Assignment - REDO - Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

** DEADLINE: FRIDAY 4/

10

/2021**

Assignment: Evidence

-

Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of

Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry

(See attachment “Assignment part 1)

by

closely examining your PICO(T) question.

(See attachment “Discussion PICOT

Question)

You also

begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prep

are:

·

Use the key words from the PICO(

T) question you developed and search at least four different

databases in the Walden Library.

Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews

or other

filtered high

-

level evidence, which includes meta

-

analyses, critically

-

appraised topics

(evidence synt

heses), critically

-

appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence

will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most

important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

·

Reflect on the p

rocess of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer

-

reviewed

research.

The Assignment

(Evidence

-

Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create

a 6

-

to 7

-

slide PowerPoint presentation

in which you do the f

ollowing:

1.

Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

(See attachment

“Assignment part 1)

2.

Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of

interest.

(See attachment “Discussion PICOT

Question )

3.

Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer

-

reviewed articles you selected.

4.

Provide APA citations of the four relevant

systematic

-

reviews level

related to your

research

question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta

-

analysis on your topic, then

use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

5.

Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer

-

reviewed articles you selected,

inclu

ding an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be

specific and provide examples.

Instructions

from

Teacher

about

reference

list

:

Be

sure

to

use

2

outside

resources

related

to

the

peer

reviewed

(systematic

review)

articles

when

synthesizing

information.

Feel

free

to

use

Johns

Hopkins

as

one

of

the

outside

resources

(

attached

).

In

the

end,

be

sure

you

have

the

following

sources

within

your

presentation:

·

Use

2

outside

resources

to

related

to

the

p

eer

reviewed

(systematic

review)

articles

you

selected

as

you

synthesize

them.

·

Additional,

include

2

-

3

course

specific

resources

that

support

the

presentation.

·

ALL

TOTAL

---

Your

reference

list

will

contain

the

4

systematic

reviews,

and

2

outside

resources

(at

least),

and

2

-

3

course

resources.

** DEADLINE: FRIDAY 4/10/2021**

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of

Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry (See attachment “Assignment part 1) by

closely examining your PICO(T) question. (See attachment “Discussion PICOT Question) You also

begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prepare:

 Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different

databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other

filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics

(evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence

will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most

important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

 Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed

research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

1. Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. (See attachment

“Assignment part 1)

2. Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of

interest. (See attachment “Discussion PICOT Question )

3. Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-

reviewed articles you selected.

4. Provide APA citations of the four relevant systematic-reviews level related to your research

question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then

use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

5. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected,

including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be

specific and provide examples.

Instructions from Teacher about reference list:

Be sure to use 2 outside resources related to the peer reviewed (systematic review) articles when

synthesizing information. Feel free to use Johns Hopkins as one of the outside resources (attached).

In the end, be sure you have the following sources within your presentation:

 Use 2 outside resources to related to the peer reviewed (systematic review) articles you

selected as you synthesize them.

 Additional, include 2-3 course specific resources that support the presentation.

 ALL TOTAL --- Your reference list will contain the 4 systematic reviews, and 2 outside

resources (at least), and 2-3 course resources.