PE & E -Tri

Brucele
Mohan.P.FE.pdf

Running head: PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 1

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS

Module code Number: KB7037/AT7024

Student Name: Mohan Chandra Chebathini

Student ID: W19046970

Research in Physics Education: A Study of Content Analysis

Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering

Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE18ST, United Kingdom

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 2

Table of Contents

1. Section A: Description of the project …………………………………………………..3

2. Section B: Feasibility and Economic analyses of the project …………………………8

3. Section C: Discussion …………………….…………………………………………….16

4. Section D: Executive Summary ……………………………………………………….18

5. References …………………………………………………………………...………….24

6. Appendix …………………………………………………………………….………….26

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 3

Section A: Description of the project

Background knowledge

Any project is deemed to be feasible or even economically viable in case the economic

benefits realized from such a project exceeds the overall economic costs after it has been

analyzed for the whole society. In this project entitled research in physics education which was a

study for content analysis and carried out by Huseyin Uzunboylu and Gulsum Asiksoy in 2014,

the feasibility of this project can be analyzed. As far as this project is concerned, an analysis of a

research in physics education had been reached via the Turkish national academic network and

information center. Also, the physics education has been developing from time to time and this is

all that necessitated the above researchers to conduct a study in this field to identify this

development in the field of physics education with a specific focus being laid on the Turkish

National academic network and information center. Whenever physics is considered as subject

titles, the largest portion of the studies is about the electric and mechanical physics. However, the

majority of the studies are undertaken or analyzed via the angle or dimension of research titles

that have been investigated. As a result, and based on the researchers involved in this study, a

notable number of researches were conducted mainly in 2013 and this can be described as the

moment when the researches in physics education reached at the top. Therefore, based on the

economic status, the feasibility of this research can be carried out effectively to identify how

feasible it was and if or not it was economically feasible.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 4

An image to illustrate the current trends in development of physics education

Source: American Association of Physics Teachers

Introduction to the project

The initial thing to mention about this project is its name and the specific title of the

project was research in physics education: a study of content analysis. As far as this topic is

concerned, the scientific study within the field of education appears to be the greatly significant

indicator of the extent that the education systems of the majority of the countries have developed

and this is as emphasized by Arik and Turkmen in 2009. It is also apparent that a considerable

increase in that number of studies that have been carried out in education field has been realized

within the recent years. As for the value of this research, the project was highly valuable and the

specific value that it has is that it measures the extent at which physics education has developed

in the countries within the past years. As an example, due to the advances in technology, the

physics education has also advanced. The value of the project may also be seen from the sense

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 5

that it dealt with the debatable issues revolving around the development of physics education in a

number of countries where such issues managed to arise.

Due to this advancement, physics tends to be the discipline that comes into the minds of

individuals after the mentioning of the term technology as it has helped this field to grow to a

great extent. As an example, and also has mentioned by Dorothy and Siraj in 2010, the majority

of the instruments and tools of technology are revolving around the field of physics as well as the

interpretation of the physical laws. The above instance makes scientific research to be

considerably important when it comes to the development of the education field.The other two

things to mention about this project are timescale and the location of the project. As for the

timescale of this project, it is worth to mention that the project had a large scope of time meaning

that it was conducted for around two months. The timescale was extensive to ensure that a

variety of data, information and the required statistics had been considered and covered

adequately. The location of the project was in Turkey and mainly reached via the Turkish

national academic network and its information center and also EBCSO. As shown by the image

below, there were 105 articles that were analyzed in the project to show the development of

physics education between 2008 and 2013.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 6

Table to illustrate the distribution of articles by years between 2008 and 2013

Years Frequency Percentage

2008 17 16.19

2009 18 17.14

2010 16 15.24

2011 17 16.19

2012 14 13.33

2013 23 21.90

Total 105 100

Literature review

According to Rosa Safirotun and Jumadi Jumadi in 2022, a significant increase in physics

education has been experienced within the past years and the peak period has been around 2013

onwards. Despite that there were limited studies in this field within the past years, certain steps

had been made to venture into studies in this important field. By focusing mainly on the Turkish

nation, there have been tremendous steps being carried out to ensure that this physics education

field had been exploited and this is an information that has been emphasized by the research

involved in the study being considered in this case. The other important thing that these

individuals have mentioned is that research in physics education as well as this field itself has

been changing from time to time and a notable reason account for this change. The reason is that

this change follows that phenomenon of those problems that keep on arising in physics education

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 7

and which requires to be addressed immediately. As a result of this desire to address these

emerging problems, there also arose the desire for the trends in physics education to change. The

same information has been emphasized by Huseyin Uzunboylu and Gulsum Asiksoy in their

project where they indicated that due to the advances in technology, physics education also

attained an increased moment.

