Anthpology

BLKMAMBA81
HominidChartTableExample.docx

Your Name

Professor Henninger-Rener

Physical Anthropology

Date

Trait

Paranthropus bosei

Example

Australopithecus afarensis

Homo habilis

Homo erectus

Homo neanderthalensis

Homo sapien

Living time period

2.4-1.4mya

Famous fossil example

Zinj skull

Brain size range

400-500 cc

Facial traits

Sagittal crest, thick supraorbital ridge and zygomatic arches leading to a wide face. Large, thickly enameled teeth and a large jaw. Some prognathism

Changes to upper & lower body related to locomotion

Long arms and long/curved fingers with a triangle rib cage indicate arboreal living. Angled femurs, bowl shaped pelvis, toes in line, and arch in foot indicate bipedalism.

Tool tradition and examples

No known tool use, but species at the same time used a tradition called Lomekwian made of anvils and core tools.

Social & cultural behavior

Little know. Since there is sexual dimorphism, it is argued they likely lived in polygynous groups

In 1-2 pages, not including cover page or chart, please answer the following questions: What trends/patterns do you see across ALL species in the following rows: brain size, facial traits, and changes in upper/lower body as they relate to locomotion? Why may these trends have been adaptive for human survival?

Example: In the area of tool traditions, a trend that I noticed is that the tool traditions gradually include a larger number of diverse tools. For instance, for Australopithecus afarensis the tools are limited to cores and flakes with sharp edges. As new species evolve, tools types become more numerous (cores, flakes, and hand axes for Homo erectus, cores, flakes, hand axes, lissiors, and spear heads for Homo neanderthalensis; etc.). Having a variety of tool types would have been adaptive for humans to take advantage of different food resources for survival, to reduce the time and danger it takes to get food, and to allow for greater protection with weaponry.

Begin your write up on the top of the next page.