Order 1238142: Condensed matter

tutorthammy
Lect-3-Free-electron.pdf

17/09/2018

1

29

The density of states: free electrons We can now calculate the density of states.

we have

Tells how many states fall in a certain energy interval

30

The Fermi-Dirac distribution

• How are the electronic states populated at finite temperature?

17/09/2018

2

31

The Fermi-Dirac distribution

• At T=0 all the states are filled up to the highest occupied state. This state is called the Fermi energy E

F . It is equal to

the chemical potential μ at T=0.

μ kB=1.380×10

−23 J⋅K−1

kB=8.617×10 −5 eV⋅K−1Boltzmann constant

Should be familiar from statistical physics For metals it is a good approximation to say that this is valid for all temperatures For semiconductors it is not!

32

The Fermi-Dirac distribution

17/09/2018

3

33

The Fermi-Dirac distribution

the curved zone in the Fermi Dirac distribution increases with temperature.

If f (E,T) = 0.1 then E-EF=2.2kBT

If f (E,T) = 0.9 then E-EF=-2.2kBT

E

Electrons above EF behave like ideal gas and approximately obey the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution

34

Occupation of the states at finite T

g(E)

g(E)f(E,T)

17/09/2018

4

Problem:

35

Evaluate the Fermi function for energy k T above the Fermi energy

B

f = 0.2689

36

Heat capacity of the electrons: estimate

Their mean energy is

and the heat capacity

The result of this calculation is quite similar to the correct result which is Adv. See A&M Ch2

For derivation

We say that all the electrons in the yellow zone have energy 3/2 kBT (from ideal gas theory)

Important is that C is prop to g(EF) and to T! The true result is found after straight but lengthy calculation

Excited electrons contribute to the heat capacity - estimated from area of rectangle

17/09/2018

5

37

Heat capacity of the electrons

V

Recall, we had

Rearrange EF to give

substituting into expression for g(E) we get

At the Fermi energy, g(EF) = 3N/2E F

(1)

Substituting for g(EF) into (1), and using EF=kB TF we get:

Gives linear in T, and factor 0.01 smaller than classical result

n=N/V

3/2

,

e

N E

E

so number of electrons excited is g(EF) times kB T =3 kB TN/(2EF), or the fraction excited of total electrons, N, is:

38

Heat capacity of a metal: lattice + electrons

• two contributions: lattice and electrons • electrons unimportant at high T but dominating at

sufficiently low T

17/09/2018

6

2 / 32 23 2.12

2 F

N E eV

m V

    

 

1 / 32 13 0 .7 4 6F

N k A

V

       

6 10.86 10FF e

P V ms

m   

42.46 10FF B

E T K

k   

Typical values of monovalent potassium metal;  Typical values e.g. monovalent potassium metal; for potassium the

atomic density and hence the valance electron density N/V is 1.402x1028 m-3 so that:

40

Free electron quantum version of Wiedemann Franz

We must use the Fermi velocity and the correct heat capacity for the electrons. We know (almost) all this.

we get...

so that L = 2.45 10-8 Watt Ω K-2

so this is almost exactly twice the classical (Drude) value

at RT

17/09/2018

7

41

The Wiedemann Franz law: Drude model

estimated thermal conductivity (from a classical ideal gas)

but now we have Using for the velocity

And Eq (1) for Cv with g = 3N/2E F

42

Comparison of the Lorenz number to experimental data

L = 2.45 10-8 Watt Ω K-2

at 273 K

metal 10-8 Watt Ω K-2

Ag 2.31

Au 2.35

Cd 2.42

Cu 2.23

Mo 2.61

Pb 2.47

Pt 2.51

Sn 2.52

W 3.04

Zn 2.31

17/09/2018

8

Problems of the Free Electron Model

• Have assumed only 1 electron per atom; but actually many • Cannot explain optical spectra • Specific heat, although better than Drude is still off by up to

factor of 10

• Can’t explain magnetism • Doesn’t take into account electron-electron interactions

43

• Adv read Ch3 A&M

44

17/09/2018

9

45

46