Marketing Research Data Analysis
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 9
Qualitative Data Analysis
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Learning Objectives
• Contrast qualitative and quantitative data analyses
• Explain the steps in qualitative data analysis
• Describe the processes of categorizing and coding data and developing theory
• Clarify how credibility is established in qualitative data analysis
• Discuss the steps involved in writing a qualitative research report
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Nature of Qualitative Data Analysis
• Accuracy of qualitative analysis is based on the rigor of the process followed while collecting and analyzing data
• Qualitative research is useful in providing knowledge for decision makers
– Benefits research that aims to understand psychoanalytical or cultural phenomena
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analyses
Qualitative data
• Textual and visual
• Goal - Increase understanding
• Ongoing and iterative
• Employs member checking – Member checking: Asking key
informants to read a researcher’s report to verify that the analysis is accurate
• Inductive in nature
Quantitative data
• Numerical
• Goal - Quantify the magnitude of variables and relationships
• Guided entirely by researchers
• Describes categories, themes, and patterns prior to data collection
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Exhibit 9.1 - Components of Data Analysis - An Interactive Model
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Data Reduction
• Categorization and coding of data
– Part of the theory development process in qualitative data analysis
• Consists of interrelated processes
– Categorization and coding
– Theory building
– Iteration and negative case analysis
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Steps in Data Reduction
• Categorization: Placing portions of transcripts into similar groups based on their content
– Categories may be coded
• Code sheet: Document containing the themes or categories of a particular study
• Codes: Labels or numbers used to track categories in a qualitative study
• Comparison: Developing and refining theory and constructs by analyzing differences and similarities in themes or types of participants
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Steps in Data Reduction (continued 1)
• Integration: Process of moving from the identification of themes and categories to the development of a theory
– Recursive: Relationship in which a variable can both cause and be caused by the same variable
– Selective coding: Building a storyline around a core category
• Other categories are related or subsumed
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Steps in Data Reduction (continued 2)
• Iteration: Working through the data several times to modify early ideas
– Memoing: Writing down thoughts as soon as possible after each interview, focus group, or site visit
• Negative case analysis
– Deliberately looking for cases and instances that contradict the ideas and theories that researchers have been developing
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Role of Tabulation
• Use in qualitative analyses is controversial
– Tabulation of data may mislead readers
• Helps quantify themes that occur repeatedly
• Promotes honest research
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Data Display
• Common types
– Table that explains central themes in a study
– Diagram that suggests relationships between variables
– Matrix that includes quotes for various themes from representative informants
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Drawing Conclusions and Verifying Results
• Data analysis is considered credible when the results are valid and reliable
– Emic validity: Affirms that key members within a culture or subculture agree with the findings of a research report
– Cross-researcher reliability: Degree of similarity in the coding of the same data by different researchers
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Drawing Conclusions and Verifying Results (continued 1)
• Credibility: Degree of rigor, believability, and trustworthiness established by qualitative research
– Triangulation: Addressing the analysis from multiple perspectives
• Multiple data collection and analysis methods
• Multiple data sets, researchers, and time periods
• Different kinds of relevant research informants
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Drawing Conclusions and Verifying Results (continued 2)
• Peer review: External qualitative methodology or topic area specialists are asked to review a research analysis
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Exhibit 9.9 - Threats to Drawing Credible Conclusions in Qualitative Analysis
• Salience of first impressions or of observations of highly concrete or
dramatic incidents.
• Selectivity which leads to overconfidence in some data, especially
when trying to confirm a key finding.
• Co-occurrences taken as correlations or even as causal
relationships.
• Extrapolating the rate of instances in the population from those
observed.
• Not taking account of the fact that information from some sources
may be unreliable.
Source: Adapted from Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman, Handbook of
Qualitative Research, An Expanded Sourcebook (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, 1994), p. 438.
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Writing the Report
• Sections
– Introduction
• Research objectives
• Research questions
• Description of research methods
– Analysis of the data or findings
• Literature review and relevant secondary data
• Data displays
• Interpretation and summary of the findings
– Conclusions and recommendations
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Writing the Report (continued 1)
• Components of the methodology section of a qualitative report
– Topics covered and materials used in questioning
– Locations, dates, times, and context of observation
– Number of researchers involved and degree of involvement
– Procedure for choosing informants
– Number of informants and informant characteristics
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Writing the Report (continued 2)
– Number of focus groups, interviews, or transcripts
– Total number of pages, pictures, videos, and researcher memos
– Procedures used to ensure systematic data collection and analysis
– Procedures used for negative case analyses
– Limitations of methods
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Writing the Report (continued 3)
• Analysis of the data or findings
– Sequence of reported findings is written in a logical and persuasive manner
– Data displays that summarize, clarify, or provide evidence for assertions are included with the report
– Verbatims are used in textual reports and data displays
• Verbatims: Quotes from research participants that are used in research reports
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Conclusions and Recommendations
• Contain information that is relevant to the research problem articulated by the client
• Some clients highly value the magnitude of consumer response
– Researchers submit findings and suggest follow-up research
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Exhibit 9.10 - Making Recommendations Based on Qualitative Research When Magnitude Matters
• "The qualitative findings give reason for optimism about market
interest in the new product concept... We therefore recommend that
the concept be further developed and formal executions be tested."
• "While actual market demand may not necessarily meet the test of
profitability, the data reported here suggest that there is widespread
interest in the new device."
• "The results of this study suggest that ad version #3 is most
promising because it elicited more enthusiastic responses and
because it appears to describe situations under which consumers
actually expect to use the product.“
Source: Alfred E. Goldman and Susan Schwartz McDonald. The Group Depth
Interview (Englewood Cliffs. N J: Prentice Hall, 1987). p. 176.
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Marketing Research in Action Understanding Product Dissatisfaction
• Write a two-page summary about a recent unsatisfactory purchase experience
– Ten dissatisfaction summaries will be solicited with the assistance of the instructor
• Analyze three product dissatisfaction summaries as a group
– Identify categories, allot codes, and create a code sheet
– Remaining seven summaries will be divided among individuals in the group
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Marketing Research in Action Understanding Product Dissatisfaction
(continued 1)
• Identify the similarities and differences in the narratives
• Create a data display that summarizes the findings
• Create an overarching concept by integrating all themes
• Identify the techniques that help ensure credibility, and explain how they achieve it
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Marketing Research in Action Understanding Product Dissatisfaction
(continued 2)
• Based on the group’s analysis, create a presentation
– Include slides that address:
• Methodology
• Findings (including relevant verbatims and data displays)
• Research limitations
• Conclusions and recommendations