Manage Project

Kandacekgreen
Guidelines.pdf

A great place to learn, work, and invest

13

Business case 1.5.4, 1.5.5, 1.5.6

6 points The document

includes good depth in explanations of the

introduction/ background, business

objective, a problem/opportunity

statement, critical assumptions, any options, a budget

estimate and financial analysis, schedule

estimate, and potential risks.

4 points The document includes

fair depth in explanation of the

introduction/ background, business

objective, a problem/opportunity

statement, critical assumptions, any options, a budget

estimate and financial analysis, schedule

estimate, and potential risks.

1 point The document includes

poor depth in explanations of the introduction/

background, business objective, a

problem/opportunity statement, critical

assumptions, any options, a budget estimate and

financial analysis, schedule estimate, and potential

risks.

SWOT analysis 1.5.6 2 points The document

includes good depth in explanations of the

strengths and weaknesses, of

yourself and the external opportunities

and threats to your project.

1 point The document includes

fair depth in explanations of the

strengths and weaknesses, of

yourself and the external opportunities

and threats to your project.

.5 points The document includes

poor depth in explanations of the strengths and

weaknesses, of yourself and the external

opportunities and threats to your project.

Work Breakdown Structure

1.5.2 4 points The document all

major categories of work including sub-

categories in an outline format that represents the work

performed in the project.

3 points The document most categories of work

including sub- categories in an outline format that represents the work performed in

the project.

1 point The document a few of the

categories of work including sub-categories in

an outline format that represents the work

performed in the project.

Cost Breakdown

1.5.4 2 points The document

includes good depth in explanations of the

costs of all expenditures.

1 point The document includes

fair depth in explanations of the

costs of all expenditures.

.5 points The document includes

poor depth in explanations of the costs of all

expenditures.

A great place to learn, work, and invest

14

Critical path 1.5.4 2 points This document gives in

good detail a representation over

time of the work performed on the

project. This can be in the form of a Gantt chart or critical path

chart.

1 point This document gives in

fair detail a representation over

time of the work performed on the

project. This can be in the form of a Gantt chart or critical path

chart.

.5 points This document gives in

poor detail a representation over time of the work performed on the project. This can be in the form of a Gantt chart

or critical path chart.

Communication plan

1.5.2, 1.5.6

3 points The document

includes good depth in explanations of the

stakeholder communication’s

requirements, detailed communications summary chart,

comments/guidelines, procedures for

resolving issues, and a revision procedure.

2 points The document

includes fair depth in explanations of the

stakeholder communications

requirements, detailed communication’s summary chart,

comments/guidelines, procedures for

resolving issues, and a revision procedure.

1 point The document includes

poor depth in explanations of the stakeholder communications

requirements, detailed communication’s summary

chart, comments/guidelines,

procedures for resolving issues, and a revision

procedure.

Risk management

1.5.3 3 points The document

includes good depth in explanation of how you will handle the risk involved in the

project, including and contingencies.

1 point

2 points The document

includes fair depth in explanations of how

you will handle the risk involved in the project,

including and contingencies.

The document includes poor depth in explanations of how you will handle the

risk involved in the project, including and

contingencies.

A great place to learn, work, and invest

15

Criteria for Determination of Grade 1. Personal Bio 8

2. Team Project 30

3. Personal Project (Hallmark Assessment) 30

4. Quizzes (4 @ 5 Points Each) 20

5. Participation 10

6. MBTI Exercise 2

Total 100

Note: Up to 25% may be deducted from written assignments for failing to adhere to APA 6th edition formatting requirements and/or grammatical mistakes. Students are strongly encouraged to utilize the University of Louisville’s writing center for support.

Grading Scale 100-98 A+ 97-94 A 93-90 A- Less than 60 = F

89-87 B+ 86-83 B 82-80 B-

79-77 C+ 76-73 C 72-70 C-

69-67 D+ 66-63 D 62-60 D-