Moreover, in a study by Surya Gumilar and Ali Ismail in their study dated May 2021,

there were numerous laboratory activities that were experienced in the Indonesian physics

textbooks. According to the above individuals, the increased activities were a representation or

an indication that there was a development in the physics education in the countries not only in

Turkey but also in Indonesia. Just like the analysis of the articles to examine the development of

physics education in Turkey, the above two individuals analyzed or extended the crucial content

analysis of those physics textbooks in an attempt to examine those levels of physics education

and laboratory activities as being the evidence of the expansion and development of physics

education in countries. Also, as revealed by the authors of this study, physics education does not

involve only learning but it entails activities like practical that enhance the learning of physics

even to a great extent. Therefore, the key emphasis laid down by the above individuals was that

physics education gained increased momentum in the past years and mainly during the year

2013.

Additionally, according to Onder, Nuray and Oktay, Ozlem among others, a significant

trend has been experienced in the growth of physics education in schools. For instance, as per

these individuals in a study conducted in 2014, 125 studies had been published between the years

2004 and 2011. Out of these studies, 46 of these studies were about or related to the physics

education. The 46 articles were also examined by using certain terms such as demographic

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 8

properties like the gender of the people, and institutions. It is also important to reveal that certain

and key concepts were studied in these physics education and the notable ones were

thermodynamics, light and optics, waves and even vibration which were among the other topics

that were studied in the field of physics education. It is also important to mention of an aspect

such as the physics education gaining momentum not only at the secondary levels but also in the

higher learning institutions such as colleges and Universities where this education gained

increased momentum. Therefore, all of the above information is geared to indicate that physics

education continued to develop from time to time and this development was experienced in a

number of countries with specific examples being Indonesia and Turkey.

Project briefing information

Just like any other project, the above research had its objective, scope and also some

factors that led to its critical success. Among the key objectives of this research was to guide the

researchers planning or intending to do some studies in the field of physical education through

the specification of tendencies of 105 articles on physics education. The specification of the

tendencies was to be done in terms of the subject areas, research titles, methods, techniques of

analyzing the data as well as sampling types and this is also as emphasized by Turkmen in 2017.

The other objective of the project was to act as a guide for the teachers and educators as well as

the learners with some regards to the scientific debate. As an example, the scientific field is one

that is filled with a lot of debates and this project aimed at ensuring that such debates have been

handled effectively. Regarding the scope of this project, the boundaries of the project had been

drawn and that is the areas that it will cover. The creation of the boundaries was meant to ensure

that this project sticks on the line it was intended to remain. Also, under this scope, the goals of

the project were also defined exactly and the project deliverables were drawn which the project

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 9

would be working toward and also the integration of technology which is a key component as

emphasized by Karamustafaoğlu, in 2009. The factors leading to the success of the project

included drawing clear boundaries and setting aside enough resources for the execution of the

project.

Summary of information from the database

a) List of the major stakeholders

Stakeholders The role played The contribution of the

stakeholders (US dollars)

International Monetary Fund Financier (50 million)

The Government of Turkey Investor and Financier (80 million)

The people of Turkey Consumers Unapplicable

Project directors Consultants (10 million)

Project managers In charge of health and safety (10 million)

Accountants Budgeting for the project and

management of the

stakeholders

Unapplicable

Turkish national academic

network and information

center

Research analysis (30 million)

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 10

b) List of the costs throughout the project life cycle

Costs Amount (US dollars)

Travelling costs (25 million)

Labor costs (25 million)

Utility costs (10 million)

Setup costs (10 million)

Transaction costs (10 million)

Depreciation of materials for the research (10 million)

Consultation fees (10 million)

NB: The above costs are both fixed and variable costs that were associated with the execution of

this project. As an example, travelling, consultation, and depreciation costs were all variable

costs while the rest like setup costs, labor, utility and consultation costs were all fixed costs. Out

of the above two types of costs, the total costs will be obtained from the formula.

