9-3 neuropsychology
Discussion Rubric: Graduate Activity: 3-1 Discussion: Final Project Milestone One: Topic Submission
Course: PSY-634-10852-M01 Cognitive Neuropsychology 2024 D-3 (Jul - Oct)
Name: Sule Umit
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Comprehension 20 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Good work providing a thoughtful discussion of your final paper topic.
Timeliness 10 / 10
20 points
Develops an initial
post with an
organized, clear point
of view or idea using
rich and significant
detail
18 points
Develops an initial
post with a point of
view or idea using
appropriate detail
14 points
Develops an initial
post with a point of
view or idea but with
some gaps in
organization and
detail
0 points
Does not develop an
initial post with an
organized point of
view or idea
0 points
N/A
This level is not
applicable for
grading of this
criterion.
10 points
Submits initial post
on time
7 points
Submits initial post
one day late
0 points
Submits initial post
two or more days late
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Criterion Feedback
Good work posting by due dates.
Engagement 20 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Good work providing reply posts.
Critical Thinking 30 / 30
Criterion Feedback
Good work providing support from references.
20 points
Provides relevant and
meaningful response
posts with clarifying
explanation and
detail
18 points
Provides relevant
response posts with
some explanation and
detail
14 points
Provides somewhat
relevant response
posts with some
explanation and
detail
0 points
Provides response
posts that are generic
with little explanation
or detail
30 points
Draws insightful
conclusions that are
thoroughly defended
with evidence and
examples
27 points
Draws informed
conclusions that are
justified with
evidence
21 points
Draws logical
conclusions
0 points
Does not draw logical
conclusions
Total 100 / 100
Overall Score
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Writing (Mechanics) 20 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Well-written overall.
20 points
Initial post and
responses are easily
understood, clear,
and concise using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with no
errors in citations
18 points
Initial post and
responses are easily
understood using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with few
errors in citations
14 points
Initial post and
responses are
understandable using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with a
number of errors in
citations
0 points
Initial post and
responses are not
understandable and
do not use proper
citation methods
where applicable
Exemplary Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.
Proficient
Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.
Needs Improvement
Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.
Not Evident
Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.