Milestone 3
Feedback for 6-2 Milestone Three: Methodology, Design, and Data
|
Submission Feedback |
|
|
See rubric for comments and point break down |
|
|
Rubric Name: PSY-790 Milestone Three Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
|
Criteria |
Meets Expectations |
In Progress |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
|
Research Method(s) |
8 points States chosen research method or methods used and whether they are qualitative, quantitative, or both
6.4 points States chosen research method or methods used but errs in determination of type 0 points Does not state chosen research method or methods used and whether they are qualitative, quantitative, or both / 8 |
Criterion Feedback
General methodology approach was very good. See comments in paper regarding any addition of key terms regarding methods.
|
|
7.2 points Discusses why the chosen method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation of the intervention but discussion is unconvincing or there are gaps in logic 0 points Does not discuss why the chosen method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation of the intervention 9 / 9 |
Criterion Feedback
You were off to a good start outlining your approach. You did a nice job of convincing the reader as to why this is a solid and effective approach to help your target population.
|
|
8 points Assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the research design and why it is the best design for the proposed study or evaluation of the intervention but assessment is cursory or there are gaps in logic 0 points Does not assess the strengths and weaknesses of the research design and why it is the best design for the proposed study or evaluation of the intervention 10 / 10 |
Criterion Feedback
You did a nice job of outlining strengths and weaknesses of your approach!
|
|
8 points Selects or develops data-collection tools for the research questions (and research design) but not all tools are valid or reliable or explanation for how validity and reliability will be determined has gaps in logic 0 points Does not select valid and reliable data-collection tools for the research questions (and research design) or develop data-collection tools and explain how validity and reliability will be determined 10 / 10 |
Criterion Feedback
You did a great job of outlining your specific approach of data collection and research methodology.
|
|
0 points Does not support the selection of the population and sampling procedures 8 / 10 |
Criterion Feedback
How will you recruit your subjects? Do you need an IRB? Informed consent?
|
|
8 points Describes the process used to collect data from recruitment to consent to data collection and but does not include ethical considerations and mitigation or description of process is cursory 0 points Does not describe the process used to collect data from recruitment to consent to data collection or include ethical considerations and mitigation 10 / 10 |
|
|
0 / 10 |
Criterion Feedback
A bit more detail needed to outline the data analysis process.--how will you analyze the data that you gather? SPSS would be one example.
|
|
0 / 10 |
Criterion Feedback
Justification would come along with the detail of the analysis.
|
|
8 points Explains the limitations and assumptions connected to the research, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies 0 points Does not explain the limitations and assumptions connected to the research 10 / 10 |
Criterion Feedback
Great job outlining your overall data analysis process, as well as why this is the best approach
|
|
6.4 points Proposes how the findings will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and interested parties, but approach will not be effective for all stakeholders and parties 0 points Does not propose how the findings will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and interested parties 8 / 8 |
Criterion Feedback
Excellent analysis of limitations of your research methodology and approach!
|
|
4 points Submission has minor errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization with room for improvement 0 points Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization 5 / 5 |
Rubric Total Score
Total
70 / 100
Overall Score
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
|
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
35 / 50 - F |
|
|
Feedback Date |
|
|
Sep 29, 2019 1:28 PM |
|
Assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
6-2 Milestone Three: Methodology, Design, and Data |
|
|
|
|
|
Submission(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
Submission(s) Turnitin® Similarity Inline Feedback Date Submitted |
|
|
|
|
Submission(s) |
Turnitin® Similarity |
Inline Feedback |
Date Submitted |
|
|
Milestone 3.docx (16.73 KB) |
22 % Similar |
View Turnitin® GradeMark® |
Sep 21, 2019 2:35 PM |
|
22 % |
|