Total Costs (TC) = Fixed Costs (FC) + Variable Costs (VC).

c) Macro-environment surrounding the project

The macro-environmental aspects also surrounded the above project and this can be best

analyzed by doing a PESTEL analysis. The PESTEL aspect comprises the political, economic,

social, technical and environmental as well as the legal aspects. On the political aspect or sphere,

the project was prone to political influence especially from the Turkish government where it was

conducted. The main motive of this influence was the desire for the government being involved

in the study bearing in mind that it was among the financiers of the project. Therefore, the

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 11

political motive of the government of the day was realized. Economically, there was a desire for

having enough resources to facilitate the execution of the project. The economic situation or

status of the researchers necessitated the coming up with various sources of funds to enable the

project to be a success. The social aspect also surrounded the project in that there were some

social influences especially the religious considerations of the participants in the project that also

influenced the execution of this project. The technical aspect entailed the incorporation of

technology since greater advances have been made in the field of technology and also applicable

in the education field. The environmental aspect entailed ensuring that the project is

environmentally friendly and would not harm either the human beings or the environment where

it was being conducted. The legal aspect of the project was that it was to be conducted in line

with the prevailing rules and regulations that have been laid down by the government of the day.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 12

Section B: Feasibility and Economic analyses of the project

A table for the techniques used in the economic analysis of the project

Technique Description

Financial statement and ratio analysis Looks at the prevailing financial statement of

the project such as the revenue generated and

costs incurred.

Supply and demand

Multiplier effect

IRR

Payback period

Net present value

Profitability index

The above techniques of project appraisal are

all aimed at determining whether the project

is realizing a profit, hence deemed to be

feasible or vice versa.

Decision trees Determines the feasibility of a project where

there are choices to make regarding a viable

project.

Earned Value Analysis Based on the value that will be earned after a

certain project gets executed.

Analytical hierarchy process The greater the value generated, the highly

feasible a project is.

Imposition of taxes and inflation Whenever taxes and inflation result in an

economy, the operating costs increases and

the project tends not to be feasible.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 13

B1: Assessment of financial health using financial statement and ratio analysis

Based on the prevailing financial statement as well as the ratio analysis, the feasibility of the

above project can be identified, (Jensen, 2006). The key financial statement in this case will be

the revenue generated by the stakeholders and the costs incurred in the execution of the project.

By looking at the table of the list of the stakeholders, the total revenue generated by the

stakeholders can be identified. The other essential information regarding the financial statement

is the total costs incurred in the execution of the project. Therefore, by getting both the total

revenue generated and the costs incurred, the two metrics can be compared so that the feasibility

of the project may be identified as below.

Total costs = fixed costs + variable costs

TC = $ 25 million + $ 25 million + $ 10 million + $ 10 million + $ 10 million + $ 10 million + $

10 million = $ 100 million.

Similarly, the revenue generated from the stakeholders associated with the project may be

obtained as follows;

Total revenue = $ 50 million + $ 80 million + $ 30 million + $ 10 million + $ 10 million= $ 180

million.

Out of the above statistics, profitability value can be realized and that is;

Total revenue – Total costs = $180 million - $ 100 million = $ 80 million.

As a result of this the project is viable since a positive value has been obtained.

The other aspect of evaluating this feasibility is the ratio analysis. It is also a quantitative way of

attaining a strong insight into the liquidity of this project and its operational efficiency as well as

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 14

its profitability, (Reutlinger,2010). Being a quantitative method, the values compared above, i.e.,

total revenue and total costs can be examined and a positive value has been obtained. Out of this

value, it can be deduced that the project is feasible since a positive value has been obtained.

Major assumptions associated with financial statement and ratio analysis

Assumption Description

Economic entity The above assumption is that the financial

statement and ratio analysis will be a true

reflection of all that is happening in the

society.

Fiscal period As for this assumption, it is believed that the

value of financial statements and ratio

analysis are applicable during the moment

when they have been obtained.

Going concern The assumption believes that the business is

operating and it will generate some revenue or

a certain profit.

Stability of the amount The assumption entails believing that there

are no instances of inflation or deflation in the

society where such a transaction is being

carried out.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 15

B2: Project appraisal using supply and demand, multiplier effect, NPV, IRR, payback period and

profitability index.

Supply and demand

Whenever appraising this project by using the supply and demand aspect, it is important to argue

that the project is feasible. The physics education has taken a great increase as mentioned above

especially during 2013. The above aspect can be regarded as the demand for this physics

education within the educational field. Due to the advances in technology and also in the growth

of human knowledge, physics education managed to increase and this can be viewed as the

supply of this thing that has been highly demanded. As a result, it becomes important to indicate

that this project was high feasible to identify how well the physics education managed to develop

in the countries.

