and controlling procedures for the efficient and effective transportation and storage of goods, including services and related information, from the point of origin to the point of consumption. The goal of the logistics is to successfully meet customer satisfaction. This definition includes inbound, outbound, internal and external movements (Margaret Rouse, 2014). Logistics is defined by Bowersox as: “… a term which denotes a total approach to the management of the distribution process including all of those activities involved in physically moving raw materials, in process inventory and finished goods inventory from point of origin to point of use or consumption”. In other words, logistics combines the traditionally defined areas of materials management and physical distribution. Every business establishment is aimed at providing quality, timely and effective products or services to their customers as a means of retaining them and opening more customer doors. Logistics is very important in business for it actually leads to the ultimate consummation of the sales contract. Logistical support enables the actual movement, delivery and transportation of goods or services from a seller to a buyer.
2.2 Importance of logistics performance
The World Bank’s logistics performance index uses as starting point for the assessment of logistics performance. All these indicators are measured on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high). All the data used in the study are for the period of 2007-2016.
Figure 6. Six Dimension of LPI
(Source: Drivers of Logistics Performance” Case Study of Turkey)
The figure shows the six LPI dimensions to two main categories. The first category relates to main inputs to the supply chain (customs, infrastructure, and quality of logistics services). The second category involves service delivery performance outcomes, namely timeliness, ease of arranging international shipments, and tracking and tracing. Logistics systems usually involve complex combinations of sequential activities. Poor performance in one dimension might be related to inconsistency among policy actions targeting other dimensions. For example, government restrictions on logistics services may enhance logistics quality but might increase shipment costs. Therefore, a policy program encompassing overall logistics performance improvement has a greater chance of yielding effective and sustainable results than partial reforms.
The World Bank provides source “international logistics” for supply chain and countries and it is a tool to help them to identify the challenges and opportunities they face in their performance on trade logistics and what they can do to improve their performance. The components analyzed in the international LPI were chosen by the World Bank based on recent theoretical and empirical research and on the practical experience of logistics professionals involved in international freight forwarding.
Also, World Bank have section that called “domestics logistics” Domestic logistics is the distribution of goods within a country. Managing logistics domestically is very different from managing logistics internationally because of the much narrower geographic scope in a domestic operation. Domestics use four major determinants of overall logistics performance to measure performance and they are Infrastructure, Services, Border procedures and time, and Supply chain reliability.
Domestic logistics can utilize a variety of transportation options for moving goods, out of which road transport is the most common preference. Domestically, road transport in itself also provides a variety of options while international logistics have limited transportation options and some would require only rail while others would require only flight or sea transport. International logistics may also involve using multiple transportation alternatives for a single transaction. International logistics, there are some additional costs to be considered too which include tariffs, government taxes, fees and currency exchange fluctuations while the domestics logistics, the costs involved with just store facilities, transportation, workers and technology. In order to build relationships between businesses or between a business and the customers, trust is the most important factor, which decides on the nature of the relationship. It gets easier to build trustworthy relationships domestically but, in international cases, different country regulations, geography and economic roadblocks present more challenges in building reliable relationship.
The levels of importance of logistics performance are measured by the five-point, in which 1 means very unimportant and 5 means very importance. As for the level of satisfaction of logistics policy, 1 refers to very low and 5 refers to very high.
Faria et al., (2015) have founded that the greatest obstacles are bureaucratic issues such as customs clearance time with physical inspection, high number of agencies to import and export and high number of documents required to allow the import and export. The quality and efficiency of logistics services can matter for international trade as a weak logistics infrastructure and operational processes can be a major obstacle to global trade integration (Devline & Yee, 2005). In countries with poor governance and where institutions governing trade transactions and procedures are weak, traders can face significant difficulties in dealing with public sector employees such as customs officials (Azmat G., 2017)
One of the major obstacles is additional costs such as time delays in shipping that can take several forms but ultimately they increase the cost to firms that are then passed on to consumers (Jane K., Patricia S., 2009).
There are gaps in logistics performance between the high-income group countries and the low and middle-income group of countries (Arviset et al., 2012). With regard to the “logistics gap” between the high-income countries argued that the transport and logistics in the developing countries, including the supporting for integration into other global value chain “GVCs”, still face very significant obstacle (Azmat G., 2017)
Several studies have suggested that investments in infrastructure may be associated with export growth and business development (Wilson et al., 2004; Soloaga et al., 2006; Mirza, 2008, Limão & Venables, 2001; Portugal-Perez & Wilson, 2010). One key issue in the literature is the condition of infrastructure. The difference in the condition of infrastructure (communication and transportation) among countries affects export performance more than the traditional trade barriers in developing countries (Francois & Manchin 2007).
Langley and Holcomb (1992) stated that integrated global logistics service is crucial for creating customer value. Richardson (1998) also suggested that the key factor for the development of international companies relies on their logistics and supply chain management ability. If an enterprise can make effective logistics plan and management, it will be able to obtain optimal integration of overall production processes and the global market demand, which would deal with the problems of production output and capital (Christopher, 1998).
