GOVERNANCE

Goal and Objective 1.1: Professional Writing Assessment Form (MBA)

TR UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE EXEMPLARY

Executive

Summary

Topic, organizational

issues, and recommendations not

presented in a clear, concise, and

informative manner.

Topic, organizational issues, and

recommendations presented but with minor deficiencies in clarity,

conciseness, or content.

Topic, organizational issues, and

recommendations presented clearly, concisely, and in an informative manner.

Introduction

Fails to engage and/or provide the reader with a clear map of the organizational structure

of the manuscript.

Moderately engages the reader and provides a clear map to the organizational structure of the manuscript.

Engages the reader and provides a clear map to the organizational structure of the manuscript.

Background

Provides limited

overview and background information

of the relevant literature.

Provides adequate overview and

background information of relevant literature.

Provides extensive overview and

background information of relevant literature.

Analysis of Issue

Analysis is incomplete and/or does not apply

appropriate theories/concepts/meth ods.

Provides analysis of chosen issue using most of the appropriate

theories/concepts/methods.

Thorough analysis of chosen issue using appropriate theories/concepts/

methods.

Recommendat ions

Recommendations encompass less than

four of the following five characteristics:

relevant, feasible, high quality, considers

limitations, and based

on solid theoretical foundation.

Recommendations encompass four of the following five characteristics:

relevant, feasible, high quality, considers limitations, and based on

solid theoretical foundation.

Recommendations are relevant, feasible, high quality, considers limitations, and

based on solid theoretical foundation.

Conclusion

Fails to summarize results and clearly convince reader recommendations are valid.

Summarizes results and convinces reader recommendations are valid.

Summarizes results and reinforces validity of recommendations.

References Incomplete with multiple errors.

Complete with minor errors. Complete and accurate.

Style

Structure is not easy to

follow and significant errors with respect to writing fundamentals.

Structure is easy to follow with

minor spelling, typographical, and/or grammatical errors.

Structure is easy to follow with no

spelling, typographical, and/or grammatical errors.

Goal and Objective 3.1: Business Ethics Assessment Form (MBA)

TRAIT UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE EXEMPLARY Detection

Little or no recognition

of the ethical issue and unable to ascertain what

must be decided.

Demonstrates ability to

recognize the ethical issue and ascertains what must be

decided.

Demonstrates ability to describe

the ethical issue in detail and ascertains exactly what must be

decided.

Considers Stakeholders

Inability to describe the legitimate rights and

responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

within business activities.

Demonstrates ability to use one or more ethical frameworks in

describing the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple

stakeholders within business activities.

Demonstrates ability to compare and contrast multiple ethical frameworks in describing the

legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple

stakeholders within business activities.

Chooses an Action Has difficulty identifying

appropriate course of action among

alternatives. No integration of actions

across multiple stakeholders.

Formulates an appropriate plan

of action that partially integrates multiple stakeholder

considerations in the analysis.

Formulates an appropriate plan of

action reflecting the benefits and risks of action and fully integrates

multiple stakeholder considerations in the analysis.

Goal and Objective 4.1: Decision Making Assessment Form (MBA)

TRAIT UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE EXEMPLARY

Identifies Alternatives

Identifies some relevant alternatives but

understanding of the situation is limited.

Identifies relevant alternatives consistent

with a basic understanding of the

situation.

Identifies relevant alternatives consistent with an in-depth

understanding of the situation.

Appropriateness

Does not employ appropriate models, techniques, theory, and evaluation criteria.

Integrates appropriate models, techniques, theories, and evaluation criteria.

Integrates the most appropriate models, techniques, theories, and evaluation criteria.

Interpretation Misinterprets multiple managerial issues.

Demonstrates limited

ability to estimate outcomes from

alternative decision options.

Correctly interprets most managerial issues.

Demonstrates ability to

estimate outcomes from alternative decision

options.

Correctly interprets all managerial issues. Demonstrates strong ability to

estimate outcomes from alternative

decision options.