Human resource management

Michelle_Michy
HRSIMWeek5.pptx

Session 5 motivation and managing rewards

1

Motivation

The amount of effort that an individual puts into something

(Francesco and Gold 1998)

The willingness to exert high levels of effort towards organisational goals, conditioned by the effort’s ability to satisfy some individual need.’ (Robbins 1996)

The degree to which an individual wants and chooses to engage in certain specified behaviors

(Mitchell, 1982)

2

Characteristics of Motivation

An individual phenomenon. Every person is unique.

Intentional, assumed to be under one’s control and behaviour influenced by motivation are seen as choices of action.

Multifaceted. Two factors of greatest importance

what gets people activated (arousal);

the force of an individual to engage in desired behaviour (direction or choice of behaviour).

Characteristics of Motivation

Driving force within individuals by which they attempt to achieve some goal in order to fulfil some need or expectation.

People’s behaviour determined by what motivates them.

Performance is a product of ability, motivation, skills, knowledge, feelings and emotions, conditions beyond one’s control

What is this driving force?

What are people’s needs and expectations?

How do they influence behaviour and performance at work?

Purpose of Motivational Theories:

to predict behaviour

Motivation is not the behaviour itself, nor performance.

Motivation concerns action, and the internal and external forces which influence a person’s choice of action.

Basic Motivational Model

The Two Aspects of Motivation

Extrinsic motivation

Related to ‘tangible’ rewards

salary and fringe benefits,

security,

promotion,

conditions of work, etc.…

Such rewards are often determined at the organisational level

Intrinsic motivation

Related to ‘psychological’ reward

opportunity to use one’s ability,

sense of challenge and achievement,

receiving appreciation, positive recognition, and

being treated in a caring and considerate manner.

Psychological rewards can usually be determined by the actions and behavior of individuals.

Motivation and Organisational Performance

Organisational success – when members are motivated to use their full talents and abilities, and directed to perform well in the right areas.

Organisational loss /productivity loss: poor working morale

people feeling undervalued and poorly rewarded;

absence of positive team spirit;

low motivation;

lack of attention to quality;

unwillingness to see a job well done;

poor sense of belonging

Content Theories

The ‘what’ that causes people to put effort into work

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

Herzberg’s 2 factors

Process Theories

Attempt to find universal mechanisms to explain ‘how’ motivation works

Goal-setting theory (Locke, 1960, 1980)

Expectancy theory (Vroom, 1964)

Equity theory (Adams, 1965)

Abraham Maslow's Theory Of Human Motivation (1954)

Self-actualisation

Self/Ego/Social Esteem

Social/belonging

Safety/security

Basic/physiological

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

12

Levels 1-3 are basic satisfied by extrinsic outcomes external to person – food, money, praise

4-5 are intrinsic and internal – spring from personal feelings of worth.

Model does not make clear values associated with each level e.g. what promises security in one culture may differ from another

Onedo 1991 – less developed countries (Australia, Papua New guinea in his case) managers regarded SA as most important, but Papuan’s were most dissatisfied with level of security and placed them higher than autonomy needs as in other studies in Chile, India, Malawi, Kenya

Self-actualisation

Esteem/ego needs

Social/belonging needs

Safety/security needs

Basic/physiological needs

Hierarchy of Needs Compared

Maslow’s Hierarchy

Hierarchy of Needs in China

See Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010:270

Self Actualisation

Esteem

Love & affiliation

Safety

Biological

Safety (Personal & National)

Belongingness

Esteem, family, tradition

Self-actualisation thru’ fitting in

Biological

Criticism and Relevance of Maslow’s Theory

Two main criticisms:

Vague and cannot readily predict behaviour

Social philosophy reflecting American middle-class values, hence ‘culture bound’

Relevance

Still influential: behaviour depends on different motives

Used in reward policy, management style, and job design

FREDERICK HERZBERG’S TWO-FACTOR THEORY

MOTIVATORS (satisfaction) HYGIENE (dissatisfaction)
Achievement Admin Policies
Recognition Supervision
Work itself Work conditions
Responsibility Interpersonal relations
Advancement Salary/wages
Growth Job security
Safety

16

A chance for `self-actualisation’ at work may be needed to motivate people

Absence of dissatisfaction ≠ motivation

Good `hygiene’ factors were not enough to cause positive satisfaction/motivation

Absence of dissatisfaction ≠ motivation

18

People can not have any specific grumbles without having a particular impetus to give more to their work.

Dissatisfiers can lead to low motivation and grumbles but more is needed to motivate staff than removing them – they are often called `maintenance’ factors

So `hygiene factors’ equate more to Maslow’s bottom two levels – physiological and safety needs, yet to achieve and grow you need top satisfy higher level needs i.e. by factors intrinsic to job itself.

The process of providing incentives or a threat of punishment to cause someone to do something.

Herzberg argued that this leads to only short-term success because it doesn’t offer anything instrinsic to job.

Job enrichment

The job should have sufficient challenge to fully use the employee’s ability

Employees who show increasing ability should be given more responsibility

If the job can’t be designed to use the employee’s full abilities, automate the task or replace employee with one less skilled.

19

Critics of Herzberg – it’s natural to take credit for satisfaction and to blame dissatisfaction on external factors.

Job satisfaction does not necessarily imply a high motivation or productivity.