Empirical studies show that foreign investment is attracted to areas where transportation systems are more efficient and dynamic (Saidi & Hammami, 2011). Existing studies on logistics and trade generally tend to show consistent outcomes and point to a general direction that there is a positive correlation between improved logistics and more trade. For example, Arvis et al. (2007 and 2010) presented descriptive statistics suggesting a positive association between logistics performance and important outcome indicators such as trade openness. Other studies have shown that inefficiencies within the transportation infrastructure can have adverse effects on trade. For example, Dettmer et al., (2014) in their study on air cargo in South Africa concluded that a more liberal market for air cargo services could reduce transport costs and promote further integration.
Transport and logistics service (air and maritime connectivity and logistics performance) includes the whole range of transportation infrastructure (high speed roads, terminal facilities, storage warehouses, and runaway length) and services from seaports, land based transportation systems as well as air transport. Transport is the most expensive component of trade logistics and an adequate infrastructure is required to facilitate transportation (OECD, 2011a). High prices, poor service, and a lack of certainty in transport and logistics cannot engage any country in the world markets (Azmat G., 2017).
Figure 7. the Process of Logistic Trade
(Source: Ballou, 2004)
Infrastructure, though still a constraint in developing countries, seems to be improving. Satisfaction with infrastructure quality varies by infrastructure type (world bank 2014) Satisfaction with rail infrastructure is again low in all regions (World Bank).
Chapter 3: Methodology
3 Methodology
3.1 Variable Description
The study will Logistics Performance Index developed by the World Bank. The LPI index has six dimensions divided in two categories: Areas of policy regulations which are inputs and Service delivery performance which are the outcomes of the inputs. Areas for policy regulation are the main inputs to the supply chain and include customs, infrastructure, and quality of logistics services. Service delivery performance show the outcomes and include timeliness, international shipments, and tracking and tracing.
Figure 8. six Logistic Performance Index
(Source: connecting to compete 2016 report)
Figure 8 shows:
Customs measures the efficiency of customs and border clearance
Infrastructure measures the quality of trade and transport infrastructure
Logistics competence: It measures the overall competence of the logistics services –
trucking forwarding, and customs brokerage provided by parties within the logistics system.
Achieving logistics excellence requires continuous improvement in reliability, responsiveness and well-functioning support services.
Timeliness measures the frequency with which shipments reach consignees within scheduled or expected delivery times
Tracking and tracing measures the ability to track and trace consignments
International shipment: This dimension gives an estimate of the country’s performance in arranging shipments at competitive prices.
Even though the overall LPI and its six dimensions provides some preliminary information on the drivers of overall logistics performance, domestic logistics performance is needed to unbundle countries performance further. It provides a more detailed information on countries’ logistics environments, core logistics processes and institutions, and performance time and cost. This approach looks at the logistics constraints within countries, not just at the gateways, such as ports or borders. It analyzes country performance in four major determinants of overall logistics performance: infrastructure, services, border procedures and time, and supply chain reliability.
3.2 Sources of Data
3.2.1World Bank:
The source of the logistics data is the World Development Indicators (The World Bank, 2017). The study is using the Overall Logistics Performance Index (LP-O) and its six dimensions. They are measured on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high). The overall measure is the weighted average of the country scores covering the six sub-dimensions of logistics performance. These sub-dimensions include: ability to track and trace consignments; competence and quality of logistics services; ease of arranging competitively priced shipments; efficiency of customs clearance process; frequency with which shipments reach consignee within scheduled or expected time; and quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure. All these indicators are measured on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high). All the data used in the study are for the period of 2007-2016.
3.2.2 International Trade Center:
The source of monthly, quarterly and yearly trade data. Import & export values, volumes, growth rates, market shares. ITC is a key challenge for exporters is the scarcity of reliable trade information on markets.
3.3 .Method of analysis
Descriptive analysis will be used to see and compare
· Saudi Arabia logistics performance overtime
· Saudi Arabia against top performer in the region (United Arab Emirates).
· Compare Saudi Arabia with Taiwan which in 2016 is ranked 25.
Chapter 4: Analysis
4 Analysis
4.1 Saudi Arabia Logistics Performance Overtime
In 2016, Saudi Arabia by scoring 3.22 (out of a maximum of 5) in the Logistics Performance Index scale of the World Bank and was ranked 52 out of 160 countries. If we breakdown its logistics performance of 2016 into the six dimensions (Graph 5) we see that the weakest points are the efficiency in the clearance process and uncompetitive shipment prices.
Figure 9. Saudi Arabia Overall
(Source: World bank)
Saudi Arabia across years
Figure10. Saudi Arabia across years
(Source: World Bank)
The Figure 10 above shows Saudi Arabia LPI overall score for the period of 2007 to 2016. It can be clearly seen that the highest rate was in 2010 around 3.23 and went down to 3.15 in 2014. By 2016 it has increased to 3.17. In conclusion, we can see that the rate of logistic performances has made high significant progress from 2007 to 2010 but in recent years it is fluctuating between 3.15 - 3.20.
