w6 final
Running head: ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 1
Ashford General Hospital: Analysis and Proposal
Student Name
MHA 601 Principles of Health Care
March 25, 2017
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 2
Ashford General Hospital: Analysis and Proposal
Executive Summary
Ashford General Hospital, like many other hospitals across the United States and
globally, face the ever-increasing reality of one of the worst nursing shortage to date. Ashford
General Hospital struggles with nursing shortages rising, due to an aging nursing staff that is
rapidly approaching retirement age; whereas, other portions of nursing staff are hard to retain
due to high levels of emotional and physical burnout. Other causes of nursing shortage include
higher patient to nurse ratios, lack of nursing pools to draw from, and slow growth in nursing pay
scales. Many hospital administrators have referred to the nursing shortage as a major crisis,
which has negative effects on quality patient care.
This analysis examines trends in nurse training, staffing, and wages. The primary focus
will be on hospital employment of the bedside nurses, since more than two-thirds of registered
nurses work in hospital settings. In particular, this analysis examines how wages and work
conditions are fueling nursing shortages across the country; this affects the ability of hospitals to
meet staffing needs. In addition, the analysis will also examine solutions that five hospital have
put into practice in the effort to rectify their own nursing shortages.
In addition to the aforementioned analysis, two viable solutions are provided, which
Ashford General Hospital can put into action within a two-year-time-frame. The aforementioned
solutions will include two stakeholder group analyses. The stakeholder analyses will include a
review of the financial impact, human resources issues, interpersonal dynamics of the hospital
personnel, cultural concerns, and change management issues. This analysis and proposal will
conclude with final analysis of solutions that will assist Ashford University in its quest to rectify
its nursing shortage, and recommendations as to which solution is best for Ashford General.
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 3
Ashford General Hospital Background
Ashford General Hospital has been a major partner in in healthcare, serving its local
community in California for greater than a half century. Hospital services include twenty-four
hour emergency care, and an urgent care clinic that has extended hours of service (“Ashford
General”). Ashford General Hospital’s nursing employment statistics provided, posited that
“Sixty-eight percent of nursing staff is forty-five years of age or older, and its nurses retention
rate is sixty-one percent compared to the nationwide level of sixty-five percent” (“Ashford
General”).
According to the Ashford General Hospital study, staff nurses are experiencing high
levels of physical and emotional burnout, resulting in medical leaves and turnover. (“Ashford
General”). Ashford General has had to utilize “per-diem nurses and traveling nurses, which have
resulted in lowered patient satisfaction, and an increase in personal costs” (“Ashford General”).
The goal at this point in the analysis is to review and discuss solutions that other hospitals have
used to address similar problems in regards to nursing shortages.
Nursing Shortages: Five Hospitals with Workable Solutions
Like most hospitals across the nation and globally, Columbus Regional Healthcare
System has experienced a scarcity in nursing applicants; however, the main problem that
Columbus Regional had was its slow human resource processing of applicants. Columbus
Regional implemented a process in which it could process nursing applicants in fifty percent of
the time it once took to do so. Columbus Regional’s human resource department was provided
by leadership, “…more autonomy to make contingent offers to promising candidates and
interview nurses on the spot” (Management Solutions, 2005, p. 2).
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 4
In addition, Columbus Regional has improved the application process by using an
“automated application system, which saves time and money” (Management Solutions, 2005, p.
2). The aforementioned process allows Columbus Regional to focus in on candidates faster than
its localized competitors. There is still work to accomplish in the effort to realize better and
faster recruitment, but Columbus Regional is on the right tract where overcoming nursing
shortage is concerned.
Emory Healthcare “is a university-based health care system comprising seven entities
[six hospitals and one clinic]; all located in Atlanta, GA, area” (Adams, Kaplow, Dominy,
Stroud, 2015. p. 52). Emory Healthcare faced a great challenge because of the enormous task of
staffing several health care systems. The nursing shortage was taking a great toll on Emory
Healthcare’s profits due to an inadequate staffing system, which did nothing to overcome the
severe nursing shortage that plagued the organization. Emory did have an internal float pool;
however, Adams et al, argued that an “internal float pool was not efficient” (p. 53).
