Burnout in Mental Health Nurses, How to protect this vital workforce
RMIT University Alistair Ross 05/04/2020 Page 1
NURS2098 ONLINE TUTORIAL PRESENTATION FEEDBACK SHEET:
Student Name & Topic:
Criteria Possible Mark
Actual Mark
Section Comments:
Introduction to topic including objectives/purpose of the presentation. 1. 1. Discusses relevance of topic to contemporary mental health nursing.
OR 2. Discusses 1-2 pieces of literature related to the topic and to contemporary mental health nursing. Consider:
- Relevance to clinical interventions in practice. - Relevance to professional practice. - Relevance to reflectiveness in practice. - Relevance to broader education in practice. - Relevance to mental health promotion in practice.
8.
Utilises clear strategies to engage the tutorial group during the Presentation.
2.
Makes effective use of handouts to support the Presentation. 1. Makes effective of time in your Presentation. 1. Questions and answer section of the Presentation effectively lead / managed.
2.
Use of creativity in the Presentation. 1. Bibliography provided in APA format. 4.
Total 20 .
Assessors Comments:
RMIT University Alistair Ross 05/04/2020 Page 2
TUTORIAL PRESENTATION MARKING RUBRIC.
Assessment Criteria
Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction
Introduction [1]
Your Introduction Recording / Slides are illogical and disorganised. They did not reflect the topic at all, nor did it provided adequate detail about the presenter or the objectives or purpose of the presentation [0]
Your Introduction Recording / Slides are reasonably well organised. They reflected the topic however it did not provide adequate detail about the objectives or purpose of the presentation [0.5]
Your Introduction Recording / Slides are very welll organised. They included the presenter details and reflected the topic as well as provide excellent detail regarding the objectives or purpose of the presentation [1]
OPTION 1: Discusses relevance of topic to contemporary mental health nursing (8)
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are unrealistic, unrelated and ambiguous and does not focus adequately on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is superficial and lacks the necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally lacks relevance to practice. [0-3]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are barely realistic, poorly related and ambiguous and only focuses to a basic standard on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is superficial and contains the minimum necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally has only limited relevance to practice. [4]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are reasonably realistic, relating well to the topic and include a good standard of detail on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is sound and contains a good level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is well considered and has reasonable relevance to practice. [5]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are highly realistic, relating very well to the topic and include a very good standard of detail on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is well constructed and contains a very good level of depth and complexity whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is very well done with a high level of relevance to practice. [6]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are exceptionally realistic and accurate, relating very well to the topic and include an excellent standard of detail. The exploration of the topic itself is extremely well constructed and contains an outstanding level of depth and complexity whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is outstanding with a high level of relevance to practice. [7-8]
OR Your Presentation Recording / Slides are unrealistic, unrelated and ambiguous and does not focus adequately on your chosen 1-2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is superficial and lacks the necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally lacks relevance to practice. [0-3]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are barely realistic, poorly related and ambiguous and only focuses to a basic standard on your chosen 1-2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is superficial and contains the minimum necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally has only limited relevance to practice. [4]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are reasonably realistic, relating well to the topic and focuses to a good standard of detail on your chosen 1-2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is sound and contains a good level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is well considered and has reasonable relevance to practice. [5]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are highly realistic, relating very well to the topic and focuses to a very good standard of detail on your chosen 1-2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic.. The exploration of the literature itself is well constructed and contains a very good level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is very well done with a high level of relevance to practice. [6]
Your Presentation Recording / Slides are exceptionally realistic and accurate, relating very well to the topic and focuses to an excellent standard of detail your chosen 1-2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is extremely well constructed and contains an outstanding level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is outstanding with a high level of relevance to practice. [7-8]
OPTION 2: Discusses relevance of 1-2 pieces of literature to contemporary mental health nursing (8)
Utilises clear strategies to engage the tutorial group [2]
Presentation content mostly read out verbatim from the Slides with little or no attempt to engage the tutorial group through ablid commentary or discussion around visual elements during the Video Presentation. No significant attempt at strategies to promote audience engagement evident during the presentation. [0- 0.5].