Figure 11. Dimensions of logistic performance index
(Source: World Bank)
Figure 11 shows the trend in the six dimensions of logistic performance index such as customs, shipments, tracking & tracing, infrastructure, logistics competence and timeliness from 2007 to 2016. As can be seen from the graph, there were different trends for each indicator.
Customs: Efficiency of customs clearance process in Saudi Arabia was reported as 2.6914 in 2016, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. In 2007, start to grow and reach the highest point 2.91 while in 2010 the performance has been decreased. Customs is the weakest dimension compared to others dimensions.
Infrastructure: Global production networks depend on transport operations. Trade and transport facilitation are at the core of stimulating economic development. (Haughwout, 2001)Transport infrastructure has a significant impact on the productivity and the cost structure of private firms (Haughwout, 2001). Saudi Arabia has allocated $43.8 billion for transport, telecommunications, water, agriculture and other related infrastructure. Additionally, it has several railway projects in the pipeline. The country's construction sector contributes around 8 per cent of Saudi Arabia’s total GDP, making it the largest construction market in the Middle East. Around 67 per cent of construction investment is direct from the government with large-scale projects in the sector for the coming years set to reach $800 billion (Nicole Dsouze). During the 2007 and 2014 there was a sharp increase in the infrastructure from 2.90 to 3.35 and then the percentage gradually went down to 3.23 in 2016.
Timeliness: The timeliness of shipments in reaching destination measures the reliability of shipment delivery times. In 2010, it was around 3.77 then it has decreased to reach 3.53 by 2016.
Tracking and tracing: Traceability is a product of the logistics sector as a whole. Tracking and Tracing is a process during logistics or distribution of goods, where the goods which are being transported are monitored as per their locations, i.e. previous, current & next location. At the beginning of this period this indicator has increased during 2007 to 2010 from 3.2 to 3.33 then in 2014 went down to reach 3.15 and by the year 2016 it was about 3.25.
International shipment: This dimension gives an estimate of the country’s performance in arranging shipments at competitive prices. In 2007 was around 2.9 then it has made improvement to reach 3.2 by 2016.
Logistics competence: The LPI’s indicator relating to competence and quality of logistics services measures the overall competence of the logistics services provided by parties within the logistics system. Achieving logistics excellence requires continuous improvement in reliability, responsiveness and well-functioning support services. In 2010, quality of logistics service was around 3.3 and it was the best performance during the years then it has decreased by 2016.
Figure 12. KSA 2016 baseline position and 2020 target in the LPI
(Source: Transport Ministry of Saudi Arabia)
Saudi Arabia Domestic Logistics Performance
Number of border agencies:
The number of export agencies was 2 in 2007, after a little bit fluctuations it remained at 2 in 2016 as well so we do not see much improvement in the number of export agency. On the other hand the number of import agencies was 1.8 in 2007 but it increased to 2 in 2016 therefore, there was an improvement in import border agencies. Percentage of physical inspection; in 2007 it was 32 %, but it has improved much faster and now in 2016 it is 61.99%. So it is a major improvement in this indicator.
|
Saudi Arabia |
2016 |
2014 |
2012 |
2010 |
2007 |
|
Export time and cost / Port or airport supply chain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
47km |
300Km |
132km
|
|
|
|
Lead time (days) |
3 days |
8 days |
5 days |
2.29 days
|
|
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
1000US$ |
506US$
|
|
|
|
Export time and cost / Land supply chain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
108km |
300Km |
186km
|
|
|
|
Lead time (days) |
2 days |
8 days |
3 days |
|
|
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
1000US$ |
932US$
|
|
|
|
Import time and cost / Port or airport supply chain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
104km |
300Km |
145km
|
|
|
|
Lead time (days) |
7 days |
9 days |
6 days |
6.32 days
|
|
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
1000US$ |
1225US$
|
|
|
|
Import time and cost / Land supply chain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
595km |
|
|
|
|
|
Lead time (days) |
13 days |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments meeting quality criteria (%) |
64.65% |
40% |
78.67%
|
|
|
|
Number of agencies – exports |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3.5
|
2
|
|
Number of agencies – imports |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3
|
1.8
|
|
Number of documents – exports |
3 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
Number of documents – imports |
2 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
Clearance time without physical inspection (days) |
2 days |
5 days |
3 days |
3.98 days
|
3.9 days
|
|
Clearance time with physical inspection (days) |
4 days |
5 days |
4 days |
7.61 days
|
|
|
Physical inspection (%) |
61.99% |
35% |
36.23%
|
65.52%
|
32%
|
|
Multiple inspection (%) |
5.72% |
35% |
3.2%
|
3.39%
|
50%
|
|
Declarations submitted and processed electronically and on-line (%) |
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
Importers use a licensed Customs Broker (%) |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Able to choose the location of the final clearance (%) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Goods released pending customs clearance (%) |
66.67% |
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Saudi Arabia during the years 2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016
(Source: world Bank)
Table 3 compares the domestic logistics performance of Saudi Arabia for 2007-2016 period.
