Interview with A Client Who Utilizes Complementary/Alternative Therapies
Interview Grading Rubric (Client) 50 Points
|
Criteria and Scoring: |
50 Points |
40 Points |
30 Points |
20 Points |
|
Identifies client condition that warranted treatment |
Provided detail of condition with signs and symptoms
(10 points) |
Provided generalized identification of condition, no signs or symptoms noted (8 points) |
Vague identification of client condition, no specifics noted
(6 points) |
Very weak identification of clients condition
(4 points) |
|
HIPPA Compliance |
Adheres to HIPPA protocol, no identifying factors noted
(10 points) |
Adheres to HIPPA protocol, potential risk in documentation noted (8 points) |
Non-compliant with HIPPA protocols, one identifying factor noted (6 points) |
Non-compliant with HIPPA protocols, multiple identifying factors noted. (4 points) |
|
Client knowledge base. How did they become familiar with complementary therapies? |
Area(s) explored in detail
(10 points) |
Area(s) explored details not provided
(8 points) |
Area(s) explored are very vague
(6 points) |
Area(s) not assessed during interview
(4 points) |
|
Does the client use complementary therapies in conjunction with traditional healthcare? |
Response documents and details provided regarding provider interactions
(10 points) |
Response documents and some details provided regarding provider interactions
(8 points) |
Weak documentation of complementary Usage.
(6 points) |
Documented therapies, missing significant components of this assessment.
(4 points) |
|
Interviewer assessed the satisfaction with selected therapies or dissatisfaction with selected therapies. |
Obtained maximum information regarding therapy experiences – satisfaction/ Dissatisfaction with rationale.
(10 points) |
Obtained minimal information regarding therapy experiences – limited satisfaction/ Dissatisfaction experiences with no rationale. (8 points) |
Weak documentation of experiences noted. Lacks detailed response, Client experiences not expressed with detail.
(6 points) |
Ineffective assessment, interview lacks Effective usage of interview time.
(4 points) |
· Please note if assignment is not submitted, a zero grade will be given until assignment is completed.