The Multinational Enterprise in Global Production and Trade Networks - Individual Essay
— The Political Economy of International Business
Week 6: The political economy of production 1: Multinational firms, global value chains (GVCs) and global production networks (GPNs)
BUSM 4694_2120 Lecturer: Jaime Wong 25 February, 2021
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
To create Em dash above headline:
Same size and weight as the headline and set using a soft return.
PC: Em dash (—): Alt+Ctrl+ - (minus)
Mac: Em dash (—): Shift+Alt/Option+hyphen
1
Old models of MNEs
The “vertically integrated” firm
Internationalisation through subsidiaries wholly or partially controlled by the firm
This is still common, but it is not the dominant model today in most tangible industries
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Global Value Chains
“International production, trade and investments are increasingly organised within so-called global value chains (GVCs) where the different stages of the production process are located across different countries. Globalisation motivates companies to restructure their operations internationally through outsourcing and offshoring of activities” (OECD, 2019)
Note that this is a different and more specific term than “globalisation”
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
As the growth of international production and exchange extended further, we started seeing the unbundling of the MNC as a single coherent and discrete entity with clear boundaries. The GVC literature developed a concept of value chains that was first floated by Michael Porter in his Competitive Advantage work.
The GVC approach was developed around a question about whether an unequal relationship existed between where value was being created and where it was captured. In value chains there may be places where exchange is unequal where, for instance, a grower of coffee may get less than the value created when selling to a merchant, or paying debts from a finance company.
Given that GVC began with a special focus on industries in developing countries, it is perhaps no surprise that the approach is associated with the Institute of Development Studies (IDS) at Sussex University, and has been picked up by international policy institutions like the International Labour Organisation.
GVC decentres the analysis of IB on companies and what companies do themselves. GVC is instead interested in relations of power and control up and down industries. These relations are recast not in terms of ownership but in terms of governance, and there are several forms of governance developed here.
GVC also offers policy action and especially through notions of economic and social upgrading.
https://www.oecd.org/industry/ind/global-value-chains.htm
3
History of “Global Value Chain” (GVC)
“Global commodity chain” (Gereffi)
“Value chain” (Porter)
GVCs are industrial patterns where production of single goods occurs in multiple countries and is done by multiple firms/actors.
A product of “fine slicing” of activities towards new locations and suppliers
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
“Value Chain” of a product
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Elements of GVCs
“Lead firms”
“Supply firms”
“Clusters” of production
States/governments
Geography, resources and endowments
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Cluster examples
Silicone Valley: a hub of tech R&D and management Bangladesh: textile processing
Korea: computer parts and screens
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Different types of GVCs
“Producer-driven”
Electronics, Automobiles
“Buyer-driven”
Clothing, Agriculture
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Inter-firm relationships
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
The momentum of GVCs
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Regional Hubs in GVCs
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
High-Value Activities
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
The Changing Smile Curve of Global Production
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Forward and backward linkages in GVCs
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Average Length of GVCs by Industry
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Length of GVCs by industry
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Intermediate goods trade: Imports as a function of Exports
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Example 1: Automobile industry
More hierarchical structure than other industries, “producer-driven”
“First tier” suppliers: airbags, air conditioning systems, brakes, sound systems/radios, etc. Often global
“Second tier” suppliers: raw materials, ball bearings, fuel tanks, sub assemblers, etc. Often local
High transportation costs and political sensitivity lead to regional GVCs: North America, East Asia, Europe
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
1990s- boom in north-south trade
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Japanese cars in Asian factories
(Cited in Baldwin:2011)
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Example 2: Agriculture industry
“Buyer-driven” value chain led by relatively few food conglomerates and retailers
Supermarkets work with growers to set standards
Less regional, more global. Countries like Vietnam, Cambodia, Brazil have highest percentage of exports
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Nutella GVC
10 factories: local supply of packaging, milk. Global supply of: hazelnuts (mainly from Turkey) palm oil (from Malaysia
Papua New Guinea and Brazil) cocoa (mainly from Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana
Nigeria and Ecuador) sugar (mainly from Europe) and the vanilla flavour
(from the United States and Europe)
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Example 3: Consumer electronics industry
Producer-driven. Major lead firms (Apple, Samsung, HP, Sony, etc.) with extremely long value chains. Low transport costs lead toa global industry clustered mainly in East Asia.
High modularity/standardisation of intermediate products
Lots of intellectual property impacting governance.
Firms moving up the value chain from contract manufacturers to lead firms: Acer, Huawei, Lenovo
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Global Production Networks
Production networks are inherently dynamic; they are always, by definition, in a process of flux—in the process of becoming—both organizationally and geographically. The spatio-temporality of production networks, therefore, is highly variable and contingent. As Hudson (2004, p. 462) points out, ‘[...] economic processes must be conceptualized in terms of a complex circuitry with a multiplicity of linkages and feedback loops rather than just ‘‘simple’’ circuits or, even worse, linear flows’
Global production networks: realizing the potential Neil M. Coe*, Peter Dicken* and Martin Hess* (2008) Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 271 – 295.
xt
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Global Factories/Factory-less production
Understanding the factory-less goods producer as a new and novel form of business entity.
Nike, Apple, own no factories.
What enables firms to produce without producing?
Imagines this system as highly centralised.
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Global production: some major questions
Governance: where does the power lie?
Should we look at GPNs/GVCs instead of firms?
What is the future of global production?
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Global Production Networks (GPN)
Production networks are inherently dynamic; they are always, by definition, in a process of flux—in the process of becoming—both organizationally and geographically. The spatio-temporality of production networks, therefore, is highly variable and contingent. As Hudson (2004, p. 462) points out, ‘[...] economic processes must be conceptualized in terms of a complex circuitry with a multiplicity of linkages and feedback loops rather than just ‘‘simple’’ circuits or, even worse, linear flows’
Global production networks: realizing the potential Neil M. Coe*, Peter Dicken* and Martin Hess* Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 271 – 295.
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
The other main network/chain approach is Global Production Networks, developed by economic geographers, notably out of the University of Manchester. Just like the GVC approach the conceptual focus of GPN is on the spatial and institutional relationships between production, exchange, distribution and consumption. It recognises that the way global production is being organised and reorganised is extending across all sorts of countries, producing lots of small components and organised in complex ways.
It is also based on an explicit recognition of the fluidity and changeability of those relationships. As Coe, Dicken and Hess note:
“Production networks are inherently dynamic; they are always, by definition, in a process of flux—in the process of becoming—both organizationally and geographically. The spatio-temporality of production networks, therefore, is highly variable and contingent. As Hudson (2004, p. 462) points out, ‘[…] economic processes must be conceptualized in terms of a complex circuitry with a multiplicity of linkages and feedback loops rather than just “simple” circuits or, even worse, linear flows’. Some networks are long-lived, others are more ephemeral; some are geographically extensive, others are more geographically localized. None remain completely unchanged for very long.” (‘GPN – realising the potential’, Journal of Economic Geography, p 271, 2008)
The claim for GPN then is that like GVC it recognises the increasing fluidity and extended nature of global production. It also claims it is more expansive and comprehensive than GVC, because it opens up non-linear, multi-level relations and transactions.
28
Chains and Networks
Sturgeon, 2000, p. 6
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Chains, Networks and Companies
Value chains: the full range of activities that firms and workers do to bring a product/good or service from its conception to its end use and beyond.
Production networks: interconnected nodes and links extend spatially across national boundaries
Global Company: a business that operates in two or more countries.
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
GPN
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted
Organising Value Chains
‹#›
RMIT Classification: Trusted