Order 1261207: Evaluation Assessment
EDUC 622
Assessment Evaluation Instructions
1. LITERACY FOCUS, which all candidates complete (Assessment Evaluation 1 – Reading)
Since education assessment instruments are costly and not listed in the course materials, this assignment consists of researching and evaluating assessment instruments. If your school has any education kit(s) discussed in this assignment, you are permitted to review the testing materials on your own, however, this is not required. A citation would be included on the reference page.
Specific Guidelines for the Assessment Evaluations
Step 1 – Research
1. Select 4 instruments from the Approved Assessment Instruments List. (See separate document.)
2. Using Buros Mental Measurements, examine 4 measurement studies or measurement reviews about the existing measures from the Approved Assessment Instruments List. There should be 4 assessments reviewed for both Assessment Evaluation assignments.
3. Critically analyze the measures, addressing strengths and weaknesses. There is a data collection template provided to ease the process of collecting information. Each critical analysis should include the following:
· A Summary of the assessment instrument with clear, specific information unique to the instrument, including the population who could be tested with the instrument.
· An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the measure. There must be a minimum of 2 reasons to support each one.
· Justification for why the measurement would be an appropriate measure for different populations.
4. Repeat #3 for each of the 4 instruments.
5. Other resources for research are listed in the syllabus and may be used in addition to Buros. If using the testing instrument manual, list it in the references. Buros is directly accessible through the JLF library database for your convenience.
Step 2 – Written Report
1. Organize and format each assessment instrument with the headings and subheadings outlined below. Do not write the questions or statements from the data collection template. Write in well-formed paragraphs that flow logically from one topic to the next.
2. Each instrument review should contain a minimum of 1 page of content for each assessment instrument.
3. Format each written assessment evaluation with the title, “Analysis of Assessment Name,” using the following headings.
· Summary of Assessment (description of age, subtest, purpose, examiner qualification, instrument’s validity, norms, reliability, scoring proceduring,and etc)
· Strengths and Weaknesses of the Assessment
· Justification and Use of the Assessment
· Below you will find how to reference the various assessments.
· Entire Test Description
· Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales. (2001). In The fourteenth
· mental measurements yearbook. Available fromhttp://buros.unl.edu/buros/
· Individual Test Review
· Kaufman, N. L., & Kaufman, A. S. (2001). [Review of the test Brown
· Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales]. In The fourteenth mental
· measurements yearbook. Available from http://www.unl.edu/buros/
Page 1 of 2