An internal float pool was not efficient due to “poor reporting, and having different cost
centers to deal with; therefore, the alternative was an internal nursing agency, which reduced
costs and maximized utilization of nursing resources” (Adams et al, 2015, p. 53). The new
internal nursing agency system allowed Emory Healthcare to better utilize their staff in all areas
of the system. Having its own nursing agency allowed Emory Healthcare to staff their facilities
with nurses who were company trained in the areas of Emory Healthcare’s internal policies and
procedures; thereby reducing errors and staffing costs at the same time.
At Spartanburg Regional Medical Center in the Greenville, South Carolina, an “…online
shift auction akin to eBay for nursing shifts, which is a staffing model used in other fields, such
as the airline industry” (May, Bazzoll, & Gerland, 2006, p. 317), is used to combat nursing
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 5
shortages. The bid system allows nurses whom wish to work overtime to do so, which is more
cost effective than using nursing agencies to fill the shifts that are open. May et al, noted that
“Hospitals also achieve greater confidence in the quality of nursing care because internal
pools often rely on nurses currently on staff who are seeking additional shifts or previously
employed nurses who desire fewer hours or more flexibility” (p. 317).
May et al, (2006) posited that many hospitals use flexible schedules to overcome nursing
shortages; the Cleveland Clinic is one of those hospitals that utilize this type of system.
Cleveland Clinic’s flexible schedule staffing program includes “two-hour parent shifts for nurses
with obligations that limit their availability to work long hours” (May et al, 2006, p. 319). May
et al, also wrote, “This strategy has allowed units to bring in an extra nurse during particularly
busy periods and has attracted a number of nurses back to the field” (p. 319).
Cleveland Clinic and many other hospitals have been investing more money into training
nurses. Training nurses included investing in new nursing schools, and the hiring of new nurse
graduates. Flexibility is one of the main factors that aids Cleveland Clinic in working towards
better staffing ratios, while also attracting new staff to work at their facilities.
In response to the severe nursing shortage crisis, Children’s National Medical Center
(CNMC) initiated a “one-hundred day nurse recruitment and retention plan” (Robinson &
Pinkerton, 2004, p. 91). CNMC’s recruitment plan included, “increasing part-time options,
weekend pay incentives, increased educational incentives such as tuition reimbursement,
expansion of its recognition program, and increasing pay in order to be competitive in the health
care market” (Robinson & Pinkerton, 2004, p. 91). The aforementioned recruitment plan
resulted in positive and effective outcomes.
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 6
CNMC experienced many internal adjustments over the one-hundred day recruitment
plan process. Accommodating training groups and limiting overtime of CNMC’s present staff
created challenges; however, with any change management program, challenges will arise, which
requires re-evaluation strategies, and a reinforcement of goals. What CNMC did in the process
was to create both systematic change and systemic change within its staffing process, and its
organizational culture. Frates (2014) hypothesized that “Systemic change involves altering
organizational beliefs and thought processes; whereas, systemic change entails the recognition of
the interrelationship and interdependencies within the system and its subsystems and the
embedment of the system in its environment [Carr, 1997], (Chapter 10, Section 5).
In the five hospitals that were reviewed and used as subjects for this analysis, the main
focus was the “need to change” (Frates, 2014, Chapter 10, Section 3) that which was not
effective in overcoming the challenge of a nursing shortage crisis. Each of the five hospitals had
to perform certain actions in order to realize positive change and goal accomplishment. Frates
hypothesized that there are basic strategies that help to accommodate change; however, there is
one strategy that encompasses the actions of the five aforementioned hospitals applies the most.
Frates stressed the importance of empowering action by “Providing staff with necessary
resources to support the change, eliminate hindrances, and allow for productive feedback while
acknowledging and recompensing efforts and accomplishments” (“Theory in Action,” 2014,
Chapter 10, Section 3). That said, there are key findings that ranged across all hospitals that
would be of most value to Ashford General Hospital’s quest to adopt strategies that will help the
organization overcome its personal nursing shortage.
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 7
Key Findings
Nursing shortage solutions require a team effort. Hospital leadership, human resource
staff, nursing and physician staffs are all valuable sources for creating innovative solutions in the
goal of enhancing the nursing staff. Cost effective ways to recruit nurses is to utilize internal
staff float pools, invest in nursing schools, provide in-hospital training programs for student
nurses, and adapt schedules by being flexible. In addition to the aforementioned strategies,
utilizing online application processes helps to provide faster responses, and saves money and
time. The next portion of this analysis and proposal is to provide two viable solutions that
Ashford General Hospital can implement within the next two years.