Multiplier effect

By looking at the project, it will aid in the generation of a positive multiplier effect. The great the

level of literacy in this field of physics education, the more the rate of enlightenment and the

society is likely to benefit in terms of employment which will in return, lead to a significant

growth of the economy. The examination of the developments in this field is also likely to spark

positive attitudes and actions that will be taken to increase the rate of physics education due to

the high demand for venturing into this field. In such a case, then the project is feasible as it is

leading to positive benefits.

Net Present Value

The major basis of identifying the feasibility of this project under the dimension of net present

value mainly lies on how fast the project will start generating some profits or benefits. In other

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 16

words, it is deemed that this project is meant to bear some profits as fast as it is conducted.

Bering the above information in mind, the project was undertaken to identify the development of

physics education in countries with a specific focus on Turkey. Therefore, it can be deemed that

the project will start generating some benefits immediately it is completed and this makes it to be

highly feasible. As an example, after the completion of the project, the findings from it would

indicate that physics education has been developing and increasing. As a result, certain measures

and steps will be taken to enhance it even further and this will be a benefit realized in the shortest

time possible leading to the feasibility of the project.

Mathematically, net present value can be calculated as follows;

NPV = Rt / (1 + i)twhere

Rt = net cashflow at time t

i= discount rate

t = time of the cash flow

The value of NPV that will be obtained will then be used in making some deductions. As an

example, a higher value is important or better than a lower value of NPV. Whenever the value is

large, then the project is feasible and valuable and worth to be considered by the researchers.

IRR

The Internal Rate of Return is also based on the expected future cash flows or benefits that will

be realized as a result of coming up with a certain project, (Hartman, 2004). As an example, the

project was targeted to be at $ 180 million and by investing this amount of money, then the

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 17

future cash flow is expected to be even higher and this is all that leads to the feasibility of the

project.

IRR = The difference between the present or expected value and original value which is divided

by that original value then multiplied by a 100. As an example, the original value of this project

is $ 180 million and if the expected value is $ 200 million, then;

IRR = $ 200 million - $ 180 million = $ 20 million. Then;

($ 20 million /$ 180 million) x 100 =11.11 and this is a significant value to declare the project

being feasible.

Payback period

The above technique is also related or associated with the Net Present Value and the association

is that they are all related with looking at how fast the project will generate some revenue or

benefit. In this case, the project is feasible because it takes a shortened moment for generating

the much-needed benefits that it is intended to provide.

Profitability index

Being a technique that mainly measures the attractiveness of the project to potential investors,

this method is in line with the selected project. Since the project is looking at the developments

in a certain field, it attracts a large number of investors to invest in this project so that more and

more benefits may be realized.

Major assumptions

In the above techniques, it is assumed that the greatest value is one that makes the project to be

deemed as being profitable and hence, feasible.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 18

It is also assumed that if the project turns out to have a positive value, there is a high likelihood

of reinvesting in the project so that more and more benefits may be realized.

There is also an assumption such as the economic conditions remaining stable at the period of

investment without instances like the introduction of taxation and inflation.

B4: Project options appraisal using decision trees

An example of a decision tree used in making a decision.

As a technique of project appraisal, a decision tree entails a diagram for determining the possible

results that come out of a series of choices. While applied in this project, the decision tree can be

used in determining the feasibility of a project. As an example, out of the above decision tree

sample, the net profit might be a positive value meaning that it is a success or a profit and might

also be a negative value implying a loss, hence, the project would not be worth undertaking it.

The value may also be a zero meaning that no loss or profit has been realized and this can also be

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 19

used in determining the feasibility of a project. The net value from this project is a positive value

and this indicates a positive outcome from the project indicating that it is feasible

B5: Multi-dimensional project appraisal using Analytical Hierarchy Process

On this technique, the feasibility of the project can be estimated on the cost effectiveness and

worthiness of the project to be undertaken. For instance, the project was worthy to be carried out

in the sense that it was looking at the development of physics education in the countries. In such

a situation, it was looking at an essential aspect which was worthy to examine. The project was

also cost effective in terms of the funds required for executing it and this leads to a positive

benefit worth to declare it feasible.

B9: Project control using Earned Value Analysis

As a project management technique, the method allows the project manager an opportunity for

measuring the work that has been actually performed beyond that basic review of the schedule

reports and costs, (Zhong, 2011). As mentioned above, the project aimed at validating the growth

of the physics education in the countries. In this project, the feasibility of this project can be

measured by the various stages through which it was executed since it was carried out at

different points. Therefore, at a given point, the project could have been estimated to be at a

certain point of completion. At the moment that a great portion of the project had been

completed as anticipated, then it would have been argued to be a feasible project. Under the

earned value analysis, there are three metrics that are considered also regarded as the sub-

branches of the earned value analysis. The three metrics are as follows;

Planned value, i.e., PV

Actual Value i.e., AV

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 20

The earned value of the concrete work that has been completed already.

