YULE HCI- PP
• Integration of Knowledge as it applies to the Topic 20% of total result ExcellentThe Powerpoint demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. The presentation answers “the importance of informatics and health technologies in nursing practice”. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. 20 SatisfactoryThe PowerPoint demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the presentation as the author tries to answer “the importance of informatics and health technologies in nursing practice”. 16 UnsatisfactoryThe PowerPoint demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course; however there are significant gaps in answering “the importance of informatics and health technologies in nursing practice”. 12 UnacceptableThe PowerPoint does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course. No connection to “the importance of informatics and health technologies in nursing practice” is made in the presentation. 8
• Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness 20% of total result ExcellentIn-depth discussion and elaboration of the topic in all sections of the presentation. Ties together information from all sources. Presentation flows from one issue to the next with no headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Author ties together information from all sources. 20 SatisfactoryIn-depth discussion and elaboration the topic in most sections of the presentation. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Presentation flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. 16 UnsatisfactoryThe writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The presentation does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. 12 UnacceptableCursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It does not tie together
information. Presentation does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding of any relationship 8
• Sources 20% of total result Excellent8 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative. 20 SatisfactoryUsed 3 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative. 16 UnsatisfactoryUsed 2 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible. 12 UnacceptableFewer than 2 current sources are used which are peer- reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
8
• APA adherence and Citation in text 20% of total result ExcellentFewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. Pictures and graphs are all referenced 20 SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/ or quotations, and APA format errors. at least 5 pictures, graphs, etc are not cited. 16 UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. 12 UnacceptableThe citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is NOT in APA Format. 8
• Spelling , Grammar, Creativity 20% of total result
ExcellentFewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met. The presentation has utilized creativity for the presentation and is engaging to the reader. 20 SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count. Some creativity measures have been utilized in the presentation and the presentation is somewhat engaging to the reader. 16 UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count. No creativity measures have been utilized in the presentation and the presentation has utilized no engaging strategies to capture the reader's attention. 12 UnacceptableAn unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count. 8