CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
Criteria Ratings Pts
40 pts
30 pts
Create a 5- or 6-slide PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:· An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment).· A description of the changes being proposed.· Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.
40 to >35.0 pts Excellent
The narrated presentation accurately and completely presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. ... The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.
35 to >31.0 pts Good
The narrated presentation adequately presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. ... The narrated presentation adequately describes the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.
31 to >27.0 pts Fair
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.
27 to >0 pts Poor
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, and incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary or executive summary is missing. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. ... The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization or justifications are missing.
· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes.· Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes.· Identification of a change management team (by title/role).· A plan for communicating the changes you propose.· A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.
30 to >26.0 pts Excellent
The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. ... The narrated presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management team by title/ role. ... The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. ... The narrated presentation accurately and
26 to >23.0 pts Good
The narrated presentation adequately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. ... The narrated presentation adequately identifies a change management team by title/ role. ... The narrated presentation adequately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. ... The narrated presentation adequately describes recommended risk
23 to >20.0 pts Fair
The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. ... The narrated presentation vaguely or
20 to >0 pts Poor
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes or stakeholders are missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role or change management team is missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed or
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
10 pts
10 pts
thoroughly describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.
mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.
inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.
communication plan is missing. ... The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed or recommendations are missing.
Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources. ... PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource. ... PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources. ... PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.
2 to >0 pts Poor The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used. ... References slide is incomplete or missing.
Presentation Narration 10 to >0.0 pts Excellent Narration is present.
0 pts Fair
0 pts Good
0 pts Poor Narration is missing.
PowerPoint Presentation: The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
10 to >8.0 pts Excellent The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
8 to >7.0 pts Good Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
7 to >6.0 pts Fair Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
6 to >0 pts Poor Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
Total Points: 100
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting —English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.