Possibility of a review procedure:
In 2007, possibility of review procedure was 50%. This indicator also Custom Clearance: In 2007 custom clearance was 3.9 days, it also improved over time and now the clearance is made in 2 days. Multiple inspections (%): In 2010 multiple inspections was 3.39 percent and it improved now towards 5.72%. So the country has also improved in this sector. Clearance time with physical inspection (days): In 2010 clearance time was 3.98 days, now in 2016 it is 4 days, So the country does not showed much improvement in the clearance time with physical inspection. Cost: The cost has decreased significantly from 2007 to 2016. Trade logistics are playing a better role for the country now. It had introduced different cost criteria according to the number of days. Shipments meeting quality criteria (%): The quality criteria shipments have reduced over time from 78.67 in 2012 to 64.65% in 2016. So the country should focus on this and try to improve this percentage.
Number of documents: Number of documents for the import and export has not showed much variation over time.
The biggest problem is customs clearance procedures and delays. According to the World Bank, the average number of container clearance days in 2014 is nine days, while in Dubai two days. The second problem there is no train to transport goods between the port of Jeddah and the port of Dammam and the port of Jubail and the dry port in Riyadh. The third problem is the need to develop ports and the speed of download and loading of ships and increase the depth of water to enable ports to receive large ships and provide free zones for re-exports. The fourth problem there is no land for logistics areas for logistics companies at reasonable prices in or near the ports. The last problem is that the system does not allow the establishment of logistics services companies that provide all logistic services to the customer, like other developed countries logistically. In other words, companies in the Kingdom are carriers, stockers, trustees or importers. They do not have the right to combine some of these activities, which means that it is impossible to develop this sector in Saudi Arabia without changing these old systems decades ago. However, Saudi Arabia has lunched many programs to enhance LPI and has planned for transformation strategies.
Figure 13. KSA advantages to becoming a logistics hub
(Source: Saudi Vision 2030)
Since 2016, Saudi Arabia has made progress in improving its logistics services, infrastructure and traceability to meet world class standards. Import and export processes are more organized and governance structures and regulations are being reformed and they open a path to markets and private sector involved. KSA is also pushing public-private partnerships both to finance its infrastructure and to acquire capabilities from other top logistics markets. The good news is that investment money is beginning to roll in. In a report by Al-Masha Capital, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are deemed the most attractive targets for logistics investments in the region and among the easiest markets to operate in.
4.2 Saudi Arabia Compared to its region
Figure 14. Saudi Arabia Compared to Middle East and North Africa Region
(Source: World Bank)
According to the data, in 2016 it seems likely that Saudi Arabia LPI score was 3.16 and none OECD was about 3.15 compare them with their region 2.89. There was no difference between Saudi and non OECD high income countries but Saudi was in better position compared to the average of Middle East and North Africa region. Saudi was better in terms with the exception of customs and logistics competence compared to its region and income group.
Table 4. LPI of Saudi Arabia & High income group & Region Middle East
(Source: World Bank)
Saudi Arabia against top performer in region (United Arab Emirates)
One of the major objectives of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in terms of logistics is to be the regional leader (Saudi 2030 Vision, 2017). Currently United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the regional leader.
Figure 15. Saudi Arabia against top performer in region (United Arab Emirates)
(Source: World Bank)
As shown in Figure 14, UAE has made significant progressive compared to Saudi Arabia in its logistics performance. In 2016, the overall LPI score reached 4.00 while Saudi Arabia LPI score was around 3.16. This is 79% of UAE overall performance which means to be the regional leader Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 21% improvements assuming that UAE remains at its 2016 level.
In The United Arab Emirates, Infrastructure and Timeliness were above 4.00 while other dimensions almost around 4.00. In Saudi Arabia, all dimensions were above 3.00 except customs which is the weakest indicator. Dubai Logistics City (DLC) is an integrated logistics platform with all transport modes, logistics and value added services, including light manufacturing and assembly, in a single customs bonded and Free Zone environment. DLC is attached to the upcoming Dubai World Central International Airport and adjacent to the JAFZA (free zones of UAE)
Dubai: The current regional leader in logistics
The UAE and Dubai in particular, is the preeminent logistics hub in the Middle East. The UAE has been in the logistics game for decades and now, as an established leader, is well ahead of KSA in most aspects of performance: On the World Bank’s 2016 Logistics Performance Index (LPI), UAE ranks 13 compared to Saudi Arabia’s No. 52 ranking and on the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitive Index, the UAE ranks 17 compared to Saudi’s 30. UAE outperforms Saudi Arabia in all international logistics dimensions.