Two Viable Solutions
Ashford General Hospital can implement two solutions over the next two years that will
enhance its ability to work towards the goal of increasing the nursing staff. The first solution
would be to create a specific goal with a specific date in mind. For instance, the hospital could
start by initiating a program that allows student nurses to attain their clinical experience at the
hospital. Student nurses will be able to work and train with an experienced nurse, which is two-
fold in its purpose; it provides the nursing student personal hands on experience, and it helps the
training nurse to have someone to assist them with their nursing duties. That said, it also allows
experienced nurses to share and pass on their knowledge. In addition, it provides an opportunity
for the hospital to offer student nurses job opportunities post-graduation.
The second solution is to offer flexible scheduling to nurses that want to return to work,
but only wish to work part-time or per-diem shifts. Flexibility includes re-evaluating pay scales
to compete in an open health care market, not just locally, but at a national level. Within the
scope of flexibility is the idea of recruiting by providing hospital staff from other departments
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 8
within the hospital, incentives to become a nurse, such as offering tuition reimbursement and
sign-on bonuses. Lastly, to add to the two aforementioned solutions; it would be a good idea to
offer Ashford Hospital staff members a referral fee for the referral of any registered nurse,
which results in the hiring of a nurse(s). The next step in this analyses and proposal, is to
provide two stakeholder groups analyses for the two aforementioned solutions..
Stakeholder Group Analyses Based on First Solution
Different stakeholders influence the decision-making process within the healthcare
organization. Each stakeholder group has its own concerns and agendas where problem solving
is concerned within the health care environment. The stakeholder groups that are affected by
nursing shortages are owners, stockholders, organizational leaders, human resources, nursing
staff, ancillary staff, customers, and the community that utilizes health care facilities for their
health care. That said, the first solution to the nursing shortage at Ashford General Hospital
would impact many stakeholder groups, which include: owners, shareholders, leaders, human
resources, physician staff members, and nursing staff; however, the stakeholder group most
impacted would be the internal stakeholders, such as executive leadership, mangers, nursing staff
members, employees and patients. Lastly, the nursing school, instructors, and nursing students
would be impacted on a different level.
Executives would have to get the approval of owners and/or shareholders in order to
implement a nursing training program. Once approved, the executives would have to conduct
group meetings to decide on the specific goal and a specific timeframe for each process that the
hospital needs to implement in order to start the nursing recruitment process. The next step
would be for the executives to conduct a group meeting with managers and human resources
staff. Policies for allowing nursing students to train within the acute care setting will need to be
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 9
developed. Human resource would need to be able to conduct background checks, and collect
personal information on the nursing students before allowing them to train within an acute care
setting with live patients.
Training modules for staff nurses whom will be buddying up with students, will also have
to be created to use as protocols for all actions of student nurses. When nursing students
participate in hospital clinical experiences, nursing instructors also attend to oversee the training
process, to guide students’ actions, and to answer student questions. Thus, nursing staff
members need to learn how to evaluate student performance in a professional and helpful
manner, and to communicate effectively by providing feedback to both the student and nursing
instructors.
There is the minimal issue of costs to the hospital in the form of liability insurance. The
actual cost for allowing student nurses to perform studies in a clinical setting is minimal as it is
limited to the background checks and any liability insurance coverage, which can be linked to the
hospital’s currant liability coverage. Nursing students preform duties without pay, and the
hospital does not provide health insurance; therefore, no costs are incurred in these areas.
Although registered nurses are helping to train students, the students provides help with baths,
feeding, bed changes, passing medicines, along with other helpful duties , which provides help
for the training staff nurses.
There are always ethical, legal, and diversity risk factors involved in the process of
training the student nurses. Ashford General can implement a specific orientation for student
nurses, which can cover ethical, legal, and diversity risk factors. These types of orientations are
conducted twice a year, since nursing hospital clinical training is conducted over two semesters
per year. This type or program helps to instill ethical and legal practices in student nurses.
