eco question
Health Economics ECON 5860 PROF. KURT LAVETTI
Small Area Variations in the Use of Medical Care
2
Small Area Variations
A large amount of variation in the use of medical care and in total medical spending occurs across small-market areas
What explains this variation?
3
Spending Variations 4
Source: Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care
What are some explanations why spending might be so different in different geographic areas?
Spending Variations 5
6
Categorizing Care
Dartmouth Atlas classifies the variations in care into three categories Underuse of effective care Misuse of preference-sensitive care Overuse of supply-sensitive care
7
Underuse of Effective Care
Services that are of proven value and have no significant trade-offs Example: Eye exams for diabetics 55 percent get recommended care (McGlynn)
Receipt of recommended care in Medicare is inversely correlated with spending
Possible explanations Too many doctors with none clearly in charge and
responsible for managing organization of care Financial incentives in accountability are lacking
8
9
Misuse of Preference- Sensitive Care
Misuse of care that involves trade-offs affecting quality and/or length of life where consumers tend to have strong (but potentially uninformed) preferences Example: Hip and knee replacements Variation in breast cancer treatments
Possible Explanations Practice style hypothesis: Local medical practice
styles or “medical culture” has a strong influence on treatment choice rather than recommended guidelines
Imperfect information about “best” medical decisions
Not supply driven
10
11 Geographic differences in use of “optional” care, after conditioning on characteristics of population and physician supply
Supply-sensitive care and moral hazard Supply-sensitive care refers to health services whose use
depends greatly on the supply or availability of that service Example: a doctor’s reliance on MRI technology may depend on
how accessible an MRI machine is to him
Length of stay in a hospital could depend on how much vacancy there is at the time
Hypothesis: doctors with greater access to resources will tend to overprescribe care
Supply-sensitive care
If demand for care is sensitive to supply, then we would expect hospitals with more resources to have larger expenditures
Dartmouth Atlas shows evidence of a positive correlation between # of hospital beds and # of hospital discharges Suggestive evidence that the variation is at least in
part due to technology overuse
14
• Strong correlation between total hospital capacity and utilization of hospital care
• Very weak correlation between hospital capacity and certain medical care that can’t easily be induced--like treating a broken hip
15
Attempts to Quantify Variation
Difficult to precisely quantify what causes this variation in medical utilization patterns
Finkelstein et al (2016) estimate that differences in patient health and patient preferences (including misuse of preference-sensitive care) explain 47% of the geographic variation in spending Remaining 53% is due to place-specific factors,
including differences in underuse of effective care and overuse of supply-sensitive care
16
To Understand Behavior Look to Incentives—what Affects Provider Incentives?
Financial Incentives Do physicians change the medical advice they give to patients
in response to changes in prices?
Intrinsic Motivation What happens when physician ratings are made publicly
available?
Does the desire to have a high rating affect the way doctors treat patients?
Is this good?
17
Provider Incentives: Clemens and Gottlieb (2011)
18
• Study how physicians respond to exogenous change in financial incentives
• Medicare reimbursements are based in part on geographic adjustments (reimbursement = base price*adjustment factor)
• Eg geographic adjustment factor is higher in NYC than in Columbus because it costs more to deliver care in NYC)
• In 1996 there 210 geographic regions, and in 1997 to simplify things reduced to 89 regions
• Physicians in many areas had exogenous shock to reimbursement rate from Medicare
Clemens and Gottlieb (2014) 19 Price adjustment regions before change
Clemens and Gottlieb (2014) 20 Price adjustment regions after change
Clemens and Gottlieb (2014) 21 Change in prices caused by geographic adjustment policy
Clemens and Gottlieb (2014) 22
Interpretation: Each dot is an elasticity estimate. Results suggest if prices increase 1%, the long-run aggregate quantity of medical care supplied increases by about 1.5% (elasticity=1.5)
Clemens and Gottlieb (2014)
Exogenous change in prices 2% increase in payment leads to a 3% increase in
care provision Elective procedures respond more strongly Price increases lead practices to buy more
expensive equipment like MRI machines No impact on health
23
How Does Intrinsic Motivation of Physicians Affect Medical Care?
