THE ROLE OF THE NURSE INFORMATICIST IN SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
25 pts
25 pts
25 pts
Develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate- level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:· Planning and requirements definition· Analysis· Design of the new system· Implementation· Post- implementation support
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.
22 to >19.0 pts Good Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts Poor The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
· Analysis· Design of the new system
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.
22 to >19.0 pts Good Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts Poor The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
· Implementation· Post- implementation support
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully
22 to >19.0 pts Good Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is
19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts Poor The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing
Criteria Ratings Pts
10 pts
5 pts
5 pts
developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post- implementation support.
provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post- implementation support.
Resources 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Assignment includes: 3 or more peer- reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.
8 to >7.0 pts Good Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.
7 to >6.0 pts Fair Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.
6 to >0 pts Poor Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
2 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Total Points: 100
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.