|
2016 |
United Arab Emirates |
Saudi Arabia |
|
Export time and cost / Port or airport supply chain
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
70km |
47km |
|
Lead time (days) |
2 days |
3 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Export time and cost / Land supply chain
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
307km |
108km |
|
Lead time (days) |
3 days |
2 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Import time and cost / Port or airport supply chain
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
107km |
104km |
|
Lead time (days) |
2 days |
7 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Import time and cost / Land supply chain |
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
265km |
595km |
|
Lead time (days) |
2 days |
13 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Shipments meeting quality criteria (%) |
82.28% |
64.65% |
|
Number of agencies – exports |
3 |
2 |
|
Number of agencies – imports |
3 |
2 |
|
Number of documents – exports |
3 |
3 |
|
Number of documents – imports |
3 |
2 |
|
Clearance time without physical inspection (days) |
1 day |
2 days |
|
Clearance time with physical inspection (days) |
1 day |
4 days |
|
Physical inspection (%) |
13.98% |
61.99% |
Table 5. Domestic Logistics Comparison between United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia
(Source: World Bank)
Table 5 compares the domestic logistics performance of UAE and Saudi Arabia. The lead time for export using sea ports and airport supply chains is two days in United Arab Emirate compared to three days in Saudi Arabia, but when using land based supply chains, the lead time in Saudi Arabia is better than United Arab Emirate). The lead time for import using sea ports and airport supply chains is two days in United Arab Emirate compared to seven days in Saudi Arabia. Using land to deliver goods takes two days in the United Arab Emirate while in Saudi Arabia takes tertian days. Also, the shipments meeting quality in United Arab Emirate is better than Saudi Arabia and the number of agencies and documents for export and import in United Arab Emirate are more than of Saudi Arabia. Finally, the clearance time doesn’t take much time in the United Arab Emirate (one day) compared to four days in Saudi Arabia.
4.3 Saudi Arabia compared to Taiwan (ranked 25 in 2016)
According to vision 2030, share of non-oil exports are expected to increase from 16% to 50% and the global ranking in the LPI from 52 to 25. In 2016, Taiwan is ranked number 25.
|
Country |
Year |
LPI Rank |
LPI Score |
Customs |
Infrastructure |
International Shipments |
Logistics competence |
Tracking & tracing |
Timelines |
|
Taiwan |
2016 |
25 |
3.70 |
3.23 |
3.57 |
3.57 |
3.95 |
3.59 |
4.25 |
|
KSA |
2016 |
52 |
3.16 |
2.69 |
3.24 |
3.23 |
3.00 |
3.25 |
3.53 |
Table 6. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Logistics Performance Index
(Source: World Bank)
In order to achieve its LPI vision 2030, Saudi Arabia needs to make major improvements in all its LPI dimensions. As shown in Table 6, in all six dimensions, Taiwan performs much better than Saudi Arabia in 2016. Saudi customs score is 2.69 compared to 3.23 for Taiwan. This is 83.3%% of Taiwan overall performance which means to improve its ranking to number 25 Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 16.7% improvements assuming that rest of the world including Taiwan remains at their 2016 level.
Figure 16. LPI Comparison Taiwan versus Saudi Arabia-2016
(Source: World Bank)
Saudi Arabia ‘customs compared to Taiwan ‘customs
Although Taiwan’s trade rules and regulations are at times quite complicated, it is becoming easier and more convenient for foreign businesspeople and manufacturers to do business with Taiwan. Rules and regulations have been simplified, infrastructure facilities improved, and trade services enhanced.(Doing Business in Taiwan: 2016 Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies).
|
Saudi Arabia |
Taiwan |
|
|
2007 |
2.72 |
3.25 |
|
2010 |
2.91 |
3.35 |
|
2012 |
2.79 |
3.42 |
|
2014 |
2.86 |
3.55 |
|
2016 |
2.69 |
3.23 |
Table 7. Saudi Arabia ‘customs compared to Taiwan ‘customs
(Source: World Bank “customs”)
Figure 17. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Customs
(Source: World Bank)
Figure 16 and Table 7 compare customs performance in Taiwan and Saudi Arabia. After 2007, Taiwan rose remarkably for the next three years. Overall, it can be seen that over the period, Taiwan has increased remarkably to reach the highest point of 3.55 in 2014. In Saudi Arabia there was a fluctuant trend in the customs. Looking at the detail, in 2010 was reached the highest score 2.91 while in 2016 was the lowest score and it was about 2.69. This is 83% of Taiwan customs performance which means to improve this indicator its ranking to number 25 Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 17 % improvements assuming that rest of the world including Taiwan remains at their 2016 level. The reason behind that clearing the customs in Saudi Arabia is difficult since the Saudi Customs rules are very stringent. The Saudi customs authority makes it mandatory and allows exporting into Saudi Arabia only when all the SASO “Saudi standards metrology and quality” standards are met. If everything is not in order then the clearance will not be provided by the authorities. There have been cases where slight errors have led to rejection by the customs department. It is thus important to follow the rules laid down by the SASO Certificate.
