| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| EDU-470 | EDU-470-O500 | Math Technology Presentation | 60.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (65.00%) | Approaching (75.00%) | Acceptable (85.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Content [ACEI 2.3, 3.1, 3.2; InTASC 2(b), 2(h), 4(g), 5(c), 8(g), 8(n), 8(o), 9(f), 10(e), 10(f); ISTE-T 1(a), 1(d), 2(a),2(b), 2(c), 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), 5(d)] | 40.0% | Not addressed. | Content does not include types of technology used to enhance math instruction, a description of each technology, and how the technology aligns to standards. Assistive technologies that could support individuals with exceptionalities in using the two types of technology are not described. | Content includes one type of technology used to enhance math instruction, a minimal description of the technology, and how the technology aligns to standards. Assistive technologies that could support individuals with exceptionalities in using the two types of technology are minimally described. | Content includes two types of technology used to enhance math instruction, a description of each technology, and how the technology aligns to standards. Assistive technologies that could support individuals with exceptionalities in using the two types of technology are described. | Content includes two types of technology used to enhance math instruction, a detailed description of each technology, and expertly aligns the technology to standards. Assistive technologies that could support individuals with exceptionalities in using the two types of technology are clearly described and reinforced with examples. |
| Presentation of Content [ACEI 5.1; InTASC 9(f), 10(e), 10(f), 10(g); ISTE 1d, 3b, 3c, 5d] | 40.0% | Not addressed. | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. | The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. | The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. |
| Layout | 5.0% | Not addressed. | The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate | The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
| Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)construction, word choice, etc.) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors. | Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors. | Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation. | Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |