Argument Essay

immigration4.pdf

Home >English homework help >Argument Essay

OUR TAKE

8 | AMERICAMAGAZINE.ORG

The Family Separation Crisis Reveals How Far We Are From a Just Immigration Policy

How much suffering and outrage will it take to change the terms of the immigration debate? The recent tragic stories of family separations at our border—an inhumane and unnecessary method of deterrence freely chosen by the Trump administration—has begun to provide an answer.

How much pain, cruelty and cha- os is the administration willing to in- flict in order to appeal to President Trump’s base? At least as much pain as children wailing when they are tak- en from their parents. At least as much cruelty as parents being told their children are going to be bathed when they in fact are being taken away. At least as much chaos as 2,300 chil- dren taken from their families with no credible plan or apparent concern for reuniting them.

How much moral and political opposition needs to be mounted until the administration finally admits—as it apparently has begun to with the signing of an executive order—that it has gone too far? At least as much as both the Catholic bishops and the Southern Baptist Convention de- nouncing family separations as im- moral and unbiblical. At least as much as lawmakers from both parties call- ing clearly for a change in course.

And for all this, not yet enough. Officials from the administration, with Mr. Trump personally leading the charge, have continued to describe their actions as mandated by law—a bald lie—in order to use the tragedy they have manufactured as leverage for their legislative demands.

Moral and political pressure on the Trump administration must be

maintained. Since launching his pres- idential campaign with racist slurs against Mexican immigrants, Mr. Trump has masterfully manipulated fear of immigrants to build his own power while eroding respect for their human dignity. Appealing to nativist sentiments seems to be his primary goal, even more than a border wall, which likely will not work.

The executive order merely re- places the cruelty of family separa- tion with the cruelty of family deten- tion. The cause of both policies is the Trump administration’s “zero-toler- ance” policy to prosecute every per- son crossing into the United States without authorization. The fact is, there is no humane or just way to enforce unjust laws. If the American people will not abide using children to threaten immigrants—or if even that threat proves insufficient balanced against the violence and poverty im- migrants face in their home coun- tries—what assault on human dignity will be next? It will not be enough to reject and repent of these extraordi- nary assaults on the integrity of the family unless the United States also reckons with the fact that its immigra- tion policy needs radical change.

While three fifths of the country disapproves of Mr. Trump’s handling of immigration overall, and even greater numbers reject his family separation policy, a small majority of Republican voters support both. The United States is being held hostage to the immoral and unachievable polit- ical goals of immigration extremists who have rejected attempts at com- promise. As a senator, Attorney Gen- eral Jeff Sessions led the opposition

that doomed the last serious congres- sional attempt at immigration reform, assisted by his communications direc- tor, Stephen Miller, who is now Mr. Trump’s domestic policy advisor and the chief architect of his immigration strategy. No progress on immigration can be achieved if the administration requires that the majority of the coun- try simply capitulates to their demands.

Border security, while necessary, is not an absolute good, as Catholic social teaching recognizes. Its pursuit must be balanced with the need for just methods of enforcement and even more with the basic right of people to migrate in order to sustain their own lives and those of their families. It is both a moral and a practical impos- sibility to seal our southern border, when life in the United States is so much safer than in the violence- and poverty-plagued countries immi- grants are fleeing.

Any realizable proposal to secure the border must start by expanding, rather than reducing, the flow of le- gal, regulated immigration from Latin America to something commensu- rate with the actual demand. It must recognize the need to offer asylum to those fleeing not only political perse- cution but domestic abuse and gang violence. It must be the kind of com- prehensive approach pursued by the Reagan administration during the last major successful reform in 1986, including a path to citizenship for the 11 million undocumented immigrants already peacefully living and working in the United States. Otherwise, the country will simply be priming the pump for the next crisis.

