| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-540 | ELM-540-O501 | Literacy Toolkit | 100.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Summary of Strategies | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Summary of strategies is poorly developed and lacking detail of future amendment. | Digital presentation includes a surface level summary of strategies, with minimal future amendment. | Digital presentation includes a detailed and relevant summary of each strategy, with credible future amendment. | Digital presentation includes a thorough and comprehensive summary of each strategy, with in-depth future amendments. |
| Appropriate Interventions | 15.0% | Not addressed. | The explanation as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance for modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students is not included or is inadequately addressed. | A vague explanation is included with limited details as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance, modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students is provided. | Relevant and credible examples as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance for modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students are provided. | Thought-provoking and insightful examples as to how the language and literacy strategies provide guidance for modifying instruction and determining appropriate interventions with at-risk and struggling students are thoroughly provided. |
| Manage and Monitor Success | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Digital presentation includes examples that are unrelated and inappropriate in explaining how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. | Digital presentation includes examples that are rudimentary and lacking detail of how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. | Digital presentation includes relevant and credible examples of how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. | Digital presentation includes insightful and thought-provoking examples of how to manage and monitor the success of interventions for at-risk and struggling readers. |
| Progress Data | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Digital presentation includes an explanation that inadequately and poorly describes the ethical way to communicate student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction. | Digital presentation includes a basic and rudimentary explanation of the ethical way to communication student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction. | Digital presentation includes a detailed and relevant explanation of the ethical way to communication student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction. | Digital presentation includes a substantial and in-depth explanation of the ethical way to communication student progress data, and how to analyze the data based on performance in order to modify instruction. |
| Collaboration with Professionals | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Digital presentation inadequately and poorly describes how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice. | Digital presentation includes a basic and rudimentary description of how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice. | Digital presentation includes a detailed and adequate description of how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice. | Digital presentation includes a thoughtful and insightful description of how to collaborate with professionals in order to advance this professional practice. |
| Research Citations | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Presentation | 5.0% | Not addressed. | The work is sloppy or chaotic. Work would not be presentable for public dissemination. | The work is somewhat disheveled and includes several organizational flaws. Work would barely be presentable for public dissemination. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws. Work would be desirable for public dissemination. | The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |