Nursing week 8_Assignment_DNP855

Module8AssignmentRUBRIC.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >Nursing week 8_Assignment_DNP855

2/16/26, 10:31 AM Preview Rubric: DNP855 Signature Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP855 Sect1 Organizational Leadership and Systems-Based Practice - Aspen University Classroom

DNP855 Signature Assignment Rubric v1

Course: DNP855 Sect1 Organizational Leadership and Systems-Based Practice

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Introduction,

background,

Change Theory,

AIM, Project

Importance, &

Outcomes

Weight: 20%

/ 100

points

(0-69

pts.

)

Introduction, back

ground, change

Theory, AIM, Project

Importance, &

Outcomes not

clearly demon

strated, or are

missing.

points

(70-79

pts.

)

Introduction, back

ground, change

Theory, AIM, Project

Importance, &

Outcomes are

demonstrated

present but missing

key details.

points

pts.

(80-89

)

Introduction, back

ground, change

Theory, AIM, Project

Importance, &

Outcomes are ap

propriate and com

plete showing what

skills are necessary

to lead a team.

points

100

(90-100

)

pts.

Introduction, back

ground, Change

Theory, AIM, Project

Importance, &

Outcomes are thor

ough and expertly

described showing

what skills are nec

essary to lead a

team.

Tools &

Deliverables,

Barriers, &

Challenges, &

Stakeholders Weight: 20%

0 points

(0-69 pts.)

Identification and discussion on anticipated tools and deliverables, major barriers, or challenges.

Identification of key stakeholders, incorporation of interprofessional and multidisciplinary input, and patients’ and families’ perspectives are not clearly demonstrated or are missing.

70 points

(70-79 pts.)

Identification and discussion on anticipated tools and deliverables, major barriers, or challenges.

Identification of key stakeholders, incorporation of interprofessional and multidisciplinary input, patients and families' perspectives are demonstrated but missing some details.

80 points

(80-89 pts.)

Identification and discussion on anticipated tools and deliverables, major barriers, or challenges.

Identification of key stakeholders, incorporation of interprofessional and multidisciplinary input, patients’ and families’ perspectives are appropriate and complete, with all details.

100 points

(90-100 pts.)

Identification and discussion on anticipated tools and deliverables, major barriers, or challenges.

Identification of key stakeholders, incorporation of interprofessional and multidisciplinary input, patients' and families’ perspectives thorough and expertly identified and described.

/ 100

Timeline &

GANTT chart

Weight: 20%

0 points

(0-69 pts.)

Timeline and GANTT chart are not provided.

70 points

(70-79 pts.)

Timeline and GANTT chart are present but missing details.

80 points

(80-89 pts.)

Timeline and GANTT chart are provided and discussed.

100 points

(90-100 pts.)

Timeline and

GANTT chart are clearly and concisely defined, and wellcrafted.

/ 100

Conclusion &

Long-term plans

Weight: 20%

0 points

(0-69 pts.)

Conclusion and long-term plans are not clear or are missing.

70 points

(70-79 pts.)

Conclusion and long-term plans are incorporated, but missing details.

80 points

(80-89 pts.)

Conclusion and long-term plans are incorporated and demonstrated.

100 points

(90-100 pts.)

Conclusion and long-term plans are embraced and expressed, clearly and thoroughly.

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

0 points

(0-34 pts.)

Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

35 points

(35-39 pts.)

Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.

Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

40 points

(40-44 pts.)

Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word

choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

50 points

(45-50 pts.)

Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

/ 50

Total

/ 500

Support Weight:

/ 50

points

pts.

(0-34

)

Lacks support; Uses

poor sources for ref

erences; Citations

lack credibility, rele

vance, or academic

quality or are not

current; Does not

meet the minimum

number of required

citations in assign

ment description.

APA format and

style are not

evident.

points

(35-39

pts.

)

Provides weak sup

port or not enough

support; Citations

are not consistently

credible, current,

relevant or aca

demic; Meets the

minimum number of

required citations in

assignment descrip

tion Missing APA

elements; in-text ci

tations, where nec

essary, are used but

formatted inaccu

rately and not

referenced.

points

pts.

)

(40-44

Provides sufficient

support with credi

ble, current, relevant

academic citations;

Meets the minimum

number of required

citations in assign

ment description. ;

In-text citations and

a reference page are

present with few

format errors.

Mechanics of writ

ing are reflective of

APA style.

points

(45-50

)

pts.

Provides extraordi

narily strong sup

port from credible,

current, relevant,

academic citations;

Meets or exceeds

the minimum num

ber of required cita

tions in assignment

description.

Accurate citations

and references are

presented. No APA

errors are evident.

2/16/26, 10:31 AM Preview Rubric: DNP855 Signature Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP855 Sect1 Organizational Leadership and Systems-Based Practice - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

1/6

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/117064/viewContent/6175221/View 1/6

1/6

Overall Score

Level 1

points minimum

Level 2

350

points minimum

Level 3

400

points minimum

Level 4

500

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/117064/viewContent/6175221/View 1/6

1/6