Globalization

twinmaker305
journalrubric.pdf

Rubric Detail

Exemplary Proficient NeedsImprovement Not Evident

Critical Thinking and Reflection

10 (25%) Entry supports claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process

8.5 (21.25%) Entry supports claims with mostly relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process

5.5 (13.75%) Entry supports claims with somewhat relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process

0 (0%) Entry does not support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples

Integration and Application

10 (25%) Entry shows excellent depth of knowledge of the module content and exhibits careful consideration of the topic

8.5 (21.25%) Entry shows good depth of knowledge of the module content and demonstrates that the student has read the module content

5.5 (13.75%) Entry shows limited depth of knowledge, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore further

0 (0%) Entry does not address the prompt and reflects that the student has not read the module content

Voice 10 (25%) Entry is written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience, and a consistent voice is evident throughout

8.5 (21.25%) Entry is written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience, and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice

5.5 (13.75%) Entry is written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and is difficult to identify

0 (0%) Entry does not attempt to use a style that considers audience, and there is no evidence of author voice

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: Blog/Journal Rubric ExitExit

Grid View List View

consistent voice identify

Writing 10 (25%) Entry is free of errors in organization and grammar

8.5 (21.25%) Entry is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow

5.5 (13.75%) Entry contains errors of organization and grammar, but errors are limited enough so that entry can be understood

0 (0%) Entry contains errors of organization and grammar making the entry difficult to understand

Name:Blog/Journal Rubric ExitExit