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 10
Within hospital student nursing orientations, the hospital can provide legal policies, such
as patient privacy and discrimination laws, internal ethical policies and practices, and specific
guidelines as to what the student nurses is allowed to do and not to do while conducting clinical
studies within the hospital environment. The aforementioned process is similar to regular
hospital employment orientations; however, the orientation program can be designed within a
limited scope of practice. Legal issues can also be limited by training the nursing staff to oversee
students properly. The next stakeholder analysis is slightly different.
Stakeholder Group Analyses Based on Second Solution
Stakeholders involved in the second solution to the nursing shortage at Ashford General
Hospital include owners, shareholders, executives, human resource staff, managers, nursing staff,
and patients and their families. If Ashford hospital were to adopt a flexible scheduling solution,
it would require the stakeholders to weigh the benefits and costs. Owner and shareholders would
have to agree that it is in the best interest of the hospital to provide the nursing staff more
flexibility, in order for the hospital to provide better nursing staff coverage. This solution makes
a lot of sense, and is adaptable to the needs of the hospital. The executives would have to
determine how flexibility fits into the hospital’s overall financial goals and patient care goals.
Nursing pay scales would have to be re-evaluated to be competitive in the area of part-
time and per-diem employment status. Hospital staffing policies would need to be revised to
reflect call-in or call-off priorities, in the event of patient census changes. Hospital employee
benefits would have to be reevaluated to include flexible staffing; meaning health and life
insurances, and employee earned vacation hours. Nursing managers would have to be creative
when scheduling nurses who would want to split shifts, or work around family needs. In order to
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 11
attract more nurses, the hospital would have to implement a tuition reimbursement program for
exiting non-nursing employees whom wish to attend nursing school.
In addition to the aforementioned flexibility programs, the hospital’s executives and
human resource director should implement a registered nurse referral bonus program. The
employee whom refers the nurse, would get a referral fee if the referred nurse were hired by the
hospital. The hospital can offer a sign-on bonus program to any nurse that is hired. The sign-on
program has a specific dollar value, but comes with the stipulation that the hired nurse must
contract to work for the hospital for a specific amount of years. The sign-on bonus incentive
does contain upfront costs, but it limits cost by limiting turnover of nurses. Nursing turnover is
limited the more time that the nurse invests in working for the hospital. In addition, when nurses
form friendships with other staff members, and adapts to the hospital’s culture, there is a higher
probability of retaining the nurse, all which helps reduce turnover costs.
Robinson and Pinkerton (2004) argued that, “The focus on limiting cost by decreasing
turnover rates and increasing nursing productivity has been the driving force; in addition, to the
cost of replacing a nurse, quality of care is also affected by nursing turnover” (p. 958). That said,
the aforementioned flexibility process are the most ethical, legal, and diverse options that
hospital stakeholders can consider when searching for solutions to nursing shortages.
Flexibility attracts nurses who need to have positions that allow them to still participate in
personal lives, while at the same time limiting burnout and stress related turnover. Flexibility
lowers legal liability because there is more staff to care for the patients. Lastly, flexibility
provides an opportunity for healthy organizational culture diversity. These are positive, rather
than negative, attributes to consider. After review of the two solutions, the question that remains
is, which solution would best suit Ashford General Hospital?
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 12
Best Solution Recommended for Ashford General Hospital Nursing Shortage
The best scenario would be to implement the first aforementioned solution within the first
year, and then the second aforementioned solution within the following year. Both solutions are
valuable in combating nursing shortages, while proving to be cost effective. The first solution
offers an opportunity to train future nurses, which also provides the hospital with a good way to
provide hands-on assistance for the nursing staff during the times that student nurses are training
at the hospital. In addition, it provides Ashford General Hospital with the opportunity to recruit
new nurses from the pool of nursing students. New nursing graduates typically are offered
nursing position at hospitals, at the lower level of nursing pay scales. Having student nurses
does not cause a drastic cultural shift, as all nurses were students once; therefore, nurse tend to
enjoy the added help and the opportunity to pass on valuable experience. The second solution
would require a bit more change management.
