Accounting Reporting
|
Criteria |
Fail |
Pass |
Credit |
Distinction |
High Distinction |
|
Response to questions |
· Response insufficient or too brief · Response off topic or irrelevant |
- Response very brief - Response only partly relevant |
· Response adequate · Response directly relevant |
· Response detailed but concise · Response relevant and well thought out |
· Response detailed but concise · Response relevant & very well-developed |
|
Summary, synthesis and analysis of source article |
· Limited evidence of engagement with article · No analysis |
· Restates or replicates parts of the article; doesn’t summarise · Little or no analysis |
· Reasonable summary and synthesis · Some analysis |
· Good summary and synthesis · Effective analysis |
· Excellent summary and synthesis · In-depth analysis |
|
Research project rationale and design (aims and objectives, theoretical perspective and methods) |
· Limited/no discussion of project rationale and design |
· Rationale unclear/not well thought out · Design inappropriate/ needs refinement |
· Sound rationale · Adequate design |
· Good rationale · Well thought out design |
· Strong rationale · Excellent project design |
|
Critical discussion, judgement, and overall understanding of topic |
· Poor understanding · No critical discussion or judgement |
· Limited / simplistic understanding · No critical discussion or judgement |
· Reasonable understanding · Limited critical discussion or judgement |
· Good understanding · Some critical discussion/judgement |
· Excellent understanding · Good critical discussion/judgement |
|
Use of research |
· No use of additional research |
· Limited use of additional research · Not well integrated or utilised in discussion |
· Some use of additional research · Adequate to support main points |
· Good use of additional research · Used to build a sound discussion |
· Comprehensive use of additional research · Used very effectively to support discussion |
|
Grammar and readability
|
· Very poor grammar, affecting the readability of the entire paper. |
· Poor Grammar · Parts of the paper not clear |
· Grammar is limited, but adequate · Key arguments can be understood |
· Grammar used with good control · Clear to read |
· Grammar used with precision · Easy to read |
|
Organisation and structure (composition, order and development of paragraphs/sections) |
· No evidence of organisation · No apparent structure |
· Some signs of organisation · Poor structure |
· Effective organisation and structure |
· Good organisation and structure |
· Excellent organisation and structure, with good flow/development |
|
Referencing (citation of appropriate sources) |
· No references |
· Inappropriate sources used · Incorrect referencing |
· Generally adequate sources used · Adequate referencing |
· Appropriate scholarly sources used · Accurate referencing |
· Highly appropriate scholarly sources used · Accurate referencing |