|
30.0 %Health Care Model Knowledge
|
Includes little knowledge about each or several models. Subject knowledge is not evident.
|
Includes little knowledge about each model (medical, holistic, epidemiological triangle, and social). Outlines underlying causes and symptoms, as well as personal, social, economic, and environmental factors with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident.
|
Includes knowledge about each model (medical, holistic, epidemiological triangle, and social) with some supporting details and examples. Presents basic information in relation to underlying causes and symptoms, as well as personal, social, economic, and environmental factors. Some subject knowledge is evident.
|
Includes essential knowledge about each model (medical, holistic, epidemiological triangle, and social) with supporting details and examples. Addresses underlying causes and symptoms, as well as personal, social, economic, and environmental factors. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
|
Covers each model (medical, holistic, epidemiological triangle, and social) in depth. Fully covers underlying causes and symptoms, as well as personal, social, economic, and environmental factors with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
|
|
|
30.0 %Analysis
|
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
|
Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions.
|
Surface-level evaluation of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
|
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
|
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
|
|
|
20.0 %Content Comprehension
|
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
|
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
|
Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.
|
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated.
|
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated.
|
|
|
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
|
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Wriiter either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
|
Some distracting inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
|
For the most part, language is appropriate to the targeted audience.
|
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
|
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
|
|
|
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|