Macphee and Suryaprakash (2012) wrote that the implications of nursing management, is
that “Constant change is a global reality” (p. 249). Implementing change within Ashford
General Hospital, where flexible staffing is concerned, is a mandatory undertaking. Hospitals
must be creative and flexible in creating new ways to attract and keep nursing staff. Flexible
nursing will take additional steps, new policies, additional costs, and organizational change, but
it will be worth the patient satisfaction. Flexible nursing programs create the ability to have
sufficient staff, which limits negative outcomes seen in nurses whom are overworked,
emotionally and physically burned out, while at the same time reducing turnover. The Human
Resource department will have more work to do, but they will also meet recruiting ratios easier,
which limits the constant stress of trying to find nurses to apply for open positions. Flexibility
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 13
drives down legal liability, because there is more staff to care for patients. Spacing out the
changes over a period of months to a year, allows staff members to adapt to change.
The aforementioned changes will require transformational leadership. Shermerhorn,
Hunt, Osborn, and Uhl-Bien (2010) wrote, “…transformational leadership occurs when leaders
broaden and elevate their followers’ interests, when they generate awareness and acceptance of
the group’s purposes and mission, and when they stir their followers to look beyond their own
self-interests to the good of others” (p. 324).
In the case of Ashford General Hospital, leaders must rise to the occasion to lead and
guide their staff into changes that will ultimately better the care of patients, provide adequate
staffing, and reduce the probability of staff turnover. In doing so, the hospital will effectively
reduce costs and legal liabilities, reach organizational goals, and prepare for the future. In the
end, it is diversity, which can promote a competitive advantage. Jones and George (2007)
reflected on diversity as an “approach that reflects the needs of its employees, customers, and
environment (p. 31). That said, Ashford Hospital should not hesitate to implement these
changes, rather it should begin now, so that it can insure its future adaptability to constant health
care changes.
In conclusion, the analysis of Ashford General Hospital provided great insight into the
nursing shortage crisis that not only affects Ashford General, but also hospitals across the globe.
The analysis provided identifiable reasons for the nursing shortage. The analysis of five separate
hospitals solutions for addressing nursing shortages provides valuable ways in which Ashford
General Hospital can overcome its own nursing shortage issues. This analysis provides two
solutions for Ashford General Hospital to utilize in the process of recruiting new nursing staff
members. Lastly, recommendations extrapolated from the solutions given, proved to be the best
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 14
course of action that would best serve Ashford General Hospital’s immediate staffing needs and
future goals. In the end, “an organization that invests in the education of its employees is
investing in human capital” (Clark & Allison-Jones, 2011, p. 18). That said, investing in nursing
students provides the means to address Ashford General Hospital nursing shortage.
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 15
References
Adams, J., Kaplow, R., Dominy, J., & Stroud, B. (2015) Beyond a Band-Aid approach: An
internal agency solution to nurse staffing. Nursing Economics, 33(1), 51-58.
Ashford General Hospital Proposal (n.d.). Ashford 7: Week 6 –final paper. Retrieved from,
Ashford University: Student Portal.
Clark, R. C., & Allison-Jones, L. (2011). Investing in human capital: an academic-service
partnership to address the nursing shortage. Nursing Education Perspectives, (1), 18.
Frates, J. (2014). Health care management: Theory in action. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.: San
Diego, CA.
Jones, G. & George, J. (2007). Essentials of contemporary management. (2nd ed.). Boston Burr
Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill
Macphee, M., & Suryaprakash, N. (2012). First-line nurse leaders' health-care change
management initiatives. Journal Of Nursing Management, 20(2), 249-259.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01338.x
Management Solutions or Combating Workforce Shortage. (2005). HFM (Healthcare Financial
Management), 59(1), 1.
May, J. H., Bazzoll, G. J., & Gerland, A. M. (2006). Hospitals' responses to nurse staffing
shortages. Health Affairs, 25W316-W323. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.w316
Mitchell, M. B. (1994). The effect of work role values on job satisfaction. Journal Of Advanced
Nursing, 20(5), 958-963. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20050958.x
Robinson, N. C., & Pinkerton, S. (2004). The Children's National Medical Center story: Nursing
shortage to employer of choice. Nursing Economics, 22(2), 91-93.
ASHFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL 16
Schermerhorn, J., Hunt, J., Osborn, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2010). Organizational behavior. (11th
ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Spence Laschinger, H. K., Leiter, M., Day, A., & Gilin, D. (2009). Workplace empowerment,
incivility, and burnout: impact on staff nurse recruitment and retention outcomes. Journal
Of Nursing Management, 17(3), 302-311. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00999.x