The U.S. bishops have already

A dv

er tis

in g

ad s@

am er

ica m

ed ia

.o rg

2 12

.5 15

.0 12

6 G

en er

al In

qu iri

es 2

12 -5

81 -4

64 0

S ub

sc rip

tio ns

a nd

A dd

iti on

al C

op ie

s 1.8

00 .6

27 .9

53 3

R ep

rin ts

re pr

in ts

@ am

er ica

m ed

ia .o

Ed ito

ria l E

m ai

l a m

er ica

@ am

er ica

m ed

ia .o

JULY 9, 2018 | 9

President and Editor in Chief Matt Malone, S.J. Executive Editors Maurice Timothy Reidy Sam Sawyer, S.J. Kerry Weber Editor at Large James Martin, S.J. Production Editor Robert C. Collins, S.J. Senior Editors Kevin Clarke James T. Keane J.D. Long-García Edward W. Schmidt, S.J. Creative Director Shawn Tripoli Graphic Designer Alison Hamilton Poetry Editor Joseph Hoover, S.J. Vatican Correspondent Gerard O’Connell National Correspondent Michael O’Loughlin Associate Editors Zachary Davis Ashley McKinless Olga Segura Leopold Stuebner, S.J. Robert David Sullivan Eric Sundrup, S.J. Assistant Editors Joseph McAuley Editorial Assistant Vivian Cabrera Producer Eloise Blondiau Contributing Writers Brendan Busse, S.J. Nichole M. Flores Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry Cecilia González-Andrieu Eileen Markey Jim McDermott, S.J. Kaya Oakes Nathan Schneider Stephanie Slade Eve Tushnet Contributing Editors Ellen Boegel Patrick Gilger, S.J. Adam Hincks, S.J. Maryann Cusimano Love Paul McNelis, S.J. Regional Correspondents Dean Dettloff (Toronto) Anthony Egan, S.J. (Johannesburg) Jan-Albert Hootsen (Mexico City) Jim McDermott, S.J. (Los Angeles) Russell Pollitt, S.J. (Johannesburg) David Stewart, S.J. (London) Verna Yu (Hong Kong) Special Contributors Jake Martin, S.J., Sean Salai, S.J. Editor, The Jesuit Post Daniel N. Gustafson, S.J. Moderator, Catholic Book Club Kevin Spinale, S.J. Summer Interns Sean Kolon Allyson Escobar Executive V.P. & C.O.O. Ted Nadeau V.P. for Finance and Operations Rosa M. Del Saz Director of Advertising Services Kenneth Arko Director of Marketing Louis Cassetta Director of Advancement Heather Trotta Associate Director of Advancement James Cappabianca Special Assistant to the President and Editor in Chief Nicholas D. Sawicki Business Operations Staff Anastasia Buraminskaya, Glenda Castro, Karina Clark, Sean Connelly, Ana Nuñez, Ryan Richardson, Elena Te Editors Emeriti Raymond A. Schroth, S.J. Francis W. Turnbull, S.J. Chair, Board of Directors Susan S. Braddock

criticized the new immigration bill proposed by the House Republican leadership along these lines. But in order to achieve anything better, the energy of opposition to the Trump administration’s family separation policy must be maintained past this immediate moment of crisis.

The searing images of children being removed from their parents and held in cages in immigration de- tention centers have roused the con- science of the country. The consistent and explicit witness given by many religious leaders seems to have fi nal- ly made it clear to the public that the God of the Bible stands unambigu- ously on the side of the “stranger in the land.”

Catholics and all Americans should continue to press political leaders to make a stand there as well and should evaluate what direct ac- tions they might be able to take, con- sidering their unique circumstances and abilities, to aid those suff ering because of these policies. The bishops should continue their prophetic lead- ership on this issue, including trips to the border and detention facilities. Offi cials working in the Trump ad- ministration and those responsible for carrying out policies designed to stoke fear of immigrants should care- fully examine their consciences and discern whether their resignations would achieve more good than their continued work within the system.

How much prayer and protest will it take to achieve a more just immigra- tion policy for the United States? At least this much. For the sake of our brothers and sisters on our borders, we can do no less.