|
Year |
Saudi Arabia |
Taiwan |
|
2007 |
2.95 |
3.62 |
|
2010 |
3.27 |
3.62 |
|
2012 |
3.22 |
3.77 |
|
2014 |
3.34 |
3.64 |
|
2016 |
3.24 |
3.57 |
Table 8. Saudi Arabia ‘infrastructure compared to Taiwan ‘infrastructure
(Source: World Bank “infrastructure”)
Figure 18. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Infrastructure
(Source: World Bank)
According to figure 17 and table 8, in 2012, Taiwan had the best performance during the years and it reached 3.77 out of 5. In 2016, 3.57 were the lowest score and in 2007, 2010, and 2014 Taiwan was around 3.64. In general, Taiwan’ infrastructure has increased at the first three years then it has decreased. On the other hand, in 2014, Saudi Arabia had the best performance of score 3.34 out of 5. In 2016, Taiwan was 3.57 and Saudi Arabia was 3.24 this is 91% of Taiwan infrastructure performance which means to improve its ranking to number 25 Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 7% improvements. Overall, Saudi Arabia has made improvement in the infrastructure performance during the years, but still need improvement if Saudi Arabia wants to ranked 25.
|
Year |
Saudi Arabia |
Taiwan |
|
2007 |
2.93 |
3.65 |
|
2010 |
2.80 |
3.64 |
|
2012 |
3.10 |
3.58 |
|
2014 |
2.93 |
3.71 |
|
2016 |
3.23 |
3.57 |
Table 9. Saudi Arabia ‘international shipments compared to Taiwan ‘international shipment
(Source: World Bank “international shipments”)
Figure 19. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan international shipment
(Source: World Bank)
According to the data in the figure 18 and table 9, from 2007 to 2012 the performance of international shipment in Taiwan has decreased then in 2014, it has increased and reached 3.71 and it was the best performance during the years. Finally, in 2016, the score was 3.57 which were the lowest score. In Saudi Arabia, the performance was fluctuated during the years and the highest performance was in 2016 and the worst performance in 2010. This is 90% of Taiwan international shipments performance in 2016 which means to improve it Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 10% improvements.
|
Year |
Saudi Arabia |
Taiwan |
|
2007 |
2.88 |
3.58 |
|
2010 |
3.33 |
3.65 |
|
2012 |
2.99 |
3.68 |
|
2014 |
3.11 |
3.60 |
|
2016 |
3.00 |
3.95 |
Table 10. Saudi Arabia ‘logistics competence compared to Taiwan ‘logistics competence
(Source: World Bank “logistics competence”)
Figure 20. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Logistics competence
(Source: World Bank)
Table 10 and figure 19 provide Logistics competence in Taiwan and Saudi Arabia. Taiwan was better than Saudi Arabia. Recently, in 2016, Taiwan has reached 3.95 out of 5 compared with Saudi Arabia 3.00 out of 5. Looking to the details, the performance in Saudi Arabia was fluctuated. In Taiwan, the performance has changed and increased during the years. This is 76% of Taiwan international shipments performance which means to improve it Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 25% improvements.
|
Saudi Arabia |
Taiwan |
|
|
2007 |
3.02 |
3.60 |
|
2010 |
3.32 |
4.04 |
|
2012 |
3.21 |
3.72 |
|
2014 |
3.15 |
3.79 |
|
2016 |
3.25 |
3.59 |
Table 11. The difference in Tracking and Tracing between Saudi Arabia and Taiwan
(Source: World Bank “Tracking and Tracing”)
Figure 21. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Tracking and Tracing
(Source: World Bank)
Figure 20 and table 11 show the tracking and tracing score in Taiwan and Saudi Arabia. In 2010, Taiwan has made the best performance of score 4.04 out of 5. In 2016 it has decreased to reach 3.59 and it was the lowest score. Also, in Saudi Arabia, in 2010, was the highest score 3.32 out of 5 after that in 2012 and 2014 has decreased slightly and in 2016 has increased again to reach 3.25 out of 5. This is 91% of Taiwan tracking and tracing performance which means to improve it Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 9% improvements.
|
Year |
Saudi Arabia |
Taiwan |
|
2007 |
3.65 |
4.18 |
|
2010 |
3.78 |
3.95 |
|
2012 |
3.76 |
4.10 |
|
2014 |
3.55 |
4.02 |
|
2016 |
3.63 |
4.25 |
Table 12. The Differences in Timeliness between Taiwan and Saudi Arabia
(Source: World Bank “Timeliness”)
Figure 22. Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Timeliness
(Source: World Bank)
Figure 21 and table 12 show the Timeliness performance during 2007 to 2016 for Saudi Arabia and Taiwan. In Taiwan has shown improvement during the years. In 2016, Taiwan has made significant performance and it has reached 4.25 out of 5. One the other hand, Saudi Arabia’ performance has decreased and it has reached 3.63 out of 5. Overall, Taiwan was better than Saudi Arabia in this dimension. This is 85% of Taiwan timeliness performance in 2016 which means to improve it Saudi Arabia needs to achieve more than 25% improvements.
