Law Analysis
EDUC 521
Law Analysis Part II Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Background and Facts of the Cases |
10 points Knowledge applied so that the background and facts of both discussed/researched court cases are clear and accurate. |
8 to 9 points Knowledge applied so that the background and facts of one discussed/researched court case is clear and accurate, while the other court case background may need to be clearer or was not explained. |
1 to 7 points Vague explanation of background and facts on one or both of the court cases. |
0 points Either nothing was explained about the background or facts of the court cases, or the information is vague or incorrect. |
|
Rulings of the Cases |
10 points Knowledge applied so that the rulings of both discussed/researched court cases are clear and accurate. |
8 to 9 points Knowledge applied so that the rulings of one discussed/researched court case is clear and accurate, while the other court case rulings may need to be clearer or were not explained. |
1 to 7 points Vague explanation of the rulings on one or both of the court cases. |
0 points Either nothing was explained about the rulings of the court cases, or the information is vague or incorrect. |
|
Implications to Special Education |
10 points Knowledge applied so that the implications to Special Education of both discussed/researched court cases are clear and accurate. |
8 to 9 points Knowledge applied so that the implications to Special Education of one discussed/researched court case is clear and accurate, while the other court case implications to SPED may need to be clearer or were not explained. |
1 to 7 points Vague explanation of the implications to Special Education on one or both of the court cases. |
0 points Either nothing was explained about the implications to Special Education of the court cases, or the information is vague or incorrect. |
|
Introduction and Conclusion |
5 points Knowledge synthesized on the discussed court cases to formulate a good, thorough Introduction and Conclusion. |
3 to 4 points Knowledge synthesized on the discussed court cases to formulate a fair Introduction and Conclusion. |
1 to 2 points Either missing the Introduction or Conclusion |
0 points No Introduction or Conclusion included. |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Correct spelling, grammar, and capitalization are used. |
5 points Application of correct spelling, grammar, and capitalization used throughout. |
3 to 4 points There are 1–2 glaring errors in spelling, grammar, or capitalization. |
1 to 2 points There are 3–4 glaring errors in spelling, grammar, or capitalization. |
0 points There are more than 4 glaring errors in spelling, grammar, or capitalization. |
|
APA |
5 points Application of correct APA formatting in the areas of title page, headings, citations, and Reference page |
3 to 4 points There are 1–2 glaring errors in APA formatting |
1 to 2 points There are 3–4 glaring errors in APA formatting |
0 points There are more than 4 glaring errors APA formatting |
|
Citations |
5 points Application of at least two citations from 2 different credible sources included |
3 to 4 points Application of one citation from a credible source included (or one of the citations is from a source that is not credible) |
1 to 2 points Application of either a citation or referenced source |
0 points No citation or Referenced source |
Page 2 of 2