Chapter 10 Groups vs. Teams
Management, 3rd edition
Hitt/Black/Porter
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
*
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Managerial Challenges:
From the front line
10-*
Stephen Ortiz
First job: Staff Consultant, Enterprise Risk Services, Deloitte & Touche
Motto: Live every day like it’s your last
Management
Style: Instill a vision and manage to that vision; collaborative
| Vice President Marketing Prairie Band Casino, Kansas www.pbpgaming.com/ |
*
Key Topics
- Groups vs. teams
- Groups
- Types—planning, organizing, directing, controlling
- Formation and development—influence factors
- Characteristics—structural and behavioral
- Teams
- Competencies
- Conflict
- High-performing development
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
*
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
*
10-*
Groups vs. Teams
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Some groups become teams and some remain “only” groups
Group—set of people
- usually from 3 to 20
- have some degree of mutual interaction
- shared objectives
Team—type of group
- high degree of interdependent, coordinated interaction
- strong sense of members’ personal responsibility for
achieving specified group outcomes - high level of members’ identification with the team
*
10-*
Individual-to-Group-to-Team Continuum
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
TEAMS demonstrate
- Coordinated interaction
- Personal responsibility for group outcomes
- Individual identification with group
Exhibit 10.1
*
10-*
Groups—Basic Types
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
continued
Exhibit 10.2
Designated, created, and sanctioned by organization—basic work and overall mission
*
10-*
Groups—Basic Types
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Formal groups—committees in many organizations
*
10-*
Groups—Basic Types
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 10.2
Group members interact voluntarily
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Formation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Most important factors influencing group formation
Organizational goals
How does the group fit into larger organization’s goals?
Opportunities for interaction and sharing mutual knowledge
Groups can meet face to-face or virtually
Psychological factors
Security needs, social support, self-esteem needs, status needs
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Formation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Questions of new member of organizational groups
Why was I selected, rather than someone else?
What are the real reasons the group was put together?
What will my new responsibilities be?
Are the stated objectives for the group realistic and are they the actual goals that will be
measured?
For over 20 years, Ducasse has employed 500 people. He recruits teams for his restaurants and selects, welcomes, and trains them before encouraging them to stand on their own two feet.
Renowned Chef Alain Ducasse
*
10-*
Groups—Development
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Stages of Group Development
Getting to know you
Conflict about goals
Group identity and cohesion
Actions as coherent entity
Forming Storming Norming Performing
Exhibit 10.4
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Structural Characteristics
- Size
- Composition
- Differentiated
roles - Differentiated status
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Structural Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Size—what is the optimal size?
Large-group advantages
More resources—talent, skills, and expertise
Large -group disadvantages
Social loafing—reduced effort per person
Process costs –increasing costs of coordination as group size increases
Unanticipated disadvantages can appear
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Structural Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Composition—Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous/diverse
Key managerial question
Does a greater amount of diversity within groups more
often help or hinder such outcomes as effective group functioning and performance?
Maximize benefits diversity offers—minimize potential disadvantages
*
10-*
Groups—Diversity Within
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 10.5
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Structural Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Team Roles
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Structural Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Team Roles
- Differentiated roles
- Role ambiguity: The expected behaviors for a group member are not clearly defined
- Role conflict: A group member faces two or more contrasting sets of expectations
- Differentiated status
- Status: Prestige that a person has in a group
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Behavioral Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Norms develop in group
- Norms: A group’s shared standards that guide the behavior of its individual members
- Characteristics—group norms
- Established for important issues of concern
- Some apply only to certain members
- Vary in degree of acceptance
- Vary in how much deviation members are permitted
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Behavioral Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Development of group norms
Exhibit 10.7
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Behavioral Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Development of group norms
Exhibit 10.7
Development of group norms
- Early behaviors
- First behaviors exhibited by members
- Imported behaviors
- Brought by members from previous groups
- Critical events
- A sudden challenge to the group, such as a crisis
- Explicitly stated standards
Effects of group norms
- Conformity: Close adherence to the group’s norms by the individual members
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Behavioral Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Degree to which groups are cohesive
Group cohesion
- Strengthens interpersonal attraction among group members
- Generates a record of high performance and past success of the group
- Fosters competition with other groups
Cohesion—the degree to which members are motivated to remain in the group
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Behavioral Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Effects of high levels of Group Cohesion
Exhibit 10.8
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Behavioral Characteristics
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Prominent Groups and Teams in Today’s Organizations
Exhibit 10.9
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—
Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Developing Team Competencies
Exhibit 10.10
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dealing with Team Conflict: Types of Conflict
Task conflict (cognitive/substantive)
Focuses on differences in ideas and courses of action in addressing the issues facing a group
Process conflict
Differences of opinion about procedures a group should use to achieve its goals
Relationship conflict (affective) Interpersonal differences among group members
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dealing with Team Conflict: Causes of Conflict
Potential causes of task and process conflicts include:
- Ambiguities regarding the task
- Differences in goals, objectives, and perspectives among group
- Scarcity (actual or perceived) of resources to accomplish the group’s goals.
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dealing with Team Conflict: Causes of Conflict
Potential causes of relationship conflicts include:
- Dissimilarities in the composition of the membership of the group, including
- Demographic diversity (age, ethnic/cultural background, gender)
- Status/power differences
- Differences in interpersonal styles of individual members
- Differences in values
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dealing with Team Conflict: Managing Conflict
To manage intra-group conflict:
- Increase the ratio of substantive to relationship conflict
- Clarify and reduce task ambiguities
- Get the group to focus on goals that emphasize the common interests of all group members
- Avoid relationship conflicts
*
10-*
Groups and Teams –Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dealing with Team Conflict: Managing Conflict
To manage inter-group conflict:
- Reduce unnecessary relational conflicts in intergroup interaction situations
- Increase the focus on substantive differences
- Emphasize organization-wide goals to increase cooperation and performance
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Improving the effectiveness of Groups and Teams
A manager knows the group is performing well when…
Exhibit 10.11
Characteristics of Highly Effective Groups
*
10-*
Groups and Teams—Building and Managing
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Improving the Effectiveness of Groups and Teams
Exhibit 10.12
Enhancing Group Effectiveness
*
10-*
Checklist for Leaders of Groups
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 10.13
*
Summary: Key Topics
- Groups vs. teams
- Groups
- Types—planning, organizing, directing, controlling
- Formation and development—influence factors
- Characteristics—structural and behavioral
- Teams
- Competencies
- Conflict
- High-performing development
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
*
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Managerial Challenges: Rest of the Story
From the front line
10-*
Stephen Ortiz
Learning: Not everybody can be friends
Change: Formed a team-based approach
Result: Customer satisfaction scores increased above the company mean scores
VIP sales up 18%—highest in 7 years
| Vice President Marketing Prairie Band Casino, Kansas www.pbpgaming.com/ |
*