Literacy Assessment Tool Box
EDUC 554
Literacy Assessment Toolbox Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Literacy Assessment 1: Informal Reading Inventory |
10 points All the following are evident. · The informal reading inventory is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
8 to 9 points All but one of the following components are evident. · The informal reading inventory is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
1 to 7 points Two or more of the following are missing. · The informal reading inventory is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
0 points Not present |
|
Literacy Assessment 2: Diagnostic Reading Tool |
10 points All the following are evident. · The diagnostic reading tool is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
8 to 9 points All but one of the following are evident. · The diagnostic reading tool is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
1 to 7 points Two or more of the following are missing. · The diagnostic reading tool is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
0 points Not present |
|
Literacy Assessment 3: Progress Monitoring Tool |
10 points All the following are evident. · The progress monitoring tool is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
8 to 9 points All but one of the following are evident. · The progress monitoring tool is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
1 to 7 points Two or more of the following are missing. · The progress monitoring tool is appropriately created. · Its supported with research as a literacy practice. · The assessment is original. · It connects to the practicum course for EDUC 554. · An overview of the assessment is provided in the template and is relevant for the grade level in focus. |
0 points Not present |
|
Research-based Support |
37 to 40 points Each created assessment tool is clearly supported with two research-based journal articles from literacy journals for a total of 6 references. The articles are within the past five years. The research from the articles provides a rationale for the use of each assessment tool. |
34 to 36 points Each created assessment tool is supported with two research-based journal articles and are mostly from literacy journals for a total of 6 references. Most of the articles are within the past five years. The research from the articles provides a rationale for the use of most of the assessment tools. |
1 to 33 points There are not two research-based journal articles from literacy journals for each of the assessment tools. Many of the articles that are used for support are from articles that are over five years old. There is not a clear connection between the research and the rationale for the use of the assessment tool. |
0 points Not present |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Mechanics |
14 to 15 points The sentence structure is complete with correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, varied word choices. The writing exemplifies a professional.
|
13 points The sentence structure has minor errors (fragments, run-ons, subject-verb not parallel) with correct spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. There is some variation in word choices. |
1 to 12 points The sentence structure has several errors in sentence fluency with multiple fragments/run-ons and poor spelling, and punctuation. There is limited variation in word choice. |
0 points Not present |
|
Literacy Assessment (s) Template |
10 points The template is fully completed for 3 assessments and submitted as one-word document. It is answered with clarity and in well-developed sentences. |
8 to 9 points The template is mostly completed and attached. Most of the sentences have clarity and are well developed. |
1 to 7 points The template is attached but has many incomplete sections. Some of the sentences lack clarity and are incomplete. OR not submitted as one-word document. |
0 points Not present |
|
Current APA Format |
5 points There is current APA formatting including a title page, header, and reference page. The research that supports each assessment is referenced correctly on the reference page. |
4 points There are some current APA formatting errors, and one of the following is missing: a title page, header, and reference page. Most of the research that supports each assessment is referenced correctly on the reference page. |
1 to 3 points There are many current APA formatting errors, and two of the following are missing: a title page, header, and reference page. The research that supports each assessment is not referenced correctly on the reference page. |
0 points Not present |