What happens when information about physician performance is available?
When physicians are compared to their peers, if physicians are intrinsically motivated there may be a supply response to information about quality
Provision of quality information will also affect demand consumers
24
Measuring Provider Quality
Most common measures are outcome and process The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS) published hospital level mortality rates beginning in 1987
Oldest and most widely studied, report cards for surgeons performing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) in New York and Pennsylvania
CABG reporting now in NJ, CA, MA, UK, etc. Market based information
U.S. News and World Report Increasingly available online physician ratings (healthgrades.com, Angie’s List)
25
Evolution of Quality Report Cards
Longest running reporting efforts are in CABG 1994-95
26
Risk-Adjusted Expected Fatality Rate
95% Confidence Interval of Fatality Rate
Evolution of Quality Report Cards 27
Average Above Average
Individual Surgeon Report Cards
Risk Adjustment and Selection
When patients vary in “difficulty” and providers know that their outcomes are being monitored, there is an incentive to select only the easiest patients to treat
Quality measures require risk adjustment: Estimate the probability of a bad outcome based on
observable patient attributes Predict the likelihood that a provider would have been
successful given the patients characteristics Adjust outcomes for the relative difficulty of patients
treated
29
Provider Response 30
Provider Quality and Consumer Choice Survey evidence:
Consumers have difficulty understanding report cards
Physicians under-use report cards when making referrals to other physicians
Statistical studies: Consumers respond to report card information
But healthier individuals more likely to use report cards!
31
Survey Evidence
Schneider and Epstein (1996) survey both physicians (left) and patients (right) in Pennsylvania
32
Welfare Effects of Report Cards
Dranove et al (2003) Increase in total CABG volume driven by work on
less severe patients Improvements in matching Increased spending overall Worse outcomes for more severe patients with
little gain on healthier More skilled surgeons prefer to avoid very complicated
cases, so severe patients are worse off after report cards are released
Conclude that report cards decreased social welfare overall
Welfare Effects of Report Cards
• Report cards increased hospital spending by 3.95 percentage points
• For sicker patients, report cards increased:
• Rate of being readmitted to hospital with heart failure by 2.3 percentage points
• Probability of death by 0.7 percentage points
Attendance Bonus Question
In the assigned reading “The Cost Conundrum,” what US state does the author study?
35
Spending Variations 36
Physician Behavior from a Physician’s Perspective
Atul Gawande article “The Cost Conundrum” Why is McAllen so expensive? Spending of roughly $15,000/Medicare enrollee More than twice the national average Reasons? Mechanisms? Gawande suggests the fix should focus on
Reimbursement and incentives for physicians Improving research on best practices and
guidelines to reduce medical gray area focus on organizational structures that promote
accountability and discourage overutilization
37
- Health Economics�ECON 5860
- Small Area Variations in the Use of Medical Care
- Small Area Variations
- Spending Variations
- Spending Variations
- Slide Number 6
- Categorizing Care
- Underuse of Effective Care
- Slide Number 9
- Misuse of Preference-Sensitive Care
- Slide Number 11
- Supply-sensitive care and moral hazard
- Supply-sensitive care
- Slide Number 14
- Slide Number 15
- Attempts to Quantify Variation
- To Understand Behavior Look to Incentives—what Affects Provider Incentives?
- Provider Incentives: Clemens and Gottlieb (2011)
- Clemens and Gottlieb (2014)
- Clemens and Gottlieb (2014)
- Clemens and Gottlieb (2014)
- Clemens and Gottlieb (2014)
- Clemens and Gottlieb (2014)
- How Does Intrinsic Motivation of Physicians Affect Medical Care?
- Measuring Provider Quality
- Evolution of Quality Report Cards
- Evolution of Quality Report Cards
- Individual Surgeon Report Cards
- Risk Adjustment and Selection
- Provider Response
- Provider Quality and Consumer Choice
- Survey Evidence
- Welfare Effects of Report Cards
- Welfare Effects of Report Cards
- Attendance Bonus Question
- Spending Variations
- Physician Behavior from a Physician’s Perspective