By interrelating the above three metrics, then the project can be controlled. The planned value of

the project may be estimated as being worth $ 180 million and the actual value is estimated at $

100 million. With the value of $ 100 million, it can be deduced that the project had been

completed without a deficit but there is a positive value of $ 80 million. The overall deduction is

that the project is highly feasible and indicated by Anbari in 2013 when examining the

application of earned value in project management. The analysis of the earned value may also be

deduced mathematically.

EV = total project budget multiplied by the percentage of project completion.

For instance, at one point, the project was 80% complete meaning that it was almost coming to

completion. Therefore, the earned value of this project would be as follows:

$ 180 million multiplied by 80% = $ 144 million and this was the earned value of the project at

such a particular moment and portion of project execution.

Key assumptions of this technique

Just like the other techniques, the above method of project analysis has its key assumptions.

Among them is that the technique will allow a temporal and intermittent nature of the work of a

project through scheduling of the expenditure based on the plan of the project. There is also an

assumption that the technique will consider the content and context of the planned expenditures

and values of the project. In this technique, it is also assumed that the schedule, scope as well as

the resource characteristics will be integrated into a complex set of measurements.

B10: The effect of tax and inflation on feasibility outcomes

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 21

Imposition of tax and the issue of inflation have a significant effect or influence on the feasibility

outcomes of a given project. As an example, inflation and taxes will tend to increase the prices or

costs of operations. The situation is also one that will mean a deviation in the initial as well as

the final costs of the associated project, (Sell, 2012). By looking back at the total revenue and

total costs for this project as described above, it can be deduced that the introduction of tax and

inflation aspects are likely to increase the operating costs and the overall costs of the project. The

overall impact is that the project may end up not being economically feasible as it would be

anticipated.

Major assumptions

1. Introduction of tax and inflation will destabilize the economy leading to the overall costs

of operating.

2. In the presence of tax and inflation, there will be a continuous fluctuation and this creates

volatility in the growth of the economy.

3. The disposable income will also be reduced as individuals and the economy tends to

consume less when there is inflation and tax aspects.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 22

Section C: Discussion

A project would not be worthwhile if at all a feasibility of such a thing has not been carried out

to identify whether it is feasible or not. The feasibility of a project may also be regarded as its

financial situation which is determined by using the methods and techniques of analyzing the

project or a given portfolio. As for the case of the project under consideration in this discussion,

the major techniques that have been used in identifying the feasibility of this project includes

financial statement and ratio analysis, appraisal using supply and demand, multiplier effect,

NPV, IRR, payback period and profitability index as well as multi-dimensional project appraisal

using Analytical Hierarchy Process. The othersinclude Project options appraisal using decision

trees, project control using Earned Value Analysis and the effect of the tax and inflation on the

outcomes of a project. As mentioned, and discussed under the context of these techniques, the

project was feasible. The overall financial condition of the project is also worthwhile or pleasing

meaning that the overall costs incurred in executing the project are lower as compared to the

benefits that will be realized out of this project as emphasized by Bauer in 2003. Additionally,

the available resources or the funds that have been set aside for the execution of this project are

far much ahead of the proposed costs that is incurred in the project execution. It is also important

to mention about the aspect of the project being at a point of generating some benefits within a

short period and also the return on investment being a higher value and all of these lead to a

certain fact that the project is highly feasible.

All of the above aspects are those which have been examined in the above techniques. In other

words, the techniques revolve around the project resulting to a positive value after it has been

completed as opposed to the project generating a negative value, (Akulu 2011). However, a

significant difference comes about when it comes to the effect of taxation and inflation in

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 23

determining the outcomes of a project. The reason is that such an imposition of taxation and in

the presence of inflation, then the overall costs of operating rises and this is an issue that will

lead to an increase in the costs of operating for the project and this is likely to result to a negative

value generated by the project. The negative value will tend to indicate that the project is not

feasible unless certain measures are undertaken. As an example, and the issue which would apply

in the case of this project, essential and more resources will have to be sought and applied in this

project. The overall operating costs will also have to be reconsideredso that they can be

distributed adequately to ensure the generation of positive value which is essential for declaring

the project to be a feasible one. Apart from the above-mentioned techniques such as net present

value, Return on Investment would also be an essential metric for measuring the feasibility of

this project as emphasized by Greenfield in 2013. It deals with the estimated value that the

project will generate after it has been implemented and executed. The higher the value obtained

from this technique, the more the project will be feasible. Therefore, based on the project

considered in this case, the above techniques have proven that this is a feasible project and which

can allow the attainment of the aims that were intended to be achieved by the project.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 24

