hdhd

Amberton University MGT 6175 – Management Responsibility and Practice

Graduate Paper

Instructions: This assignment is a written paper based upon current scholarly literature in the area of management responsibility and practice. The specific focus of the paper should be on one of the following two topics: 1) motivation, OR 2) team leadership. The paper will be twelve written pages in length and constructed as a literature review per the current APA Manual (6th edition). The paper will include a title page (per APA format), which will not count as a one of the twelve required pages. The paper should use the format below for headings and written in paragraph form. The paper should be free of grammatical and spelling errors and exhibit quality written scholarship commensurate with graduate standards. A minimum of 15 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources should be used in the paper. The final section of the literature review should make recommendations for future research based upon your explication of the literature. Please make solid recommendations that are fully supported by logical rationale. Criteria

Unacceptable = 5 point per box

Acceptable = 15 points per box

Excellent = 20 points per box

Clarity, Completeness, and timely

Topic, purpose, issue or claim is not clearly stated or supported.

Claim is vaguely stated and minimally supported. Paper not well organized/confusing.

Clearly states issue/ argument and supports with adequate information. Paper is well organized.

Significance and Relevancy

Ideas, facts or points are not relevant to the issue/purpose/claim

Some points are relevant to the issue/claim

All points presented relevant and connected to the issue at hand/ purpose/claim.

Accuracy, Precision, and Meaning

Details and meaning are absent, vague, or ambiguous

Some precision is used; details marginally convey meaning of purpose

Adequately conveyed meaning of claim and exhibited full comprehension of topic

APA Usage

APA standards are not met

APA standards are correct in much of the paper, although numerous errors were made

APA standards are met flawlessly

Future Recommendations

A recommendation for future research is not made

A recommendation is weakly made and largely unsupported

A clear recommendation is made and well supported