Peer Review of the Academic Argument Essay

Bkomama
IchooseAcademicArgument.docx

I choose Academic Argument-welfare, In the paper, the author captures the reader’s attention by highlighting the plight the family encountered in their quest to get financial assistance from the state. Typically, the introduction provides significant background information and sets a suitable tone that effectively engages the reader. A clear focus, as well as the purpose of the paper, is also outlined in the introduction paragraph. Again, a precise thesis statement at the end of the introduction part adds to the essential features that culminate in an adequate introduction.

Qn. 2In an attempt to foster understanding to the reader, the author of the article in subject parades many historical developments that lead to the emergence of welfare programs in America. For instance, the author highlights the various factors that led to the establishment of the first national welfare system in 1935. Similarly, different programs that are facilitated by the welfare in the US are also noted as part of the background information. As a result, the background information provided in the paper extends the main points indicated in the introduction part. Also, the relevant sources that are meant to address the research problem are incorporated as background information. In that regard, we can undoubtedly term the background information as valid because it links the author with the reader

.Qn. 3As the thesis statement, the author notes the welfare system in America ought to be reformed to cater for genuinely needy individuals. In support of this, the author points out that the welfare is meant for those in need rather than a lifestyle. Additionally, it is evident that most families largely depend on the protection and as such a notion of dependency is a dominant culture in the US as highlighted by the author. That is why the author advocates for reforms of the welfare system in an attempt to breed a nation whereby individuals are financially dependent. Again, financial hardships are the cause of welfare abuse in America as evidenced by the burden embedded on the taxpayers. At this point, it is crystal clear that the author parades sufficient as well as efficient evidence that supports the thesis statement.

Qn. 4There is various points in the essay whereby the author refutes views of those people who oppose reforms in the American welfare system. In as much as multiple schools of thoughts in the US believe that state financial assistance is directed to those in dire need, the author points at manipulative consequences of the ordinary taxpayer. For instance, welfare abuse has increased because is not rightfully issued to those in need and that is why the author continually advocates for a new design to assist the truly needy individuals. In that regard, the author opposes the use of Electronic Benefit Transfer in transacting welfare projects as it makes monitoring difficult and consequently manipulation cases are likely to occur. We can, therefore, conclude that the author effectively presents counter-arguments in the essay.

Qn. 5Through the analysis of the paper, I have learned that the backbone of writing a standard argument paper starts with conduction of a thorough as well as structured research. Additionally, formulation of a strong thesis statement is essential to writing an excellent research paper.