|
2016 |
Taiwan |
Saudi Arabia |
|
Export time and cost / Port or airport supply chain
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
111km |
47km |
|
Lead time (days) |
1 days |
3 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Export time and cost / Land supply chain
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
349km |
108km |
|
Lead time (days) |
2 days |
2 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Import time and cost / Port or airport supply chain
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
166km |
104km |
|
Lead time (days) |
1 days |
7 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Import time and cost / Land supply chain
|
|
|
|
Distance (kilometers) |
646km |
595km |
|
Lead time (days) |
2 days |
13 days |
|
Cost (US$) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Shipments meeting quality criteria (%) |
95.53% |
64.65% |
|
Number of agencies – exports |
3 |
2 |
|
Number of agencies – imports |
3 |
2 |
|
Number of documents – exports |
4 |
3 |
|
Number of documents – imports |
4 |
2 |
|
Clearance time without physical inspection (days) |
N/A |
2 days |
|
Clearance time with physical inspection (days) |
1 days |
4 days |
|
Physical inspection (%) |
2.50% |
61.99% |
|
|
|
|
Table 13. Taiwan compared to Saudi Arabia in 2016
(Source: World Bank)
Table 13 compares Taiwan and Saudi Arabia domestic logistics in 2016. The lead time for export using sea ports and airport supply chains is two days in Taiwan compared to three days in Saudi Arabia but when using land based supply chains; the lead time is the same (two days). Taiwan has an advantage only if exporters use sea ports and airports.
Also, the shipments meeting quality in Taiwan is better than Saudi Arabia and the number of agencies and documents for export and import in Taiwan more than Saudi Arabia. Finely, the clearance time doesn’t take much time in Taiwan (one day) compare to Saudi Arabia four days.
Chapter 5: Conclusion
The logistics performance of Saudi Arabia overtime is mixed. There was an improvement in the overall LPI from 2007 to 2010, but from 2010 to 2016 it went down.
Trade has changed over the years and export and import have increased significantly and the logistics performance index has improved in some dimensions. For example, infrastructure, tracking and ease of arranging shipment have improved slightly, while the customs is still complicated and it is the main obstacle that faces supply chain and the quality of logistics services.
Saudi Arabia has announced that some programs have achieved their targets and has started work to improve others. They launched a nine point strategy as a transformation plan to achieve their goal. It can be seen from the research the improvement in the export and import sectors and what government done to improve trade.
Even though Saudi Arabia has taken effective steps to improve transportation and infrastructure, it still needs more attention from the government in specific areas such as rail and seaport rail infrastructure appears to be a problem. Digital technology will be a key enabler and driver of the numerous changes envisaged by Vision 2030, with the goal of developing the nation’s digital infrastructure and stimulating the related economic sectors, industries, and private sector entities. The digital transformation is the most important component that the government should be concentrating on. Saudi Arabia should have a digital strategy for their organization. Mohamed bin Salman the Crown prince of Saudi Arabia tried to attract foreign investors in the area by making new policies to meet the international standards; and in one year, the kingdom has become a convenient environment
for business markets. Also, the government has paid attention to enhance seaport and reform the rail sector.
Today, more than a year into the Vision, the path forward is taking shape. Import and export processes are being streamlined. Governance structures and regulations are being reformed, opening a path toward market liberalization and private-sector participation. In addition, public-private partnerships are helping finance the infrastructure and bringing in capabilities from the top logistics markets. By 2030, Saudi Arabia expects to be among the foremost logistics hubs in the region.
If Saudi Arabia wants to be ranked 25 like Taiwan in the logistics performance, it should create convenient environment for foreign businesses and manufacturers to do business. The government has also attracted investors to Saudi Arabia by ensuring a conducive investment climate and developing the right incentives for private sector participation.
Becoming a logistics leader region in the region, KSA needs to increase the following three factors of connectivity, infrastructure and processes. An integrated private sector participation will enhance the ecosystem that allows logistics to thrive.
With the fallout in global oil prices, Saudi Arabia is charting a new direction towards developing an economy that is non-oil dependent by announcing a bold reform in line with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030. The reform would have long-term effects on the economic structure but also yield several short-term opportunities, such as the re-tendering of logistics contracts. Considering the 2030 vision, the diversification milestones also mean that the GCC governments will rely less on government financing and increase investment by the private sector. Fabian also asserts that creating successful partnerships between private sector investors and the government will be a critical factor in shaping the economy over the coming years.
The logistics industry in Saudi Arabia is confronting a time of many changes. Considering the 2030 vision, the diversification will rely less on government financing and in- crease investment by the private sector. Creating successful partnerships between private sec- tor investors and the government will be a critical factor in shaping the economy over the coming years. Vision 2030 will stimulate the economic growth of non-oil economic sectors and open new services and products fulfilling the pursuit of Saudi Arabia to become a global logistics hub.