Process Theories

Attempt to find universal mechanisms to explain ‘how’ motivation works

Goal-setting theory (Locke, 1960, 1980)

Expectancy theory (Vroom, 1964)

Equity theory (Adams, 1965)

Locke’s Goal-Setting Theory

(Source: Mullins, 2013:268)

Locke’s Goal-Setting Theory

Watch the video (9 mins):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtX_Ueh0j-E

Goals must have:

Clarity

Challenge

Commitment

Feedback

Task Complexity

Expectancy Theory (Vroom 1964)

The strength of a tendency to act in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that an act will be followed by a given outcome

23

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Expectancy Theory (Vroom 1964)

Attractiveness - the importance that the individual places on the potential outcome or reward that can be achieved on the job

Performance-reward linkage - the degree to which the individual believes that performing at a particular level will lead to the attainment of a desired outcome

Effort-performance linkage - the probability perceived by the individual that exerting a given amount of effort will lead to performance

24

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Change Opportunities

What personal lifestyle changes have you made due to Covid-19?

25

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Change Opportunities

Principles for changing behaviour:

Unexpected events

Friendly jealousy

Power of community

Willpower - the hardest to activate

Happy accidents

26

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Expectancy Theory in Action (1)

You have successfully run a public health programme in Sweden.

You have now been asked to join the executive board of an international programme to help manage the public's response to the coronavirus pandemic.

As the northern hemisphere enters into the winter flu season, there is concern that the virus is spreading in a series of spikes just at the time when the population is tired of the numerous restrictions on everyday activity.

On your first day, you are presented with the following problems:

In some countries under your remit, there is a strong following of social media posts which cast doubt on the efficacy of vaccines. In these countries, there is considerable resistance to the possibility of a Covid-19 vaccine…

27

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Expectancy Theory in Action (2)

In addition, there is a smaller minority of the population who are persuaded that the coronavirus pandemic is an artificial creation by governments to control their citizens.

These views tend to coincide with resistance to wearing face masks, however the overlap is not exact.

Some of this resistance is on civil liberties grounds ('I have the right to live my life as I see fit').

In other cases the resistance to face masks seems to be more tied up with the prevalence of 'conspiracy theories'.

28

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Expectancy Theory in Action (3)

The next problem is concerned with practical rather than ideological resistance. In some ways this is more worrying, as it affects a large proportion of the population. In many countries, populations pulled together during the first wave of the pandemic.

Now however, as local lockdowns and curfews are in force, citizens are asking why their particular town or city or region is subject to restrictions, while others are not.

Furthermore, compliance varies from country to country, and in those countries where compliance has been ‘loose’, there is evidence of resentment on the part of those who have, so far, stuck to the rules.

29

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Expectancy Theory in Action (4)

Finally, as governments attempt to tailor the restrictions they are imposing on the population so as to avoid the full economic impact of a national lockdown, local and regional representatives complain of lack of clarity.

How can citizens comply with the regulations if they don’t fully understand what is expected of them, or why such measures are necessary in the first place?

In a brainstorming session with your colleagues, suggest how you might tackle each of these three problems. To strengthen your argument, make reference to Vroom’s expectancy theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIXUg6N-eOs

How might you need to adapt your proposed strategy to account for cultural differences?

30

and others – Nadler, Porter and Lawler

This is a process theory – i.e. is about HOW people are motivated and not specifying particular factors

Adam’s Equity Theory

Restoration of equity

Restoration of equity

Person’s Other’s

outcomes outcomes

inputs inputs

Person’s Other’s

outcomes outcomes

inputs inputs

Perceived inequity

Tension

Motivation

Changes to

input

outcomes

cognitive distortion

leaving the field

acting on others

changing the object of comparison

Comparing one’s own inputs to the job and the output that result with the inputs and outputs of as chosen other person (start at the left)

31

32

Algorithmic vs Heuristic Tasks

An algorithmic task is one in which you follow a set of established instructions down a single pathway to one conclusion.

A heuristic task is one in which you have to experiment with possibilities and devise a novel solution.

See Dan Pink’s ‘Motivation 3.0’ (18 mins):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrkrvAUbU9Y&list=PLOs0lcCMEHfJpH0Zyz8lgD7aa7tPuUJqI&index=1

32

An Integrated Motivation Programme (Whetton et al, 2002)

Establish moderately difficult goals

Remove personal and organisational obstacles

Feedback

Use rewards and discipline appropriately

Provide relevant internal and external incentives

Distribute rewards equitably

Provide timely rewards and honest feedback

Motivating by Teamwork

Naumann ’93 found organisational features eg work relationships can be motivating

Influence of collectivist cultures eg Quality Circles – volunteers meet regularly to identify, analyse and resolve production problems

Toyota, Motorola, Xerox – groups encourage involvement, use skills of whole workforce

Factors affecting motivation for the MNE

Compensation for other family members

Currency fluctuation

Taxes – local and head office

Return package

Comparison with ex-pats and locals; comparison with other departments

Education, home leave travel

Cultural Factors

Most studies based on USA research where there is

High individualism

Low power distance

Relatively high masculinity (hence material values)

Based on assumption that workforce has same values as US society

36

High Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI) cultures value job security

Low UAI cultures value job variety

High Power Distance (PDI) cultures value opportunities to work for manager who shows loyalty to staff and gives clear instructions

Lower PDI cultures – value opportunities to work with a manager who is consultative

Cultural Factors

International Strategies

Parent-country equivalency – all expatriates based on market rates at home – works well if home firm has high pay and conditions

Regional or composite markets – calculation of an average pay for a region eg Central America, Scandinavia; could be problematic

Local markets – works if firm takes multi-domestic strategy

38