SFTY 320 Human Factors in Aviation Safety (Embry Riddle)

meagan.love25
HMReaseachPaperSFTY320.docx

Sfty 320 Human Factors in Aviation Safety Research Paper

Research Paper

Requirements:

Employ the information covered in this course (as appropriate) to analyze, evaluate, and create a solution(s) to an existing aviation human factors and aviation safety issue.

Criteria

You must meet the following requirements:

·  A 5-7 page paper in length, double-spaced (body only, not including other pages).

· Written in the current APA style format.

The grading standard for both is detailed in the Research Paper Rubric in Module 7. 

Topic: Crew Resource Management and Reduction in Human Error

SFTY 320 7.4 Research Paper Rubric V2

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext / Introduction

Paper should provide an introduction and a research problem that is related to the field of applicable discipline. Presents relationships between factors with examples. Should develop a coherent, central theme that is expressed in an organized, and logical manner throughout.

15.0 pts

Exceeds Standards

13.0 pts

Meets Standards

10.0 pts

Does Not Meet Standards

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch

Paper should provide comprehensive identification and analysis of issues in the realm of applicable discipline. Should design a course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate. The evidence should come from valid sources. References should be complete and reflect appropriate sources.

25.0 pts

Exceeds Standards

21.0 pts

Meets Standards

17.0 pts

Does Not Meet Standards

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension

Paper should contain well-supported argument based on relevant concepts and theories, providing new ideas to the applicable discipline. Argument should be logical and use examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from valid, external information sources.

25.0 pts

Exceeds Standards

21.0 pts

Meets Standards

17.0 pts

Does Not Meet Standards

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication

Decisions and conclusions should be a result of analysis and synthesis of evidence. Should formulate resolution and recommendations, and may contribute to improvements in the applicable discipline. Conclusion could include possible consequences and outcome scenarios.

25.0 pts

Exceeds Standards

21.0 pts

Meets Standards

17.0 pts

Does Not Meet Standards

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics

Mechanics of style should enhance content understanding, and writing skillfully supports the message and is in required format. Citations and references present and IAW APA.

10.0 pts

Exceeds Standards

8.0 pts

Meets Standards

7.0 pts

Does Not Meet Standards

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Previous Next