Improving logistic performance are very useful for declining the various nature of cost. Improvement in logistics activities leads to less loss of goods in transit, so it leads to low trading cost, due to less damage of goods, company has not borne extra production cost, which are beneficial for the development of country. Improving in logistics performance will help a company effectively fight its bottlenecks and reduce any types of inefficiency. This will help it improve its productivity, production and thus output. Improving logistics performance will give an advantage to the company over other firms who are still fighting logistics issues and high trading costs.
For its rail organize Saudi Arabia has colossal development intends to interface the east and west drifts and give cargo and traveler administrations into the furthest north of the nation. In light of the substantial measure of logistics and infrastructural ventures being created in the meantime, the locale faces an asset crush, which is driving up costs and debilitating the feasibility of a few plans. There are insufficient individuals with the correct aptitudes accessible to convey the ventures, including contractual workers, frameworks and moving stock.
References
Andreas, H., (2013). Logistics in Saudi Arabia.
Andrii, G., Constantin, D., Nataliia D., (2017). The Role of Consumers in Logistics Systems.
Azmat, G., (2017, December). The Logistics Performance Effect in International Trade.
Chia-Hsun C. & Po-Lin L. (2017). An evaluation of logistics policy enablers between
Taiwan and the UK.
Connecting to Compete. (2007). Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics
Performance Index and Its Indicators report.
Connecting to Compete. (2010). Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics
Performance Index and Its Indicators report.
Connecting to Compete. (2016). Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics
Performance Index and Its Indicators report.
Corporate Partnership Board Report, (2015). Drivers of Logistics performance: a case study
of Turkey. (53).
Fabian, T., (2016). Saudi Arabia Transportation and Logistics Opportunities Report.
ITC. (2007-2016) Export and Import. International Trade Center
from http://exportpotential.intracen.org/
Jane, K., Patricia S., (2011). To What Extent Are High- Quality Logistics Services Trade
Facilitating?
John, L. (2016). The surprising importance of governance in the logistic performance of
Nations.
Kristina, V., Jolanta, S., Lidia, D., (2017). Assessment of Transport Specialists’
Competencies.
Patricia, S., (2018). Logistics Will Drive Saudi Arabia's Post-Oil Era. An evaluation of
logistics policy enablers between Taiwan and the UK Chia-Hsun Chang and Po-LinLai Department of International logistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Rosane, Caio, Jose, (2015). Evaluation of logistics performance index of Brazil in the
International trade.
Transport Ministry. (2017). Saudi Arabia’s Big Logistics Play. ASC Staff.
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. (2014). Turku
School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys.
World Bank, Logistics Performance Index. (2007-2017).
Yen-Chun J. W., Tsai Y., Sun L., Lai R., Chiu M., (2017). The location advantages and
persistence of the performance for the Taiwan logistic company: A case study.
Mohammad Reza. (2013) The Relationship between Logistics and Economic Development in
Indonesia.
Zhofang Chu. (2012) Logistics and Economic Growth: a panel data approach.
Appendix-A
LPI Global Ranking 2016
(Source: World Bank, Logistic Performance Index)
World Trade 2007-2016
2007 Import Export 14097221790 13777495680 2016 Import Export 16045698257 15913143458
SAUDI ARABIA IMPORT AND EXPORT: 2007-2016
EXPORT 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 874403 1175482 721109 941785 1367620 1456502 1409523 1284122 763313 688423 IMPORT 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 338088 431753 358290 400736 493449 583473 630582 651876 655033 525636YEAR
MILLIONS SAUDI RIYA
The six dimensions for KSA & Taiwan
Taiwan LPI Score Customs Infrastructure International shipments Logistics competence Tracking & tracing Timelines 3.7 3.23 3.57 3.57 3.95 3.59 4.25 KSA LPI Score Customs Infrastructure International shipments Logistics competence Tracking & tracing Timelines 3.16 2.69 3.24 3.23 3 3.25 3.53
Saudi Arabia & Taiwan Customs
Saudi Arabia 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 2.72 2.91 2.79 2.86 2.69 Taiwan 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 3.25 3.35 3.42 3.55 3.23
Saudi Arabia 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 2.95 3.27 3.22 3.34 3.24 Taiwan 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 3.62 3.62 3.77 3.64 3.57
Saudi Arabia 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 2.93 2.8 3.1 2.93 3.23 Taiwan 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 3.65 3.64 3.58 3.71 3.57
Logistics competence
Saudi Arabia 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 2.88 3.33 2.99 3.11 3 Taiwan 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 3.58 3.65 3.68 3.6 3.95
Tracking and Tracing
Saudi Arabia 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 3.02 3.32 3.21 3.15 3.25 Taiwan 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 3.6 4.04 3.72 3.79 3.59
Timeliness
Saudi Arabia 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 3.65 3.78 3.76 3.55 3.63 Taiwan 2007 2010 2012 2014 2016 4.18 3.95 4.0999999999999996 4.0199999999999996 4.25