M1-psy215
· Post an article, video, or visual to reinforce a peer’s idea or challenge them to see their point from a different perspective.
· Engage in conversation or consider asking a question from history, pop culture, the media, or other societal examples that frame abnormal behavior as being weird or uncomfortable.
Peer 1-CS
· How has abnormal behavior been defined throughout history?
Abnormal behavior that deviates from what is expected and normal. Abnormal behavior is very hard to define, people have to agree on what’s normal this can vary widely both within and outside cultures. An example from HIS 200 class is when British settlers first moved to America they were used to fencing land and raising livestock on it they had a good idea of the difference between public and private land however the American Indians viewed land as a public thing and didn’t understand the concept of dancing parts off further they used the land to raise crops not livestock to the Indians the white man’s way of fencing lands and keeping animals in pens seemed very abnormal. With that said abnormal behavior throughout history has its strengths and also has its problems. One would be violation of social norms, behavior that goes against what is considered by society is abnormal. With my example, culture plays a role in social norms as does age.
· In your own words, how would you define abnormal behavior?
Abnormal behavior compared to the members of given society often a person’s thinking or behavior is considered abnormal if it violates the unwritten social norms or rules about what is expected or acceptable in a particular culture or social group.
· What are some of the ways in which abnormal behavior might be defined across different cultures?
One way of looking at the normal vs abnormal distinction is to use social norms as the basis of what is normal. Within social groups norms develop which dictate the typical accepted way of doing things for members of that group, deviation from the group norm may be an indication of abnormality as it potentially demonstrates as it potentially demonstrates that a person is unable to understand or recognize group norms. An example would be to get through your day performing the typical daily tasks that we all aim to do: get up in the morning, brush your teeth, remember to eat, go to work or school, maintain social contact with family or friends. If your able to do all of these things without undue difficulty then you could be said to be normal on the other side of the coin someone with OCD who’s unable to go to work due to their obsessive compulsive behaviors may be considered to be functioning abnormally.
· What are some of the factors that contribute to abnormal behavior?
There’s a societal bias loaded onto a term like adequate functioning, an example does the ability to hold down a job count as normal behavior or adequate functioning (social factor). Are all unemployed people therefore inadequately functioning and therefore identified as having abnormal behavior (psychological factors). I don’t think there’s a strong argument to suggest this is the case, so to avoid being judgmental (biological factor) in the definition of abnormal behavior we can turn to statistics instead is impersonal but non-judgmental (cultural factors) way of defining abnormal behavior.
· How do these contributing factors apply to any of the following programmatic themes? You may want to review the Programmatic Themes document.
Ethics contributing factor applies to how we treat each other which include morals and values of the persons. Instead of focusing on how people though to behave, ethics show why people act as they do. People are far from completely rational, most ethical choices are made intuitively, by feeling, not after carefully analyzing a situation.
Peer 2-LP
Throughout history abnormal behavior is simply defined as a deviation from the societal norm. Basically anything that stands out in society has been called abnormal behavior. Of course this means that as society has evolved, and social norms have changed, so has the parameters of abnormal behavior. For example, 50 years ago, in the United States it would have been way outside the social norm to even discuss topics such as "gender identity" or " transgender" doing so, and/or displaying a tendency towards these topics was considered abnormal behavior. In today's society, the "abnormal behavior", is assigned more to those still lacking in acceptance of the very terms. My personal definition of abnormal behavior or more refined to the individual. Is the behavior harmful mentally, physically or emotionally? Is it dangerous to one's self or others? Does the behavior lack explanation by culture or social experiences? Yes to any of those questions would, in my opinion, indicate that the behavior is abnormal.
Culture is a huge factor in what is considered "normal" or socially acceptable behavior. For example in the Asian culture, it is not at all uncommon for multi generations to cohabitate, whereas in the American culture, it is expected that children will go off to college and then begin a life of their own, separate from their parents and siblings. Culture differences are not exclusive to ethnicity, they are generational, economical, gender and geographical. In the American culture there is so much diversity that defining a social norm is extremely difficult, in the southern part of the country it is perfectly acceptable to see young children running around outside barefoot and dirty all day long, whereas here in the northeast some would consider that to be neglectful. We are conditioned by our experiences to decide what is normal and what is abnormal behavior.
There are many contributing factors to abnormal behavior. Culturism, as I have discussed, is one of the most prominent, but there are many more to be considered. They include, substance abuse, chronic health issues, particularly neurological ones, genetics or family aggregation and even brain injury. Taking on a sociocultural perspective where one would weigh in the cultural background of a person before drawing a conclusion can help us to avoid unjustly labeling a person as abnormal or suffering from a mental disorder.
Emotional Intelligence is the programmatic theme that stands out the most in relation to abnormal behavior. Having a strong foundation in emotional intelligence encourages one to use critical thinking skills and to view things from many different lenses in order to obtain a clearer picture of the subject. It also helps us to rationalize our own behavior and decipher what is normal as it pertains to our specific societal norms.