project management course project

mohamedabbas77
Mohamed_Abbas.pdf

Project Proposal. BBA222. Project Management. 13537. Rubrics Mohamed_Abbas_Aly_Hegazy

MARKS MARKS

OBTAINED FEEDBACK

Knowledge & Understanding 20% 48,75 Business Strategy (Vision, Mission, Values, Goal, Objectives, Challenges)

5% 75 Good level of understanding and knowledge regarding business strategy concepts.

Project Pre-Assessment and Assessment 5% 40 Poor knowledge and understanding of the project assessment process

Project Charter 10% 40 Some of the concepts regarding project definition, triple constraint and project parameters are not clear.

Application 30% 36,5

Identification of the vision, mission and values of the company. What is its goal and objectives? In your opinion, what are the most important challenges that the company will face short- medium term (in the next 3-4 years)?

5 4 Good application of the concepts of business strategy

At least 10 projects ideas that the company could carry out during a short-medium term (in the next 3-4 years) are proposed. The project ideas are aligned with the strategy of the company and their current and possible future challenges.

5 3,5 Some of the described projects are actually business funcional strategies (e.g. Prioritizing on sales and marketing, Attracting and retaining employees…)

A Project Pre-Assessment has been carried out. 5 from the 10 pre-selected projects are chosen

10 5 Only 5 projects have been analyzed using the pre-assessment.

A Project Assessment has been carried out using a Qualitative Analysis. 1 from the 5 project candidates is chosen

10 0 No Qualitative Analysis has been presented.

PROJECT CONTEXT, DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION 12 8 No project context presented. Good project description and justification

PROJECT STRATEGY (Project Goal, Project Objectives and Critical Success Factors)

10 5 Poor definition of goal, objectives and CSF. Objectives are not SMART

TRIPLE CONSTRAINT: PROJECT SCOPE (Requirements and Deliverables), PROJECT TIME and PROJECT COSTS

18 6 Poor definition of requirements and deliverables. Project Time is clear, but without explaining the most important phases of the project. Project cost is not clear

PROJECT PARAMETERS (Assumptions, Constraints, High- level risks, resources and Stakeholders)

30 5 Poor definition of the project parameters

Critical Thinking 30% 47,5 Business Strategy (Vision, Mission, Values, Goal, Objectives, Challenges)

7,5% 60 Good analysis of the business strategy but without any reliable sources to justify the exposed arguments.

Project Pre-Assessment and Assessment 7,5% 70 Good arguments but lack of reliable sources to support them

Project Charter 15% 30 No sources to justify the project definition. Arguments are weak. At the end, is not clear what will be done, how much is going to cost and what are the most important parameters that need to be considered.

Communication 20% 88,5 Clarity in the communication of ideas 14% 90 Ideas are mostly expressed in a

clear way.

Respect of word count, grammar and spellcheck 2% 90 Very good

Format of the document 2% 90 Very good meeting of the formalities (Cover page, table of contents and bibliography)

Use of reliable sources and references in HRS 2% 75 Good use of reliable sources

FINAL GRADE 53

PROJECT GENERATION & SELECTION

THE PROJECT CHARTER