Section D: Executive summary

In line with the topic of the project, the project managed to achieve its goals. Specifically, the

problem addressed by this project was carrying out a study on the feasibility of a project in

relation to economics. A project may be feasible or tend not to be and this can only be

determined if at all its feasibility has been examined which may also be done with the application

of technology which influences learning as revealed by Civelek in 2013. In carrying out this

study on the feasibility of a project, essential techniques were used and they are as discussed in

part B of the report. The key stakeholders involved in the project were consultants and

government as well as the researcher among others and they had certain roles to play to ensure

that the project was a success. The project options include trying to look at other projects that

were not feasible and then trying to compare or come up with what led one to be feasible while

the other one was not feasible. There are six techniques that have been applied in the analysis of

the project and their major findings were that the project was highly feasible based on the

dimensions that were being considered in those techniques. The key findings of the project have

certain implications not only on the social but also legal and environmental implications. The

social implication was that such a project is a reflection of all that is happening in the society

especially where the physics education needs to be emphasized and encouraged to continue

developing. The legal implication entails trying to influence any project to be conducted in line

with the prevailing las and regulations as stipulated by the prevailing government. The

environmental implication is a call for the researchers to ensure that their projects are

environmentally friendly. The validity of the findings is also prone to some limitations and some

of them include inaccurate data as well as the human errors when interpreting the results and

findings. The essential recommendations are that the researchers have a responsibility of

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 25

observing all the prevailing ethics or ethical considerations that are associated with a given

project such as privacy, confidentiality of the research and mutual benefit for all involved in a

study.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 26

References

Arik, R. S., and Turkmen, M. (2009). An analysis of articles in Scientific Journals. Published in

the Field of Educational Sciences. The First International Congress of Educational Research,

Canakkale.

Dorothy D., & D., Siraj, S. (2010). Learners’ perceptions of technology for design of a

collaborative m-learning module. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(3), 169-185.

Huseyin Uzunboylu and Gulsum Asiksoy. (August 2014). Research in physics education: A

study of content analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,136 (2014). Pages 425-

437.

DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.353

Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2009).Basic Tendencies in Science and Technology Education. A

Journal of Kastamonu Education, 17(1), 87-102.

Turkmen, L. (2017). The history of development of Turkish elementary teacher education and

the place of science courses in the curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &

Technology Education, 3 (4), 327-341.

Civelek, T., Ucar, E., Gokcol, O.,Ustunel, H., &Umit, I. (2013). The effects of computer-

assisted physics experiment simulations on students' learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational

Sciences, 8 (4), 457-471.

Bauer, M. W. (2003). Classical content analysis: A review. London: Sage Publication.

Greenfield, R. L., Randall, M. R., & Woods, J. C. (2013). Financial leverage and use of the net

present value investment criterion. Financial Management, 40-44.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3665515

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 27

Sell, A. (2012). Planning and evaluation of projects in countries with high inflation rates. Project

Appraisal, 7(1), 11-20.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02688867.1992.9726834

Hartman, J. C., &Schafrick, I. C. (2004). The relevant internal rate of return. The Engineering

Economist, 49(2), 139-158.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00137910490453419

Akalu, M. M. (2011). Re-examining project appraisal and control: developing a focus on wealth

creation. International Journal of Project Management, 19(7), 375-383.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263786300000193

Reutlinger, S. (2010). Techniques for project appraisal under uncertainty. Techniques for project

appraisal under uncertainty., (10).

https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19711804909

Jensen, C., Johansson, S., &Löfström, M. (2006). Project relationships–A model for analyzing

interactional uncertainty. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 4-12.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263786305000724

Anbari, F. T. (2013). Earned value project management method and extensions. Project

management journal, 34(4), 12-23.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/875697280303400403

Zhong, S., & Wang, X. (2011). Improvement and application of earned value analysis in coal

project management. Procedia Engineering, 26, 1983-1989.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMICS 28

Appendix

An image to indicate that there has been an upward trend or increase in physics education even

before between 2008 and 2013.

Source: American Association of Physics Teachers.