Large sections of the Presentation content read out verbatim from the Slides with minimal attempt to engage the tutorial group through ablid commentary or discussion around visual elements during the presentation. Limited attempt at strategies to promote audience engagement evident during the presentation. [1].
Large sections of the Presentation deliverd in the form of short sections of content read out from slides with significant ablid commentary or discussion around visual elements evident during the presentation. Very good attempt at strategies to promote audience engagement evident throughout the presentation. [1.5].
Overwhelming majority of the Presentation deliverd in the form of short sections of content read out from slides with significant adlib verbal expansion and discussion supported by extensive attempts to engage the tutorial group evident during the presentation. Excellent use of strategies to promote audience engagement evident during the presentation. [2].
RMIT University Alistair Ross 05/04/2020 Page 3
Makes effective use of handouts to support the Presentation: [1]
No handouts provided in support of the Presentation. [0]
Basic quality Slides provided with text only in support of the presentation. This may include generic information relevant to the topic obtained from external sources (i.e. information flyers). Limited reference to the Slides during your presentation to support your discussion. [0.5]
Excellent quality Slides provided in support of the presentation. This will include information relevant to the topic obtained from external sources and combined into a handout specific to your presentation topic supported with Images / Diagrams. Extensive references to the Slides during your presentation to support your discussion. [1]
Makes effective of time in your Presentation. [1]
Presentation section less than 5 minutes duration. [0.5]
Presentation section 5-9 minutes duration. [0.5]
Presentation section 9-10 minutes duration. [1]
Questions and answer section of the Presentation effectively lead / managed [2]
No Questions provided for the online Q&A activity resulting in no meaningful Online discussion relating to the topic. [0]
Only Two basic questions presented that are adapt reasonably well to writing 50 words on, resulting in reasonable responses / discussion relating to the topic. [1]
2 well considered questions with some reflectiive questions / summary points integrated through the presentation (on slides and in discussion) resulting in detailed responses to the questions. [1.5]
2 oputstanding questions with enegaging & reflectiive questions / summary points integrated through the presentation (on slides and in discussion) resulting in robust meaningful responses to the questions. [2]
Use of creativity in the Presentation [1]:
Video Presentation delivered in a didactic type video presentation style with no evidence of creativity (beyond basic strategies to engage the tutorial group as listed above) noted during the presentation. [0]
Video Presentation primarily delivered in a didactic type style with some evidence of / attempt at creativity (beyond basic strategies to engage the tutorial group as listed above) noted during the presentation. [0.5]
Video Presentation delivered in a creative and imaginative style (well beyond basic strategies to engage the tutorial group as listed above) with substantial creativity / creative elements evident. [1]
Bibliography provided in APA format [4]:
Very poor standard of referencing. Consistent errors in APA referencing style / format. Inadequate use of literature to support your presentation. Bibliography not provided as part of your notes for the Tutor to access / read to presenting. [0-1]
You have provided the minimum level of literature required to support your presentation. Some errors in APA referencing style / format. Bibliography provided as part of your notes for the Tutor to access / read to presenting prior to viewing your Presentation. [2]
You have provided a sound level of literature required to support your presentation. Good poor standard of referencing overall. Bibliography provided as part of your notes for the Tutor to access / read to presenting prior to viewing your Presentation. [2.5]
You have provided a good level of literature required to support your presentation. Very good poor standard of referencing overall. Bibliography provided as part of your notes for the Tutor to access / read to presenting prior to viewing your Presentation. [3]
You have provided an excellent of literature beyond what was required to support your presentation. Excellent standard of referencing overall. Bibliography provided as part of your notes for the Tutor to access / read to presenting prior to viewing your Presentation. [4]